Topic: According to Anonymous K, you can't support eugenics unless you are genetically perfect.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY started this discussion 13 years ago #28,160
If people were genetically perfect, we wouldn't need eugenics, now would we. Stupid fucking anonymous shitposting faggot.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #417,485
> Walter
> opinion
> opinion
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #417,486
Christians will tell you God made Humans in his image.If this is so then God is a Mongolian Idiot.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 32 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #417,487
Anonymous B replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #417,489
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 36 minutes later, 45 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #417,496
How can one support eugenics knowing they're clearly not genetically superior?
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #417,502
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #417,505
squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 24 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #417,510
interestingly enough chromosomal abnormalities may be a huge driving force in evolution. i really wish i could remember all of this in proper detail, but i can't, so you get the squeegee version: So, like, you've got humans all over the place and there's Downs all over the place, and downs babies are all the same. they even all have that same mongoloid look, ok? so, now we go back a few hundred thousand years or whatever and you've got homo habilis or whoever, and what if their Down's baby proved to have great benefits? the benefits would eventually spread rapidly through the population, faster than random mutation. also, because it's not a mutation, and really like a transcription error (or what-the-fuck ever), it wouldn't matter the external selective pressures. a homo habilis down's baby in the sahara would be the same as a homo habilis down's baby in europe.
and look at some of the crazy abilities people with chromosomal abnormalities like down's syndrome can have, like super memory and visual recall and some are highly skilled with numbers and can do insta-math in their abnormal brain.
lot's of errors get made during the process of reproduction if i remember correctly. some bigger than others.
but sexual reproduction with it's retards, and random mutation with it's retards
are what turned a stinking pile of goo 3.5 billion years ago,
into kate upton today. a horrible mutant freak by ancient goo standards.
the best you could do is hold back the advancement of nature,
eugenics would prevent anything good from ever spreading through the gene pool.
(Edited 47 seconds later.)
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #417,538
Eugenics is retarded anyway. Thanks.
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #417,539
Poststarnumberuno joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #417,565
kook !!32zdfdzi+ joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #417,568
kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 13 years ago, 58 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #417,569
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 16 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #417,572
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 32 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #417,574
The problem with eugenics is simple: Human is and will forever be an imperfect lifeform.
Transhuman FTW.
Transhuman FTW.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 9 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #417,639
HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 57 seconds later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #417,640
Anonymous J replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #417,641
kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 23 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #417,646
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #417,685
Anonymous K replied with this 13 years ago, 16 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #417,776
@417,640 (HaikerensGuide !dBGi/iH4eY)
Eugenics is subjective. Seeking to destroy physical human characteristics the eugenicists don't like. It is biased and evil.
Transhumanism is objective. Seeking to destroy all human characteristics with the single exception of consciousness. It's objective and equitable.
Eugenics is subjective. Seeking to destroy physical human characteristics the eugenicists don't like. It is biased and evil.
Transhumanism is objective. Seeking to destroy all human characteristics with the single exception of consciousness. It's objective and equitable.
(Edited 50 seconds later.)
cyndaquil !SidPkmn5sg joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #417,785
o_o