Topic: I'm unbanning Matt.
beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao started this discussion 13 years ago #29,040
Shit's boring when Green's in gaol.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #426,454
Yes, please.
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 46 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #426,455
Sure go ahead.
Maybe he'll stop begging to be let back in Larkin's website.
Maybe he'll stop begging to be let back in Larkin's website.
beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 7 seconds later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #426,456
Oh I think China is still banned. How to unban.
Meta !PARAdoxiHw joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 22 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #426,463
@previous (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
I don't think China was ever really banned, he posted just the other day.
I don't think China was ever really banned, he posted just the other day.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 9 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #426,465
peepee and poopoo in my five guys swashbuckling macbook purse
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #426,466
Fantastic. I look forward to the entire front page being about leather bags and poop.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #426,468
Meta !PARAdoxiHw replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #426,469
beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #426,470
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #426,471
TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 7 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #426,472
Lol, Green ends up in prison, so Matt gets unbanned to fill in the gap. Love it, LOVE IT!
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #426,473
@426,468 (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
How very Chris Chan.
@426,469 (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
Indeed. Green is far more entertaining, he innovates. Matt just stays the same.
@426,470 (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
I'm not mad... Just disappointed.
How very Chris Chan.
@426,469 (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
Indeed. Green is far more entertaining, he innovates. Matt just stays the same.
@426,470 (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
I'm not mad... Just disappointed.
beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #426,475
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> Indeed. Green is far more entertaining, he innovates. Matt just stays the same.
However, consider that Matt has been a functioning alcoholic and Internet troll for decades. Green's star burns far too brightly to last; he has no staying power. We can't rely on him. For the stability of the fora, we need at least one drunken mess on here at all times, and Green's legal troubles could threaten the entire fora if we don't adapt. Thanks. Thanks.
> Indeed. Green is far more entertaining, he innovates. Matt just stays the same.
However, consider that Matt has been a functioning alcoholic and Internet troll for decades. Green's star burns far too brightly to last; he has no staying power. We can't rely on him. For the stability of the fora, we need at least one drunken mess on here at all times, and Green's legal troubles could threaten the entire fora if we don't adapt. Thanks. Thanks.
Anonymous G replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,484
Meta !PARAdoxiHw replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,486
@426,475 (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
Becky, you make a good point. To use a rap analogy, Green is M.C. Hammer, and Matt is Dr. Dre.
Becky, you make a good point. To use a rap analogy, Green is M.C. Hammer, and Matt is Dr. Dre.
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 replied with this 13 years ago, 17 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,488
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 13 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,491
@426,475 (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
@426,486 (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
You are both seriously underestimating Green's endurance. Multiple arrests? He endures. Multiple psychiatric evaluations? He endures. Multiples instances of self-harm? He endures. It will take more than a mere court case to get rid of him.
@426,486 (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
You are both seriously underestimating Green's endurance. Multiple arrests? He endures. Multiple psychiatric evaluations? He endures. Multiples instances of self-harm? He endures. It will take more than a mere court case to get rid of him.
TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,492
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
This. For fuck's sake guys, it's Green we're talking about here.
This. For fuck's sake guys, it's Green we're talking about here.
Meta !PARAdoxiHw replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,508
@426,491 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Yes, but will he be obsessed with a 78 year old man for fifteen years? To put it another way, MAtt has been destroying foræ since Green was in diapers.
Yes, but will he be obsessed with a 78 year old man for fifteen years? To put it another way, MAtt has been destroying foræ since Green was in diapers.
beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,536
@previous (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
This. Matt destroyed forae using Netscape Navigator, ffs.
This. Matt destroyed forae using Netscape Navigator, ffs.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,538
@426,508 (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
@previous (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
Are you secret Matt cultists? Green is clearly more entertaining. He sets fires in his own home!
@previous (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
Are you secret Matt cultists? Green is clearly more entertaining. He sets fires in his own home!
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs replied with this 13 years ago, 8 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,540
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
They're in the pockets of the Wine MAfia, evidently. Ignore them both.
They're in the pockets of the Wine MAfia, evidently. Ignore them both.
beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 55 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,541
@426,538 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Green only walks down to Tesco. Matt's adventures span the globe, and he has caused no fewer than three suicides because of the depth of his trolling. And he's been doing this for 20 years straight.
Green only walks down to Tesco. Matt's adventures span the globe, and he has caused no fewer than three suicides because of the depth of his trolling. And he's been doing this for 20 years straight.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,542
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,543
@426,540 (TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs)
This makes sense. Why has Matt been able to come back time and time again? He's had people on the inside! I mean look at this nonsense. Only somebody on a payroll would say rubbish like that.
This makes sense. Why has Matt been able to come back time and time again? He's had people on the inside! I mean look at this nonsense. Only somebody on a payroll would say rubbish like that.
TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,544
@426,542 (Syntax)
It has been adjourned.
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Exactly! They have infiltrated every level of Minichan's administration. Something needs to be done about this.
It has been adjourned.
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Exactly! They have infiltrated every level of Minichan's administration. Something needs to be done about this.
Anonymous G replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,545
@previous (TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs)
Why would it be adjourned?
I cannot believe people here sometimes, this isn't like some major fraud case where they are waiting for additional evidence. ffs, he smashed a window. They don't adjourn shit like that. Christ almighty, use your brain.
Why would it be adjourned?
I cannot believe people here sometimes, this isn't like some major fraud case where they are waiting for additional evidence. ffs, he smashed a window. They don't adjourn shit like that. Christ almighty, use your brain.
Syntax replied with this 13 years ago, 16 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,550
@426,544 (TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs)
adjourned?
In English I no wot that means but in England I have no clue wot that means.
adjourned?
In English I no wot that means but in England I have no clue wot that means.
Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2 replied with this 13 years ago, 9 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,552
@previous (Syntax)
Means "called off" or "put on hold" when we're talking a meeting or something similar.
Means "called off" or "put on hold" when we're talking a meeting or something similar.
Syntax replied with this 13 years ago, 7 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,555
@previous (Negi Springfield !aeNZeP7XP2)
ah ok thanks
Here as for court it means Ended....Which happens at end of a session and not any single case.
ah ok thanks
Here as for court it means Ended....Which happens at end of a session and not any single case.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,557
@426,545 (G)
My theory is that he shocked then with his craziness so much that they need time to recover.
My theory is that he shocked then with his craziness so much that they need time to recover.
Meta !PARAdoxiHw replied with this 13 years ago, 19 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,577
@426,538 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
If you any evidence of this, I invite you to post legal proof RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW. Thanks.
Until then, let's compare the facts:
MAtt:
Has a postgraduate degree.
Has traveled the world.
Cultured, well-read, erudite bon vivant.
Professionally trained French chef
Fluent in many languages
Two decades of fora trolling experience
Honored by the ICIT as the world's third-greatest troll
Green:
Has half of a high school education
Has traveled to Tesco
Can barely write in English, let alone Chinese or French
Can't even roast a fedora properly without setting off the smoke alarm
Two years of fora trolling experience
Looks like Indy wins again!
If you any evidence of this, I invite you to post legal proof RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW. Thanks.
Until then, let's compare the facts:
MAtt:
Has a postgraduate degree.
Has traveled the world.
Cultured, well-read, erudite bon vivant.
Professionally trained French chef
Fluent in many languages
Two decades of fora trolling experience
Honored by the ICIT as the world's third-greatest troll
Green:
Has half of a high school education
Has traveled to Tesco
Can barely write in English, let alone Chinese or French
Can't even roast a fedora properly without setting off the smoke alarm
Two years of fora trolling experience
Looks like Indy wins again!
Syntax replied with this 13 years ago, 21 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,599
@previous (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
Yet U seem to be missing a great deal of the LATEST from his own words.
I will wait and see if others are up to date on his need to exit China and damn the City he wants to move2 and Y
Yet U seem to be missing a great deal of the LATEST from his own words.
I will wait and see if others are up to date on his need to exit China and damn the City he wants to move2 and Y
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,607
!KThEOwLwbU joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 29 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,613
!KThEOwLwbU double-posted this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,614
@426,545 (G)
The Lord Chief Justice listed the factors that were relevant when considering an application for adjournment:
· A decision whether to adjourn is a decision within the discretion of the trial court. An appellate court will interfere only if very clear grounds for doing so are shown;
· Magistrates should pay great attention to the need for expedition in the prosecution of criminal proceedings;
· Where an adjournment is sought by the prosecution, magistrates must consider both the interest of the defendant in getting the matter dealt with, and the interest of the public that criminal charges should be adjudicated upon, and the guilty convicted as well as the innocent acquitted. With a more serious charge the public interest in there being a trial will carry greater weight. The Lord Chief Justice commented that the courts in England and Wales have addressed applications by the prosecution in a robust fashion because of a perceived need to deal with a culture of adjournment. He added that the courts in NI have not reached the point where such action is either necessary or appropriate;
· Where an adjournment is sought by the accused, the magistrate must consider whether, if it is not granted, he will be able fully to present his defence and, if he will not be able to do so, the degree to which his ability to do so is compromised;
· In considering the competing interests of the parties the magistrate should examine the likely consequences of the proposed adjournment, in particular, its likely length and the need to decide the facts while recollections are fresh;
· The reason that the adjournment is required should be examined and, if it arises through the fault of the party asking for the adjournment, weighted in accordance with the gravity of the fault. If the party seeking the adjournment was not at fault that may favour an adjournment. Likewise, if the party opposing the adjournment has been at fault, that will favour an adjournment;
· The magistrate should take appropriate account of the history of the case, and whether there have been earlier adjournments and at whose request and why. A case listed on the first occasion should proceed unless the court is persuaded by other relevant factors that it should be adjourned; and
· The magistrate should consider the interests of the victim and the desirability of having prosecutions determined on their merits rather than pressing ahead in the absence of witnesses.
