Minichan

Topic: RE: Should reading lolicon be illegal?

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #312

In light of this news item at SankakuComplex:

Lolicon illegal in Sweden

What is your opinion on this kind of law? Do you believe it should a crime to read a comic?
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
Yes 10 34%
No 18 62%
Undecided 1 3%

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later[^] [v] #5,685

Yes.

jump !VIfloDyEYo joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #5,694

@previous (B)
Ok, Mubarak.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #5,736

I could give one fuck less.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #5,741

What the fuck is the "RE:" for? Are you worried we'll assume the headline is irrelevant to the topic?

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #5,742

@previous (E)
its short for REtard lolol

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,780

Governments are overstepping their authority.

psychopath !PSYCHOhc32 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #5,905

Fuck you, Sweden. First you open the borders to filthy negros, and now this? I am disappointed in that once great nation of great people. At least Japan still cherishes racial purity and logic.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 10 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,064

As of this post, eight people voted yes, reading a comic should be a crime. Assuming you're serious, perhaps you'd like to explain your reasoning.

Allan Moore's Miracleman features child nudity and visual references to underaged sexual abuse. Do you believe the series should be banned, and that anyone who owns a copy should be arrested? If yes, please elaborate.

Anonymous B replied with this 15 years ago, 11 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,085

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Not much given what passes as "good" around here

@previous (A)
> perhaps you'd like to explain your reasoning.
No.

FuckAlms !o7pTU5txUk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,303

Would OP like to clarify why they felt the need to duplicate a post from OTK? I find it rather annoying to see the same threads on multiple websites. :/

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 27 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #7,324

i vote yes because it is funny seeing pedos-in-denial(and proud pedos; can't forget them) rage and whine about theyre legal cp getting taken away.

psychopath !PSYCHOhc32 replied with this 15 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #7,338

@previous (K)
Real paedos won't give a fuck as they already look at child sex abuse porn. All that is changed is that fans of erotic drawings are lumped in with said paedos.

Advi !!3gpAcg/hF joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #7,341

CARTOONS ARE REAL PEOPLE

Anonymous K replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #7,357

case in point, this faggot @7,338 (psychopath !PSYCHOhc32)
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.