Anonymous A started this discussion 13 years ago#28,405
I had to upgrade because I got a new laptop and couldn't afford the one I have, nonetheless a mac. I like Windows 8 alright, but 1 thing I hate is that my time keeps on going 3 hours behind after I fix it time after time. Besides that, what's all the hoop and holler all about?
> time keeps on going 3 hours behind after I fix it time after time.
You need to set your local for the correct tyme. Example I am on the Pacific Coast. If you are on the East coast? Your laptop is set for PDT currently and changing ONLY THE TYME will not force it to remain.
You need to click on clock and look for that Change date and tyme settings Set Local and from then on you tyme stays correct.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#420,200
They have nothing better to bitch about.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#420,202
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#420,204
I have no reason to complain about it since I have no reason to upgrade.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#420,205
Maybe they can't find anything to like about it, so they hate it.
doctor adam jensen md !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#420,250
I had that in windos 7 so i changed the time server and now it works again!
squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#420,265
because the whole thing revolved around touch and most people's only touch devices are apple devices.
most monitors are still just regular CRTs or ordinary LCDs or whatnot.
i can understand microsoft's move, if they made Windows Surface Touch for tablets as a stand alone OS alongside mouse friendly Flagship Windows PC it would surely fail, so they were forced to continue to integrate the two. since microsoft didn't innovate to scale down their Surface R&D project that focused on Surface for huge screens and table tops instead of something you hold in your hands (that was steve jobs "idea") microsoft fell behind. had microsoft made a hand held touchscreen smartphone with Surface then windows 8 wouldn't have needed to be so silly.
i always skip a version anyway. so far far my luck has held. windows 9 (SP3 most likely) will be amazing
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#420,267
You still get the desktop feature. Everything else is just meant to be an add-on.
> i always skip a version anyway. so far far my luck has held. windows 9 (SP3 most likely) will be amazing
You meant Windows 8.1, which is meant to be the same as Windows 8, but with fixed issues that you Windows 8 h8ers are complaining about.
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 13 years ago, 15 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#420,269
@previous (A)
no, i mean whichever version comes next that microsoft will use to distance itself as far as possible from their previous, disastrous, release.
they'll probably call it Windows Velociraptor because Velociraptors are cool (in the 90s) and they'll hope to appeal to young users to get them hooked on the brand early. microsoft, of course, will miss the mark by a good 10 years (again) at least.
these days Velociraptors are pretty passe.
i do like how they were calling it Windows 7 Ultimate and shit like that though at one point. i was so holding out for Windows 7 Awesome Edition, but that never really materialized. 7 is pretty great, but it's not spectacular enough to ever have a Windows 7 Extreme Edition or anything like that.
And maybe you're right, maybe it will be windows 8.1, but i bet they brand it as "Windows Surface Pro Awesome Edition."
i bet they've been holding onto that one. that'll will play to the rubes.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
squeegee !first/o5zA double-posted this 13 years ago, 28 seconds later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#420,270
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 21 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#420,276
It's actually going to be Windows 8.1 next. Already announced.
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 13 years ago, 9 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^][v]#420,278
@previous (A)
well if it's not named Velociraptor be looking for Windows 8.1 Awesome Edition around christmas time. if i am wrong i will literally allow myself to die as a result of my mortality.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 48 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#420,285
Well, Bill obviously made it the way he wanted to use it. To think about it, he gets paid regardless. He could have made it worse than Vista.
Anonymous C replied with this 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#420,290
@420,288 (advi !!3gpAcg/hF) > Because people expected improvement over previous editions and not Windows 7 with a hibernation hack and a tablet interface bolted on.
And native .iso mounting, and lower resource usage, and better multi-monitor support, and a better task manager, and more.
> Also, Metro looks like ass.
That's just, like, your opinion, man.
doctor adam jensen md !jdTkvovFCQ replied with this 13 years ago, 12 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^][v]#420,350
So, you're implying the next OS will be called Windows 9, when they clearly said 8.1? You the mora.
doctor adam jensen md !jdTkvovFCQ replied with this 13 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#420,402
@previous (A)
no 8.1 is not the next os. it's an update to windows 8 that is bigger than updates for windows normally are. microsoft only releases new os-es every 4 years or so
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 58 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#420,410