Minichan

Topic: ATTN: pedos and MRAs

Anonymous A started this discussion 13 years ago #30,557

How does this make you feel?

Please state your answer in the form of a generalization, anecdote, severe butthurt, or cite your favorite evolutionary psychology writing.

Thanks, thanx.

green joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 10 minutes later[^] [v] #438,682

You twat.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 58 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #438,693

Women are obsolete.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 58 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,713

kook !!32zdfdzi+ joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,728

@previous (D)
very nice

kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,730

@438,693 (C)
As of now, you still need wombs for gestation. They can basically use dna from one women to impregnate another. So yeah.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread331192/pg1

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 28 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,746

> Compares political opponents to pedophiles

> Preemptively calls opposition mad

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 30 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,747

@previous (F)
> so many implications

Anonymous F replied with this 13 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,749

@previous (A)
> Compares opponents to pedophiles
> dont imply things about me dudebro k?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 27 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,764

@previous (F)
> doesn't realize the thread was sincerely addressed to pedos

Grumpy Cat aka. Tard joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 44 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,772

"Please state your answer in the form of a generalization, anecdote, severe butthurt, or cite your favorite evolutionary psychology writing"

Well, typing out of my Internet meme cat character...

Pretty funny, huh? I'm actually jealous of all the tight clothes, pageants and makeup. Really. My parents kept me away from it and the result is suicide-inducing bullying. A tight Monster High shirt that lets you see my every curve or a baggy, old, stained burgundy velvet dress? I'm obviously going to get less bullying and more compliments from the Monster High shirt no matter what. And nobody's gonna stop an adult from wearing kid's clothes, okay? (if you downtalk Monster High, I'll twat u one m8)

(Note: If anyone's curious, I'm 18 but occasionally parents tell me to stop wearing bikinis. Legally, I am able to wear the bikini and move on. After all, it is adult sized...)

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 50 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,773

@438,730 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
We are fairly close to having fully functional artificial wombs, though.

Men and Women, alike, are becoming obsolete.

green replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,774

Doest thou even now.

Anonymous F replied with this 13 years ago, 55 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,775

@438,773 (H)
Humyns are obsolyte. The age of robyts is upon ys.

Grumpy Cat aka. Tard replied with this 13 years ago, 11 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,776

Nope! Kitteh runs teh wurld!!!1!!

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 24 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,783

@438,773 (H)
source?

Anonymous H replied with this 13 years ago, 25 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,788

@previous (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Fine, here is a source for you to to attempt to argue against:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1872204013606398

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 8 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,919

What does this have to do with pedophilia? Do you think a minority of sexual deviants are wholly responsible for the culture-wide objectification of women and girls?

Speaking of the APA, the 2013 version of the DSM acknowledges everything I've been arguing on these boards for years: pedophilia is an immutable orientation and not all pedophiles act on their desires. Quote (DSM 5, p. 698):
Examples of disclosing this paraphilia include candidly acknowledging an intense sexual interest in children and indicating that sexual interest in children is greater than or equal to sexual interest in physically mature individuals. If individuals also complain that their sexual attractions or preferences for children are causing psychosocial difficulties, they may be diagnosed with pedophilic disorder. However, if they report an absence of feelings of guilt, shame, or anxiety about these impulses and are not functionally limited by their paraphilic impulses (according to self-report, objective assessment, or both), and their self-reported and legally recorded histories indicate that they have never acted on their impulses, then these individuals have a pedophilic sexual orientation but not pedophilic disorder.

Adult males with pedophilic disorder may indicate that they become aware of strong or preferential sexual interest in children around the time of puberty — the same time frame in which males who later prefer physically mature partners became aware of their sexual interest in women or men. [...] Pedophilia per se appears to be a lifelong condition. [...] The highest possible prevalence for pedophilic disorder in the male population is approximately 3%-5%. [...] There is some evidence that neurodevelopmental perturbation in utero increases the probability of development of a pedophilic orientation.

The distinction between "pedophilic disorder" and "pedophilic orientation" is comparable to the APA's decision to replace "homosexuality" with "ego-dystonic homosexuality" 30 years ago. It feels good to be on the winning side of history. ^_^

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 6 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,920

i didnt know that loli was 12 i sware

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 9 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,931

@438,919 (I)
severe autism detected

(Edited 33 seconds later.)

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,945

@438,788 (H)
they put uterine cells on a micro chip. interesting
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.