Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Anonymous A started this discussion 13 years ago#28,254
The Homosexual Agenda is a set of beliefs and objectives designed to promote and even mandate acceptance and approval of homosexuality and homosexual ideology, along with the strategies used to implement such. The goals and means of this movement include indoctrinating students in public school, restricting the free speech of opposition, obtaining special treatment for homosexuals, distorting Biblical teaching and science, and interfering with freedom of association. Advocates of the homosexual agenda seek special rights for homosexuals that other people don't have, such as immunity from criticism (see hate speech, hate crimes). Such special rights will necessarily come at the expense of the rights of broader society. The homosexual agenda is the biggest threat to the right of free speech today.
President Barack Hussein Obama and nearly all Democrat politicians now advocate the homosexual agenda, reflecting the growing financial power of the homosexual network. Obama's self-centered obsession with his own reelection, and fundraising for his campaign, has caused him to create a national political issue out of this, rather than deal with other issues like the economy.
Among all the liberal belief systems, the homosexual ideology is the most self-centered or selfish - unlike the vast charity performed by churches, homosexual charity can be considered an oxymoron.
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia referred to the "so-called homosexual agenda" in Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003) (dissenting opinion).
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 29 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#418,406
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Going to get a bit esoteric here, but I think it has something to do with the energy centers eastern philosophy has called the Chakras. Different parts of the body resonate with different frequencies. Just like our brains can be entrained to a specific frequency, our body can too from sound. They associate the seven chakras with the seven main colors: red, orange, yellow, green blue, indigo, violet. If you take a standard modern major scale, it contains seven notes: C, D, E, F, G, A, B. You could associate one color to each note. You could do the math to calculate which color light waves correspond to which note, and maybe you could consider that the 'resonating chakra.'
(Edited 21 seconds later.)
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#418,407
squeegee joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#418,422
It's called the "democratic" party. Not the democrat party you uneducated hill billy.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#418,425
@previous (squeegee)
Yes but it's fine to refer to them as "Democrat politicians", in the same way it's OK to call them "Tory politicians" here.
squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 30 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#418,430
@previous (D)
not really, calling it the democrat party is something FOX news came up with 10 years ago so they wouldn't have to call it the Democratic Party.
it's actually an insult.
We don't call the GOP the Republic party to try and separate it from it's historical roots. The republicans and their media cohorts are really trying desperately to harm the democrats (and have been ever since the democratic party started gaining traction) any way they possibly can.
even trying to affect a name change for them within their own ranks and trying to spread it to a broader audience.
what's funny though, is how "the democrat party" hangs in your ear. Anyone who isn't a teenager will have been raised on "democratic party" as the title heard on TV and seen in print.
So when i hear someone say "democrat party" i immediately think of red necks, hill billies, and uneducated Sarah Palins (who loved saying 'the democrat party' by the way) splashing around in the middle of a vast ocean they don't understand
Anonymous D replied with this 13 years ago, 7 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#418,431
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
But OP didn't call them the Democrat Party, they just called a member of the party a "Democrat", which is something the Democratic Party themselves do.
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 13 years ago, 16 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#418,435
@previous (D)
you would say a democratic politician, not a democrat politician,
but yes, they are democrats and would say, "i'm a democrat", not "I'm a democratic."
yeah, that's what i'm trying to say, it's the usage and how it sounds funny, like "I am a democratic."
The republican party is full of republicans, and they would say, "I'm a republican," but the democratic party is full of democrats and they would call themselves that.
but FOX news wants to call it the democrat party and say it's full of democrats. it's silly.
it's like they're trying to re-brand democrats by renaming their party something fucking stupid.
i guess they try and make people think democrats call it the democrat party so the democrats sound stupid, but really it's just painfully obvious that the people who use democrat party are expressing major butthurt over something.
(Edited 5 minutes later.)
kook !!32zdfdzi+ joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#418,438
conservapedia
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#418,719
@418,430 (squeegee !first/o5zA) > We don't call the GOP the Republic party to try and separate it from it's historical roots. The republicans and their media cohorts
Do people really believe this?
Morbid joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#418,735