Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later[^][v]#447,983
> We tend to treat only dating people you have oppressive power over as creepy, right?
> A cis person who only dates trans people is probably a chaser.
> An abled person who only dates disabled people is a creep and probably a fetishist
> A thin person who dates only fat people and excludes other thin people as potential partners is creepy and probably has a fetish.
> A white person who doesn’t date other white people but dates people of color is also a creep and is probably acting on a fetish.
> Why, then, do we act like a man who exclusively seeks women as partners to the exclusion of other men is acting on an immutable preference? Why does he get the benefit of the doubt that he is not acting on a fetishized belief of what women are? Why is having a strong preference for partners down this specific power dynamic considered natural and beyond challenge?
> Why is the word for this kind of man “heterosexual” or “straight” and not “creepy dude who only dates women”?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#448,012
dr;ws
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 24 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#448,019
duh we are talking about cis dudes here we already know that they are fetishists and scrumbads
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#448,048
So a random ladyboy thinks I'm creepy. Oh dear, I'd better call in sick today.