Topic: Obama voters.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY started this discussion 13 years ago #30,515
You voted to reduce your own income. How cool is that?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #438,439
Did Obama raise the prices of McFood? Is this why you hate him now?
Stephen Hawking joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 30 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #438,447
It's no use. Obama voters feed on butthurt. They will happily poison themselves to witness the frustration and suffering of others.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 23 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #438,453
OPMy income has improved so yes I think that is cool. Over all growth is slow but its growth and its a great tyme to borrow money and make cold hard cash on cheep money.
And ya might revue the stock market curve pre and post first Obama election n see the curve. But hey if positive gain bugs ya?
Anonymous C replied with this 13 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #438,455
@previous (Syntax)
> but its growth and its a great tyme to borrow money and make cold hard cash on cheep money.
Implying the Fed isn't already locked into keeping interest rates won't be near zero percent for the next decade to stabilize housing markets.
> but its growth and its a great tyme to borrow money and make cold hard cash on cheep money.
Implying the Fed isn't already locked into keeping interest rates won't be near zero percent for the next decade to stabilize housing markets.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #438,458
@438,453 (Syntax)
I am so glad that Obama has redistributed the wealth from the lower and middle class to the upper class. This is the hope and change we've been asking for.
I am so glad that Obama has redistributed the wealth from the lower and middle class to the upper class. This is the hope and change we've been asking for.
Annoying Old Woman joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #438,465
Syntax replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,481
@previous (Annoying Old Woman)
Ah Good to see ya here
@438,455 (C)
WoW you mean the Fed wood do such? Wonderful.
Ah Good to see ya here
@438,455 (C)
WoW you mean the Fed wood do such? Wonderful.
Anonymous C replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,522
@previous (Syntax)
> WoW you mean the Fed wood do such? Wonderful.
Wonderful like Japan's been in this last 20 years.
> WoW you mean the Fed wood do such? Wonderful.
Wonderful like Japan's been in this last 20 years.
Syntax replied with this 13 years ago, 13 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,526
@previous (C)
Ah well that experimental 1997 consumption tax jump, was was was just beyond stupid. Banks became suspect so people did a run on the banks n ripped out savings. I R no expert on fail of Japan and yes there are similarities to USA.
We have the Fed propping up economy and in Eu they have Germany keeping a few countries afloat. But Walter for some reason posted that USA people in general are worse off. Odd how that is not true for his Dad n biz his dad is in.
Ah well that experimental 1997 consumption tax jump, was was was just beyond stupid. Banks became suspect so people did a run on the banks n ripped out savings. I R no expert on fail of Japan and yes there are similarities to USA.
We have the Fed propping up economy and in Eu they have Germany keeping a few countries afloat. But Walter for some reason posted that USA people in general are worse off. Odd how that is not true for his Dad n biz his dad is in.
Annoying Old Woman replied with this 13 years ago, 36 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,543
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 21 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,564
to be honest walter most of the people who voted obama had no legal income to begin with so they be fine, yo
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,569
Yes, I am okay with higher taxes.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,629
yes, because taxes make civilization work you little neckbeard
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,631
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,632
@438,629 (H)
Taxes on the lower and middle classes and not on the wealthiest Americans? You sound like a Republican.
Taxes on the lower and middle classes and not on the wealthiest Americans? You sound like a Republican.
Anonymous G replied with this 13 years ago, 3 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #438,676
@previous (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
> voting for Obama means you support every single decision he makes
> Walter
> opinion
> voting for Obama means you support every single decision he makes
> Walter
> opinion