The Lord Chief Justice listed the factors that were relevant when considering an application for adjournment:
· A decision whether to adjourn is a decision within the discretion of the trial court. An appellate court will interfere only if very clear grounds for doing so are shown;
· Magistrates should pay great attention to the need for expedition in the prosecution of criminal proceedings;
· Where an adjournment is sought by the prosecution, magistrates must consider both the interest of the defendant in getting the matter dealt with, and the interest of the public that criminal charges should be adjudicated upon, and the guilty convicted as well as the innocent acquitted. With a more serious charge the public interest in there being a trial will carry greater weight. The Lord Chief Justice commented that the courts in England and Wales have addressed applications by the prosecution in a robust fashion because of a perceived need to deal with a culture of adjournment. He added that the courts in NI have not reached the point where such action is either necessary or appropriate;
· Where an adjournment is sought by the accused, the magistrate must consider whether, if it is not granted, he will be able fully to present his defence and, if he will not be able to do so, the degree to which his ability to do so is compromised;
· In considering the competing interests of the parties the magistrate should examine the likely consequences of the proposed adjournment, in particular, its likely length and the need to decide the facts while recollections are fresh;
· The reason that the adjournment is required should be examined and, if it arises through the fault of the party asking for the adjournment, weighted in accordance with the gravity of the fault. If the party seeking the adjournment was not at fault that may favour an adjournment. Likewise, if the party opposing the adjournment has been at fault, that will favour an adjournment;
· The magistrate should take appropriate account of the history of the case, and whether there have been earlier adjournments and at whose request and why. A case listed on the first occasion should proceed unless the court is persuaded by other relevant factors that it should be adjourned; and
· The magistrate should consider the interests of the victim and the desirability of having prosecutions determined on their merits rather than pressing ahead in the absence of witnesses.
Anonymous G replied with this 13 years ago, 8 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,651
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,652
first
Triptych !IupsXZPnnU joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 38 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #426,657
@426,577 (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
What is a postgraduate degree? A master's? So is a bachelor's a graduate degree? what's a PhD? :(
@426,463 (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
Proxies
What is a postgraduate degree? A master's? So is a bachelor's a graduate degree? what's a PhD? :(
@426,463 (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
Proxies
!KThEOwLwbU replied with this 13 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #426,706
Syntax replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #426,719
@previous (!KThEOwLwbU)
I R still confused - A full read of wot you posted makes it appear in Greens case that
> The magistrate should consider the interests of the victim and the desirability of having prosecutions determined on their merits rather than pressing ahead in the absence of witnesses.
Perhaps the neighbors never thought of making a recording of the god arful noise
So he is off free with no worries?
I R still confused - A full read of wot you posted makes it appear in Greens case that
> The magistrate should consider the interests of the victim and the desirability of having prosecutions determined on their merits rather than pressing ahead in the absence of witnesses.
Perhaps the neighbors never thought of making a recording of the god arful noise
So he is off free with no worries?
Anonymous G replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #426,724
@previous (Syntax)
He will get a very small fine, if anything. He is n benefits, so will pay it off at about £1 a week.
He will get a very small fine, if anything. He is n benefits, so will pay it off at about £1 a week.
TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs replied with this 13 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #426,726
Syntax replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #426,729
@426,724 (G)
ah ok
I play the Monopoly game for real over the last few years. Bought houses n condos to rent n lease out- At the Get Go I had one problem with one tenant but since then I have been super careful and no problems since.
ah ok
I play the Monopoly game for real over the last few years. Bought houses n condos to rent n lease out- At the Get Go I had one problem with one tenant but since then I have been super careful and no problems since.
Anonymous G replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #426,730
@426,726 (TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs)
Probably. He'd turn up dressed as Bella to was some graffiti off a slide.
Probably. He'd turn up dressed as Bella to was some graffiti off a slide.
Anonymous G double-posted this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #426,731
@426,729 (Syntax)
If I was a landlord, I would beat the shit out of anyone that dissed my property. True story.
If I was a landlord, I would beat the shit out of anyone that dissed my property. True story.
Syntax replied with this 13 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #426,739
@previous (G)
Well one might feel as such but then you give the person you have beaten up one hell of an out in court to take you for one hell of a lot of money.
Well one might feel as such but then you give the person you have beaten up one hell of an out in court to take you for one hell of a lot of money.