Topic: Self-identified pedophiles aren't allowed to post on Wikipedia
Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #313
This is an official policy.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Child_protection
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Child_protection
sim !!qjzMTndqT joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #5,688
I'm ok with this.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 22 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #5,689
Minichan; Expert pedophile information network. ;}
sim !!qjzMTndqT replied with this 15 years ago, 49 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #5,691
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #5,692
If anything, this policy needs to be more generalized for society. I'd be ok with self-identified pedophiles being banned from the ineternet--no, I'd actually fully endorse it.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 33 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #5,693
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #5,695
That's appalling really.
jump !VIfloDyEYo joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #5,699
@5,692 (A)
Where will we meet children without fear of public exposure? I mean, if you start to talk with a 12 year old in a mcdonalds, well, people never mind their own business.
Where will we meet children without fear of public exposure? I mean, if you start to talk with a 12 year old in a mcdonalds, well, people never mind their own business.
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #5,700
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
For real? I had no idea that even happened.
Even still, it's an extremely weird and unorthodox policy.
For real? I had no idea that even happened.
Even still, it's an extremely weird and unorthodox policy.
jump !VIfloDyEYo replied with this 15 years ago, 7 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #5,701
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Sounds like an anti-propoganda campaign to me.
Sounds like an anti-propoganda campaign to me.
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #5,706
> Editors who attempt to use Wikipedia to pursue or facilitate inappropriate adult–child relationships,
fine
> who advocate inappropriate adult–child relationships,
fine
> or who identify themselves as pedophiles, will be indefinitely blocked.
not fine.
It's thought police, and it's wrong.
fine
> who advocate inappropriate adult–child relationships,
fine
> or who identify themselves as pedophiles, will be indefinitely blocked.
not fine.
It's thought police, and it's wrong.
jump !VIfloDyEYo replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #5,711
The Editor !nKs3AbhqKc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 52 seconds later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #5,712
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #5,713
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Huh? Of course anyone who links to that should be banned.
@5,711 (jump !VIfloDyEYo)
I reckon.
@previous (The Editor !nKs3AbhqKc)
Wop Wop Warrrrrrrrrrrrrp.
Huh? Of course anyone who links to that should be banned.
@5,711 (jump !VIfloDyEYo)
I reckon.
@previous (The Editor !nKs3AbhqKc)
Wop Wop Warrrrrrrrrrrrrp.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #5,714
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #5,727
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
> There are pedophiles all over the site taking every chance to link to CP.
Uh, okay. I never encountered anyone linking to CP in my tenure as a sysop.
> They never got banned until now.
Suspected pedophilia has been grounds for a ban on Wikipedia for several years.
> There are pedophiles all over the site taking every chance to link to CP.
Uh, okay. I never encountered anyone linking to CP in my tenure as a sysop.
> They never got banned until now.
Suspected pedophilia has been grounds for a ban on Wikipedia for several years.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #5,730
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
> ITT: delusional pedos, one forever neutral personality, and everyone else--the sensible folks.
ftfy
> ITT: delusional pedos, one forever neutral personality, and everyone else--the sensible folks.
ftfy
Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #5,731
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
All of the lingo in my post was used correctly (both "sysop" and "ban"). You're welcome to demonstrate otherwise.
All of the lingo in my post was used correctly (both "sysop" and "ban"). You're welcome to demonstrate otherwise.
Anonymous I double-posted this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #5,735
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
> I can't.
> I can't.
Anonymous I triple-posted this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #5,744
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
You don't want what?
You don't want what?
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,777
Oddly, I don't think they should ban people just for being pedos. That seems extreme.
Although, I can imagine that those people who would think it necessary to identify themselves as pedos on a wiki probably tend to be the... special type of pedo. The ones who use words like pedosexual and probably edit in all their propaganda shit everywhere.
Although, I can imagine that those people who would think it necessary to identify themselves as pedos on a wiki probably tend to be the... special type of pedo. The ones who use words like pedosexual and probably edit in all their propaganda shit everywhere.
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,778
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,779
Don't Ask, Don't Tell
The Magogo„¢ !!F0+vKzoih joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,864
So even if someone has never committed a single crime, simply because of inner thoughts they suffer repercussions? So, the Thought Police is not just a theory anymore?
Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,869
@previous (The Magogo„¢ !!F0+vKzoih)
> So even if someone has never committed a single crime, simply because of inner thoughts they suffer repercussions?
That's what she said.
> So even if someone has never committed a single crime, simply because of inner thoughts they suffer repercussions?
That's what she said.
