Topic: my review of iron man 3
squeegee started this discussion 13 years ago #27,796
Glad I saw a bootlegAnonymous B joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #414,239
Edit: First.(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 16 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #414,241
Is that shit out yet?
Cathy !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #414,245
So it's not as good as the first or even the second one?
squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #414,275
@previous (Cathy !TGirlYJKXM)
it was better than the second one. i saw that on bootleg too. also i consider the avengers to really be Ironman 3: Ironman and Friends, so really this one is Ironman 4. Can a mod please change the title of this thread to include this new revelation?
it was better than the second one. i saw that on bootleg too. also i consider the avengers to really be Ironman 3: Ironman and Friends, so really this one is Ironman 4. Can a mod please change the title of this thread to include this new revelation?
poptart !!PxOpdG1pW joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #414,370
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
Considering Ironman got paid exponentially more than anyone else in the film, yeah, I'd say it was Ironman 3.
Considering Ironman got paid exponentially more than anyone else in the film, yeah, I'd say it was Ironman 3.