Topic: hitler was good
hamfist !2E1ogQqRO. started this discussion 13 years ago #31,344
he did a lot of cool things and had some good ideas
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 13 minutes later[^] [v] #444,349
He had to die so that McDonald's could live.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 6 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #444,350
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 55 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #444,355
He started the first ant-smoking campaign and sterilized heavy drinkers. He perfected the police checkpoint. HE HATED WHIPPED CREAM. I could go on and on, but basically he was a kewl dude who should be mayor of New York.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #444,371
Anonymous D replied with this 13 years ago, 18 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #444,374
@previous (E)
One little fuck up and you turn on him? He hated freedom and loved bull semen. He was a better neurotic Jew than any neurotic Jew. He an heroed! He's cool.
One little fuck up and you turn on him? He hated freedom and loved bull semen. He was a better neurotic Jew than any neurotic Jew. He an heroed! He's cool.
Anonymous E replied with this 13 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #444,378
Anonymous D replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #444,387
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #444,435
He lived in a nice houseAnonymous F double-posted this 13 years ago, 17 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #444,436
He had a nice catAnonymous G joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 12 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #444,512
@444,374 (D)
This is how history works though. He lost, therefore he's a loser. It has nothing at all to do with the douchebag factor. Stalin and Mao were douchebags, but they won, so they outclass Hitler by virtue of result.
This is how history works though. He lost, therefore he's a loser. It has nothing at all to do with the douchebag factor. Stalin and Mao were douchebags, but they won, so they outclass Hitler by virtue of result.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #444,543
Anonymous G replied with this 13 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #444,544
@previous (H)
Only proving my point. Hitler's government was more successful, but is less widely recognized as a success. What's the reason for this? Because his power was unenduring. It's as simple as that.
People worship power. Ideology, wealth and celebrity are all secondary to time. True power extends well beyond it's possessor's death. Walt Disney is more powerful in death than Hitler is, though in life he wielded no such authority.
I wish I was smart enough to figure out precisely what Hitler dis wrong, cause he did so many things right when you think about it.
Only proving my point. Hitler's government was more successful, but is less widely recognized as a success. What's the reason for this? Because his power was unenduring. It's as simple as that.
People worship power. Ideology, wealth and celebrity are all secondary to time. True power extends well beyond it's possessor's death. Walt Disney is more powerful in death than Hitler is, though in life he wielded no such authority.
I wish I was smart enough to figure out precisely what Hitler dis wrong, cause he did so many things right when you think about it.