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,874
cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w replied with this 15 years ago, 20 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,875
@5,864 (The Magogo„¢ !!F0+vKzoih)
It's not really "inner thoughts" if you're going around saying, "Hey guys, I'm a pedo!" all the time. That's an action. And most people are uncomfortable with pedos.
Although, like I said, I don't agree with this... it's just there's likely a good reason why Wikipedia takes this stance.
It's not really "inner thoughts" if you're going around saying, "Hey guys, I'm a pedo!" all the time. That's an action. And most people are uncomfortable with pedos.
Although, like I said, I don't agree with this... it's just there's likely a good reason why Wikipedia takes this stance.
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,879
Nega !34Kas0OdzM double-posted this 15 years ago, 36 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,883
@5,875 (cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w)
> It's not really "inner thoughts" if you're going around saying, "Hey guys, I'm a pedo!" all the time. That's an action. And most people are uncomfortable around pedos.
Indeed.
> It's not really "inner thoughts" if you're going around saying, "Hey guys, I'm a pedo!" all the time. That's an action. And most people are uncomfortable around pedos.
Indeed.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 11 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,884
@5,875 (cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w)
> it's just there's likely a good reason why Wikipedia takes this stance
Probably because they would go around editing articles to fit their distorted view.
> it's just there's likely a good reason why Wikipedia takes this stance
Probably because they would go around editing articles to fit their distorted view.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,888
psychopath !PSYCHOhc32 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 15 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,908
Can you really blame them? Wikipedia is an American company, and being a paedophile in America is worse than denying the holocaust while slaughtering babies in an orphanage in Europe.
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,931
Mindwurms !!4IKKtS9GG joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,935
@5,908 (psychopath !PSYCHOhc32)
So denying a self-professed pedophile a teaching or childcare position is bigotry?
So denying a self-professed pedophile a teaching or childcare position is bigotry?
psychopath !PSYCHOhc32 replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,940
@previous (Mindwurms !!4IKKtS9GG)
Yes, but that is a lesser evil to putting a child at risk of sexual abuse.
Yes, but that is a lesser evil to putting a child at risk of sexual abuse.
Mindwurms !!4IKKtS9GG replied with this 15 years ago, 49 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,942
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,944
@previous (Mindwurms !!4IKKtS9GG)
Which is why they shouldn't be on the internet. Really this is the least that can be done.
Which is why they shouldn't be on the internet. Really this is the least that can be done.
psychopath !PSYCHOhc32 replied with this 15 years ago, 19 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,946
Anonymous O replied with this 15 years ago, 3 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,947
psychopath !PSYCHOhc32 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,948
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,951
@previous (psychopath !PSYCHOhc32)> How many 12 year olds post on Minichan under the alias Mindwurms? Just one.
OUCH!
(Edited 23 seconds later.)
advi !!3gpAcg/hF joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 30 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,987
Why not just ban them from editing sex-related articles and sections? If a pedophile wants to update the Mercedes-Benz article with 2010 sales information, then what the hell is wrong with that?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,991
@previous (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
Because pedophiles have a habit of bringing up their disorder regardless of what they're doing. See: mountainman, jump, homestar, toaster.
Because pedophiles have a habit of bringing up their disorder regardless of what they're doing. See: mountainman, jump, homestar, toaster.
(Edited 24 seconds later.)
advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,993
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 30 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,994
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 40 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,996
@5,993 (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
I know that at least one of the posters i listed above can and would find a way.
I know that at least one of the posters i listed above can and would find a way.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,997
AC !tyLmN8C16E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,000
@5,777 (cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w)
> Although, I can imagine that those people who would think it necessary to identify themselves as pedos on a wiki probably tend to be the... special type of pedo. The ones who use words like pedosexual and probably edit in all their propaganda shit everywhere.
This.
> Although, I can imagine that those people who would think it necessary to identify themselves as pedos on a wiki probably tend to be the... special type of pedo. The ones who use words like pedosexual and probably edit in all their propaganda shit everywhere.
This.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 3 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,002
lol
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,008
Jack the Viking !gOStA1p7Pc joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,016
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 24 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,017
@6,000 (AC !tyLmN8C16E)
Nice get.
@6,008 (A)
> Aka like every self-identified pedo here at MC
Haha, which Universe are we talking about? ;)
Nice get.
@6,008 (A)
> Aka like every self-identified pedo here at MC
Haha, which Universe are we talking about? ;)
AC !tyLmN8C16E replied with this 15 years ago, 22 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,018
Anonymous S replied with this 15 years ago, 3 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,019
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 56 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,024
@6,017 (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
mountainman, jump, homestar, and toaster have all used the fictional term "pedosexual". Their arguments are always of similar quality.
mountainman, jump, homestar, and toaster have all used the fictional term "pedosexual". Their arguments are always of similar quality.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 25 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,025
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 25 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,027
Anonymous S replied with this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,028
@6,024 (A)
I think to4str is a pretty cool guy. Eh, owns AnonBBS and doesn't afraid of anything. But seriously, he's a pretty cool guy to talk to. jump too.
