Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
I am posting the video in his honor. Also, I know the natural inclination is to just flat out dislike anything postmortem does. But please give him real feedback.
Postmortem !!FVJOHfXUk (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#418,930
@previous (beckyderp !8ElfFaoFao)
I'm sorry you are so opposed to affection. You must have some real issues in your life.
Orange !jAgveukDhA joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#419,026
You didn't go anywhere with your original idea about people having dolls as friends.
I don't really understand what point you were trying to make.
Your dog doesn't love you? OKay, fine, But neither does your doll or tulpa .
(Edited 7 minutes later.)
Postmortem !!FVJOHfXUk (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#419,096
@previous (Orange !jAgveukDhA)
Yeah, I did. Dolls have an inability tolove, and people think it's delusional when people get especially attached to them for that reason. However, although it is more socially acceptable to be attached to a dog, a dog's love is no more real than the doll's. That's the point I was making.
Anonymous B replied with this 13 years ago, 4 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#419,140
@previous (Postmortem !!FVJOHfXUk)
A dog probably can't love in the same way that you and I do. But dogs can feel comfortable with their owner, they can be trusting, etc etc.
For example: My dog and I have a very strong bond. I do love her. She doesn't return the same kind of love, but she trusts me and looks to me (and no one else) for safety and affection. She'd bite anyone who approached me aggressively and is not interested in food (especially not those piece of shit fake cheese slices) during tense moments where she feels protective. I'd say that she loves me, in her own instinct driven way.
Were you just grasping for a topic to make a video on? You really failed with this one. Dog affection and doll affection are worlds apart. You're so goddamn retarded.
(Edited 32 seconds later.)
kook !!32zdfdzi+ joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#419,142
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#419,145
So I thought this was supposed to be some kind of comedy? What was the point?
Postmortem !!FVJOHfXUk (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#419,194
@419,140 (B)
It was in jest, sarcastic, etc. Confirmed for asperger's.
Anonymous B replied with this 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#419,195
@previous (Postmortem !!FVJOHfXUk)
Haha, that video was not in jest you idiot. If it were, you wouldn't continue to argue the same points previously in this thread. Sorry that your premise was stupid, think harder about video topics next time and maybe you won't get shamed by anon B. 8-)
Postmortem !!FVJOHfXUk (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#419,196
@previous (B)
You were curious as to why I didn't expand on the doll thing, and I explained that. Even jest has direction. Work harder on your trolling.
Anonymous B replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#419,197
@previous (Postmortem !!FVJOHfXUk) > You were curious
No, I wasn't.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 8 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#419,198
@419,194 (Postmortem !!FVJOHfXUk)
Yes, that vid was definitely confirmed for asperger's.
If you have to keep defending why you did what you did, then obviously it wasn't very good.
Instead of thinking it was a premium effort, take the criticism and try to do better.
Postmortem !!FVJOHfXUk (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#419,211
@previous (H)
You misunderstood the entire thing morethan you criticized it. Stop actingso superior, it's annoying.
Anonymous B replied with this 13 years ago, 43 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#419,212
@previous (Postmortem !!FVJOHfXUk)
Okay, then we ALL misunderstood it. It is not a good video if literally no one gets it. Try again.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#419,220
If you have a dog that is protective, it is generally good to greet visitors. You acknowledge the visitors, say hello, shake their hands, or whatever in front of your dog. The dog takes its cues from you and knows that this person is okay if you don't react violently.
If your dog still acts protective, you warn the dog off (e.g say "NO" to your dog) in front of your visitor. Again, your dog takes its cues from you and considers this person to be okay to wander around in the house.
This advice is important if you own a dog that is actually capable of hurting a human past the point of just needing some disinfectant. Small dogs generally bark at anything and everything, and they will keep barking if they are are not sure of something.
Protip: Dog vision is shit. Dogs can't identify people like we do. They can't identify people from across the room unless there is a good breeze moving toward them.
Protip: Sometimes dogs will bark because they are happy you are back or because they want to play or because they want attention. Most people who have spent any amount of time around dogs find they can distinguish "happy" barks from "angry" barks. Here is a rough guide.
@OP
You are a complete sociopath who is baffled by the idea that there are other thinking creatures. Even canine thinking eludes you. I'm surprised that you have managed to pretend that other humans are more than merely a series of emotional responses to be manipulated.
Anonymous G replied with this 13 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#419,240
@419,211 (Postmortem !!FVJOHfXUk)
And we certainly don't want to annoy you princess.
Postmortem !!FVJOHfXUk (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 2 days later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#419,584
@419,220 (I)
You can't honestly think that about me.