TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later[^][v]#421,342
True Neutral.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 30 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^][v]#421,350
You Are:
Neutral Evil
Neutral Evil- A neutral evil villain does whatever he can get away with. He is out for himself, pure and simple. He sheds no tears for those he kills, whether for profit, sport, or convenience. He has no love of order and holds no illusion that following laws, traditions, or codes would make him any better or more noble. On the other hand, he doesn't have the restless nature or love of conflict that a chaotic evil villain has. Some neutral evil villains hold up evil as an ideal, committing evil for its own sake. Most often, such villains are devoted to evil deities or secret societies. Neutral evil is the best alignment you can be because you can advance yourself without regard for others. However, neutral evil can be a dangerous alignment because it represents pure evil without honor and without variation.
postmortem joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 8 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^][v]#421,351
Neutral Evil. How about that?
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 44 minutes after the original post[^][v]#421,353
postmortem replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^][v]#421,354
@previous (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
Hey, I answered the questions, and it'swhat I got. I mean it makes sense, I handle most situations in life with a purely logical mindset. Cupcake is really the only deviation from that norm, and that's only because she's such a specific desire. It's hard for me to let go of something that I really want, and I will sometimes go to extreme measures to prevent losing that something or someone perhaps even to the point of excess, and irrationality.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^][v]#421,355
Lawful Neutral! Almost lawful good but not quite.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^][v]#421,361
@421,354 (postmortem)
I'm actually pretty distant from my current girlfriend. I haven't talked to her since graduation as we are both rather busy.
postmortem replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^][v]#421,367
@previous (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
It happens. I feel like an open relationship might be practical under those circumstances.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#421,371
@previous (postmortem)
She's too conservative to do that.
postmortem replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#421,373
@previous (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
Oh well, are you content with the situation?
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY replied with this 13 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#421,374
@previous (postmortem)
Kind of, though I wish I could get closer to her again.
squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#421,380
neutral evil. didn't even take the test.
postmortem replied with this 13 years ago, 9 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#421,381
@421,374 (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
Just don't turn into me. You'll be alright, everyone's life is hectic during graduation.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#421,384
@previous (postmortem)
Relax. I had a terrible breakup and I still survived. The court case she used to insult me and my mother helped me get over her.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#421,386
True Neutral.
Gonna go have a Sprite.
postmortem replied with this 13 years ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#421,387
@421,384 (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
Wait, did you post about this before? What was the court case? I remember my ex vaguely threatening legal action against me once, but then almost immediately dropping it. But she actually took you to court? What?
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#421,393
Fuck yeah, Lawful Neutral!
Handel !JwkjmyyOPs joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#421,398
Picked Chaotic Good even before I did the test ended up with:
You Are: Chaotic Evil
Chaotic Evil- A chaotic evil character does whatever his greed, hatred, and lust for destruction drive him to do. He is hot-tempered, vicious, arbitrarily violent, and unpredictable. If he is simply out for whatever he can get, he is ruthless and brutal. If he is committed to the spread of evil and chaos, he is even worse. Thankfully, his plans are haphazard, and any groups he joins or forms are poorly organized. Typically, chaotic evil people can be made to work together only by force, and their leader lasts only as long as he can thwart attempts to topple or assassinate him. Chaotic evil is sometimes called demonic because demons are the epitome of chaotic evil. Chaotic evil is the best alignment you can be because combines self-interest and pure freedom. However, chaotic evil can be a dangerous alignment because it represents the destruction not only of beauty and life but also of the order on which beauty and life depend.
Please if I was Postmortem I would have BURNED that bitch. Literally!
postmortem replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#421,402
@previous (Handel !JwkjmyyOPs)
I hope Cupcake reads that and realizes her alternative options often involve being burned.
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#421,403
@previous (postmortem)
i would buy her extravagant gifts and take her on expensive trips. Also i have a large dong.
her choices include more than broken hands and burns
postmortem replied with this 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#421,404
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
I also took her to expensive places, and bought her extravagent gifts. We were planning a trip to NY prior to ourbreak up. I grabbed her hand on accident once trying to get my phone from her, this isn't actually a huge deal. And I promise you that you could never out romance me, you may be able to afford more, but you will never in your wildest dreams be as thoughtful and sweet as I was when I was at my best.
Handel !JwkjmyyOPs replied with this 13 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#421,405
> I also took her to expensive places, and bought her extravagant gifts.
And look where it all got you, my way would have been easier.
