Minichan

Topic: Is "pedosexuality" an actual legitimate orientation?

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #3,007

Or is it something made up by pedophiles to make themselves look like they're being persecuted?

Nega !.Y4iB6KrDo joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #54,952

There.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

The Owl !yshAAUvyds joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #54,957

> Is "pedosexuality" an actual legitimate orientation?

No.

Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 12 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #54,977

fuck off

Deckard Cain !xhERPesk0k joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 56 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #55,044

@previous (Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw)

> fuck off

This. Seriously.

advi !!3gpAcg/hF joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #55,062

'child' is not a gender.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #55,090

Well, pedophiles exist and they are attracted to children. So while it's distasteful, it might be a true sexuality.

jump !VIfloDyEYo joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #55,098

Its pedo-america.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 14 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #55,099

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
I doesn't really matter, either way. Calling it by certain terms doesn't change anything.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW double-posted this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #55,110

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/sexual_orientation

Leonidas !nBpim1wazU joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #55,123

No. This image explains my digust with pedosexuality.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 35 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #55,124

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Causes who problems?

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW double-posted this 15 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #55,125

@55,123 (Leonidas !nBpim1wazU)
You can be disgusted by it, but that doesn't change anything.

The Owl !yshAAUvyds replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #55,129

I changed my mind.

Yes, but it should not be accepted as a legitimate lifestyle. Are maddie must b sayfe as owses

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 51 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #55,131

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)

that's just a little bit pedantic

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #55,134

no to title, yes to the body

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #55,138

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)

because a less emotionally striking word is more neutral, 'pedophile' basically means 'child molester' as it is

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #55,142

Pedophiles are persecuted.

Leonidas !nBpim1wazU replied with this 15 years ago, 16 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,168

@previous (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)

> Pedophiles are persecuted.

Not as much as furries!

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 37 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,170

@previous (Leonidas !nBpim1wazU)
I know that you're trying to be funny. But that's just not true

Leonidas !nBpim1wazU replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,174

@previous (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)

Try it. Become a furry and see if they persecute you.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,178

@previous (Leonidas !nBpim1wazU)
They would, just not as much as a pedophile. I really wish that I was a furry, they seem to have such a fun fetish.

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 1 second later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,179

@55,168 (Leonidas !nBpim1wazU)

kinda the same principle but it's different because furries actually deserve it

protip !tyLmN8C16E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,186

lol

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 12 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,187

@55,178 (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)

lol it is

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,189

@previous (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
I've even tried to induce arousal by using furry artwork, but it didn't happen.

Leonidas !nBpim1wazU replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,193

@55,179 (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)

> kinda the same principle but it's different because furries actually deserve it

From what I heard from the pedophiles on Minichan (e.g. jump), pedophiles can't control it. Like being gay.

Furries have a choice I think. Umm... maybe I'm wrong and furries can't control it either, I dunno maybe it's like being otherkin. Yanno, born dat way?

Leonidas !nBpim1wazU double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,195

@55,189 (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)

> I've even tried to induce arousal by using furry artwork, but it didn't happen.

No no no no no. Furry artwork is not for masturbation purposes. It is for fun. It is deeply spiritual for furries. Take this for instance, a comedy-drama-romance, chiefly comedy.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,197

@previous (Leonidas !nBpim1wazU)
Masturbation is spiritual to me.

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 55 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,199

@55,189 (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)

does it repel you in some way or does it just not work for you? :p

The Owl !yshAAUvyds replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,202

Everything pornographic turns me on. It's strange

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,203

@55,195 (Leonidas !nBpim1wazU)

meh, it's not always smut but it's always sexual, about as much of a lifestyle as a dirty magazine in your closet.

Homestar !RUNNERV7vk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,206

@55,193 (Leonidas !nBpim1wazU)
Can you really help ANY attraction? I can't make myself not like chocolate... I don't think being a furry is something you can choose to turn on or off either.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,210

@55,199 (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
No, I love furry artwork! It just doesn't turn me on.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW double-posted this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,214

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
that's true, but we do it with so many other terms. Retard, Indian, barren, bastard.

SQUARED :3 !L.....AlN. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,215

<trufax>Exclusive paedophilia is a sexual orientation and non-exclusive paedophilia is a fetish.</trufax>

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,218

@55,210 (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)

do you think it's cute? do you prefer the more realistic kind or more fantasized?

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,220

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
We say handicapped, handicapable, or differently abled.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW double-posted this 15 years ago, 32 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,221

@55,218 (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
I think it's very cute and fun. Isn't most of it unrealistic because it's a drawing?

Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,223

@55,220 (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)
The word handicapable is in itself retarded.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,225

@previous (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
I know, but people still use it.

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,235

@55,221 (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)

i feel the same way, and I was referring to scenes, poses, artstyles etc

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,236

@previous (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
Well, I prefer sexy and flirty pics instead of full on sexual situations. I also usually think that artwork where the subject is a female is usually much more beautiful.

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,245

@previous (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)

i totally agree, gay/male pictures are always raunchy and distasteful which bothers me a lot; it's fun to appreciate a beautiful looking piece instead of just fapping to it.

Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,248

@previous (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
You are lying.
Cease and desist.
Immediately.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,249

@55,245 (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
Also with the male pics, they usually have giant, veiny cocks and and shoot out ridiculous amounts of semen. Which isn't sexy to me at all.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW double-posted this 15 years ago, 22 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,250

@55,248 (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
How do you feel about this issue?

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,251

@55,248 (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)

what

Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,254

@55,250 (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)
I can definitely appreciate sensual, soft core erotica being... erotic.
But I don't see anything cute/interesting in fur. Alas.

@previous (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
nvm, I misread you

(Edited 3 minutes later.)

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,255

@previous (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
I find it all so adorable. I would really like to go to a furry convention.

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,260

@55,249 (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)

lol. If not that it's always about girly faggots whoring themselves out. Bleh.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,263

@previous (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
It often is though.

(Edited 17 seconds later.)

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,268

@previous (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)

yeah, fucking disgusting.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,275

@previous (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
Money shots are never for a women's pleasure. But then again, I never masturbate to regular porn either.

(Edited 10 seconds later.)

Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,280

@previous (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)
> Money shots are RARELY for a women's pleasure

fixed

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,281

@previous (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
Almost no women enjoy that.

Homestar !RUNNERV7vk replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,285

@previous (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)
You'll be surprised. Many people into D/s and humiliation are.

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 59 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,286

@55,275 (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)

absolutely; most of the pics I save are just girls in cute poses, pinups etc, it's a lot more cute and less gross...

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW replied with this 15 years ago, 29 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,287

@55,285 (Homestar !RUNNERV7vk)
By moneyshot, I just meant watching the act of ejaculation, particularly in pornography. Not necessarily on the face or body.

totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,288

@55,286 (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
That's what I like. Cute furry pics of female hybrids in nice outfits. But, I only ever masturbate to tickling videos or erotica.

advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #55,292

@previous (totoforhire !!pNz4kjfeW)

well yeah, it's just nice to see such an obscure fetish that's tasteful and beautified instead of just nasty stuff.

(Edited 9 minutes later.)

:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.