I think to4str is a pretty cool guy. Eh, owns AnonBBS and doesn't afraid of anything. But seriously, he's a pretty cool guy to talk to. jump too.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 5 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,029
Anonymous S replied with this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,030
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 34 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,063
Mindwurms !!4IKKtS9GG replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,065
@5,948 (psychopath !PSYCHOhc32)Is it wrong to enjoy the attention? (Pic related)
Anyway, if we're going to let self-proclaimed pedophiles edit Wikipedia, why not let self-admitted racists and fanatics in as well? It's just not worth the trouble to police them, and they would be an odious addition to the community.
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,070
@previous (Mindwurms !!4IKKtS9GG)
Because you imply that anyone with strong beliefs can't be objective.
Because you imply that anyone with strong beliefs can't be objective.
Mindwurms !!4IKKtS9GG replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,084
@previous (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)Religious fanaticism and racism =/= just strong beliefs
(Edited 12 seconds later.)
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,089
@previous (Mindwurms !!4IKKtS9GG)
... because you imply that religious fanaticists and racists can't be objective.
Hmmm ok. I kinda get your point.
... because you imply that religious fanaticists and racists can't be objective.
Hmmm ok. I kinda get your point.
Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 17 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,091
there was a group of self-identifying pedos on wikipedia that caused a lot of drama see article for detail -> http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Wikipedo
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 6 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,092
@6,065 (Mindwurms !!4IKKtS9GG)
> Is it wrong to enjoy the attention? (Pic related)
>
> Anyway, if we're going to let self-proclaimed pedophiles edit Wikipedia, why not let self-admitted racists and fanatics in as well? It's just not worth the trouble to police them, and they would be an odious addition to the community.
They are already in the community, but you seem to have missed that memo.
> Is it wrong to enjoy the attention? (Pic related)
>
> Anyway, if we're going to let self-proclaimed pedophiles edit Wikipedia, why not let self-admitted racists and fanatics in as well? It's just not worth the trouble to police them, and they would be an odious addition to the community.
They are already in the community, but you seem to have missed that memo.
(Edited 47 seconds later.)
Fuchs !!4KU9PSdLG joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,103
Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,116
Anonymous X joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 36 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,154
The rule is designed to prevent people from editing articles to insert pro-sex-with-kids propaganda. People like this Samantha poster:
http://www.tinychan.org/topic/3992
http://www.tinychan.org/topic/3992
Mindwurms !!4IKKtS9GG replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,168
@previous (X)
99.7% probability Samantha is a male pedo who thinks people will be more receptive to a woman. I didn't read to the end, was it something like "YHBT, oh the lulz!"
99.7% probability Samantha is a male pedo who thinks people will be more receptive to a woman. I didn't read to the end, was it something like "YHBT, oh the lulz!"
Anonymous X replied with this 15 years ago, 30 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,209
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
What's wrong with that dude's leg?
What's wrong with that dude's leg?
Mindwurms !!4IKKtS9GG replied with this 15 years ago, 50 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #6,211
Anonymous Z-2 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,046
Wikipedia, Commons, and the Wikimedia Foundation all ban users on the mere suspicion of being pedophiles. A number of people were indefinitely blocked simply because they argued against the zero tolerance policy on the grounds that it could easily lead to a witch hunt - which, ironically, it did.
Evidently, in ARBCOM's eyes, if you disagree with Zero Tolerance, you are automatically a self-identified pedophile.
Evidently, in ARBCOM's eyes, if you disagree with Zero Tolerance, you are automatically a self-identified pedophile.
Anonymous Z-2 double-posted this 15 years ago, 39 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,115
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Do you know for fact they were self-identified pedophiles, or just the usual wikitrolls attempting to stir up another shitstorm?
Do you know for fact they were self-identified pedophiles, or just the usual wikitrolls attempting to stir up another shitstorm?
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Anonymous X replied with this 15 years ago, 54 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,117
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Was this you?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ismouton
Was this you?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ismouton
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,121
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,134
@5,777 (cccuuunnttt !nIGga.SL0w)
I'm happily surprised to hear you sound reasonable about this subject.
I'm happily surprised to hear you sound reasonable about this subject.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 56 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,136
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC replied with this 15 years ago, 36 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,138
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 41 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,140
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,143
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,147
@previous (totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC)
Maybe "on paper", but it's hard to believe someone willing to spend enough time on ANT to beccome a wiseguy would not also be a pedophile.