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 13 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#421,407
@421,404 (postmortem) > but you will never in your wildest dreams be as thoughtful and sweet as I was when I was at my best.
this is probably true, i almost never attempt to break my girlfriends hands nor do i allow my self-esteem problems and narcissism to ruin a healthy relationship with drama, accusations and paranoia. I just offer support, trust, faith and love, and don't require constant affirmations of affection, fidelity, or trustworthiness. that covers thoughtful, as for sweet, i've discovered in my life that girls always dump the sweet, overly romantic and needy boys for independent, strong, and self-sufficient men that treat women normally.
women don't want to be put on a pedestal, hoisted into the air, and worshiped. they want to be treated normally, and not feel like their boyfriend is constantly trying way too hard to treat her special. Girls hate that try-so-hard-to-be-the-sweetest-bestest-lovingest-nicest-guy in the world bullshit. it's creepy to be fawned upon, it let's you know that the other person doesn't think they are good enough for you, so, you end up looking for someone who is. someone who treats you like a regular person because you are equals, and not like they have to "make up for" whatever they lack by being super nice, overly thoughtful, and constantly needing to be affirmed.
postmortem replied with this 13 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#421,408
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
Being romantic doesn't mean you think they are better than you. Cupcake also did a lot of incredibly sweet things for me. At one point we both loved eachother a whole lot, and wanted to express it to each other. I know you're just being a dick to me so I'm not all that irritated with you.
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY replied with this 13 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#421,410
@421,387 (postmortem)
Yep. She took me to court because I made some really angry phone calls (no threats to her safety so it got thrown out of court) after the breakup to her because she tried to make out with one of my friend in front of me and my friends. And the next day she would sit with them at lunch despite them hating her so much that the same guy that almost got fucked in front of me went up to me and asked me to get her to fuck off and leave the table. I went ballistic and called her a disgusting fucking hateful psychotic pile of misused carbon of a damn dirty rotten whore that will end up a single mother with a biracial fucking child. And then I dated a working-class mulatto girl to spite her, because she also hated the bitch.
(Edited 41 seconds later.)
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 13 years ago, 32 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#421,415
@421,408 (postmortem) > Being romantic doesn't mean you think they are better than you.
right, because that's what i said.
beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 57 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#421,422
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
Also because postmortem called her a bitch constantly so clearly he doesn't have any ideas about her being better than him.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#421,424
@previous (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
What is your alignment, OP?
beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 29 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#421,425
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 13 years ago, 14 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#421,435
@421,422 (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
well, look, you know as well as i do he is constantly manipulating and taking advantage of people, and he thinks that he's supposed to make her think he thinks she's better than him, because that's how the people on TV do it (over the top grandiose gestures to win her heart, as if all girls require some minimum imaginative, creative investment be made to prove your love). he doesn't actually know how to have a relationship with someone if he's not, 1 wooing her spectacularly, or 2 manufacturing drama so that he has to do 1 again.
when you have based your entire relationship model off of sit-com couples, don't be surprised when you have messy on-again off-again affairs and are constantly trying to prove your love with romantic gestures.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#421,441
As soon as it started asking me questions on treason, I quit. I don't need to jump up on their list.
postmortem replied with this 13 years ago, 9 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#421,444
@421,435 (squeegee !first/o5zA)
You are wrong about me, but your reasoning is sound.
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#421,445
@421,441 (J)
lol, i actually thought the same thing, but i was just selecting the most negative response from all of the questions so if i get PRISM'd i'll have a legal defense.
Fishsticks !xi8/JKFwzo joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#421,500
i tend to see-saw from chaotic good to chaotic neutral; this time i got
Chaotic Good
Chaotic Good- A chaotic good character acts as his conscience directs him with little regard for what others expect of him. He makes his own way, but he's kind and benevolent. He believes in goodness and right but has little use for laws and regulations. He hates it when people try to intimidate others and tell them what to do. He follows his own moral compass, which, although good, may not agree with that of society. Chaotic good is the best alignment you can be because it combines a good heart with a free spirit. However, chaotic good can be a dangerous alignment when it disrupts the order of society and punishes those who do well for themselves.
Law & Chaos:
Law ----- XXX (3)
Neutral - XXXXX (5)
Chaos --- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX (15)
Good & Evil:
Good ---- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX (14)
Neutral - XXXXXXXXXXXXX (13)
Evil ---- XXX (3)
(Edited 33 seconds later.)
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 45 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#421,511
@421,441 (J)
considering this has been going on much longer than this stupid personality test has even been a half-baked thought in the back of its creators mind they dont have enough to spirit you away in the dead of night quite yet.
even if that time comes and you can be gitmoed for a simple thought crime they will either already have had enough to to kidnap you or the list will have an infinite supply of more worthy targets to divert theyre activities upon.
TL;DR: do it faggot
(Edited 1 minute later.)
!KThEOwLwbU joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 6 hours later, 15 hours after the original post[^][v]#421,533