Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: why canada is better than the usa or uk

Anonymous A started this discussion 13 years ago #28,630

Externally hosted image

beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #422,465

Externally hosted imageYes, because people should expect this from a cup of coffee.

beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao double-posted this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #422,466

Externally hosted imageWhat a crazy litigious country!

beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao triple-posted this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #422,467

Externally hosted imageWho hasn't had to get skin grafts from spilling coffee? God, people will sue over anything.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #422,468

Externally hosted image@422,465 (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
@422,466 (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
@previous (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
Natural selection.

TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #422,469

@422,465 (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)

> Yes, because people should expect this from a cup of coffee.

Well... yeah? Boiling beverages will generally cause burns.

beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao replied with this 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #422,471

@previous (TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs)
http://www.lectlaw.com/files/cur78.htm
During discovery, McDonalds produced documents showing more than 700 claims by people burned by its coffee between 1982 and 1992. Some claims involved third-degree burns substantially similar to Liebecks. This history documented McDonalds' knowledge about the extent and nature of this hazard.

McDonalds also said during discovery that, based on a consultants advice, it held its coffee at between 180 and 190 degrees fahrenheit to maintain optimum taste. He admitted that he had not evaluated the safety ramifications at this temperature. Other establishments sell coffee at substantially lower temperatures, and coffee served at home is generally 135 to 140 degrees.

Further, McDonalds' quality assurance manager testified that the company actively enforces a requirement that coffee be held in the pot at 185 degrees, plus or minus five degrees. He also testified that a burn hazard exists with any food substance served at 140 degrees or above, and that McDonalds coffee, at the temperature at which it was poured into styrofoam cups, was not fit for consumption because it would burn the mouth and throat. The quality assurance manager admitted that burns would occur, but testified that McDonalds had no intention of reducing the "holding temperature" of its coffee.

Plaintiffs' expert, a scholar in thermodynamics applied to human skin burns, testified that liquids, at 180 degrees, will cause a full thickness burn to human skin in two to seven seconds. Other testimony showed that as the temperature decreases toward 155 degrees, the extent of the burn relative to that temperature decreases exponentially. Thus, if Liebeck's spill had involved coffee at 155 degrees, the liquid would have cooled and given her time to avoid a serious burn.

After the lawsuit, McDonalds reduced the serving temperature at that location. And right-leaning politicians and businesses had a new poster child for tort reform... so we could take away the right of a jury of peers to assess damages as they see fit, and begin partially compensating people with severe injuries and fully compensating those who are lucky enough to escape with less.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #422,480

> better than USA
Yes, of course.
> or UK
This is going a bit far.

Triptych !IupsXZPnnU joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #422,481

@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Nah. I've been able to find exactly one establishment with good poutine here. And it costs £8. Clearly inferior to Canada.

TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs replied with this 13 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #422,482

@previous (Triptych !IupsXZPnnU)
Consider visiting Foxtrot Oscar in Chelsea. Thanks.

Triptych !IupsXZPnnU replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #422,483

@previous (TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs)
I checked the menu and see no delicious poutine. I feel deceived :(

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #422,512

@422,468 (C)
fuck yeah britain
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.