Maybe "on paper", but it's hard to believe someone willing to spend enough time on ANT to beccome a wiseguy would not also be a pedophile.
Anonymous X replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,148
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC replied with this 15 years ago, 14 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,149
@7,147 (A)
Most of the topics there are pretty interesting. I used to post on AT and I'm not a pedophile.
Most of the topics there are pretty interesting. I used to post on AT and I'm not a pedophile.
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC double-posted this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,150
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,153
@7,149 (totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC)
There was a small window of time when that was true. Before and after that time, even threads that have no relation to pedophilia can start to drift towards it (the threads that get more than say 10 replies).
There was a small window of time when that was true. Before and after that time, even threads that have no relation to pedophilia can start to drift towards it (the threads that get more than say 10 replies).
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,158
@previous (A)
I really don't mind reading some topics related to pedophilia. I'm very interested in the human condition, and I love learning about strange sexual practices.
I really don't mind reading some topics related to pedophilia. I'm very interested in the human condition, and I love learning about strange sexual practices.
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,161
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
It doesn't matter if gay people cause harm or not, that's not the point.
It doesn't matter if gay people cause harm or not, that's not the point.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 53 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,163
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.
Battle not with monsters, lest ye become a monster, and if you gaze into the abyss, the abyss gazes also into you.
Anonymous X replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,168
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 40 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,170
@7,158 (totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC)
> "If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth. "
> — Joseph Goebbels
Honestly, I have become more tolerant to pedophilia after the time I've spent at AT, not that it's completely a bad thing. But I can't see how someone who would have to have spent even more time to become a wiseguy would not have been more influenced by this than me.
> "If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth. "
> — Joseph Goebbels
Honestly, I have become more tolerant to pedophilia after the time I've spent at AT, not that it's completely a bad thing. But I can't see how someone who would have to have spent even more time to become a wiseguy would not have been more influenced by this than me.
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,173
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
You shouldn't hate someone based on their thoughts, it's just not rational. Right now, I'm thinking about killing some, but you would never call me a murderer.
You shouldn't hate someone based on their thoughts, it's just not rational. Right now, I'm thinking about killing some, but you would never call me a murderer.
Anonymous X replied with this 15 years ago, 34 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,175
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC replied with this 15 years ago, 41 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,176
@7,170 (A)
I don't believe that any amount of exposure to pedophiles can ever make turn someone into a pedophile.
I don't believe that any amount of exposure to pedophiles can ever make turn someone into a pedophile.
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,178
@7,175 (X)
I'm thinking about this stupid fucking cunt who taunted a dying child. Give me a moment to find some links.
I'm thinking about this stupid fucking cunt who taunted a dying child. Give me a moment to find some links.
Anonymous X replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,187
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC replied with this 15 years ago, 31 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,188
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
No you weren't. You were speaking out against pedophiles, not child molester's.
No you weren't. You were speaking out against pedophiles, not child molester's.
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC double-posted this 15 years ago, 22 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,189
Anonymous X replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,192
@previous (totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC)
Sure, sure. I still harbor murderous intent toward the cop who pepper sprayed my sister five years ago...
Sure, sure. I still harbor murderous intent toward the cop who pepper sprayed my sister five years ago...
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC replied with this 15 years ago, 31 seconds later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,194
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,202
Anonymous X replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,203
@7,194 (totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC)
> Why did he do that?
Well, my sister took a bunch of sleeping pills in a quasi-suicide attempt. I drove her to the ER where they gave her a bunch of charcoal. Rather then be kept under supervision for a couple of days, she decided to leave. So she got dressed and tried to leave the ER. I alerted the doctor, who called security on her. Security was three guys. My sister at the time weighed about 110 pounds. Two of the cops grabbed her arms which made my sister start screaming. The third cop took out his pepper spray and blasted her in the face.
> Why did he do that?
Well, my sister took a bunch of sleeping pills in a quasi-suicide attempt. I drove her to the ER where they gave her a bunch of charcoal. Rather then be kept under supervision for a couple of days, she decided to leave. So she got dressed and tried to leave the ER. I alerted the doctor, who called security on her. Security was three guys. My sister at the time weighed about 110 pounds. Two of the cops grabbed her arms which made my sister start screaming. The third cop took out his pepper spray and blasted her in the face.
totoforhire !!hWKWsQ1mC replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,215
@7,202 (A)
That's different, and you know it. No one is getting Stockholm syndrome from posting on a chan.
That's different, and you know it. No one is getting Stockholm syndrome from posting on a chan.