day one of her testimony. here she is discussing with the prosecution all of the various possible things that may have happened.
one of my favorite parts is when she explains that she believes that "coming after somone" means they are being chased. the prosecution then asks her if Alexander "came at her." she respond, "i don't know what you mean."
she is the one who said Alexander came after her in the first place when she was answering jury questions. Apparently she doesn't know the meaning of the things she says, she just says them. I love watching her lie, and then have the prosecution tear her story apart, so she can change her story to explain what really happened and why she lied about it. he was a filthy abusive pedophile control freak who beat her unconscious and forced her to be a sex doll and she killed him in self defense as he was beating her and probably thinking about masturbating to images of children (which the police found no forensic evidence of, by the way) and she didn't want to besmirch his good mormon name.
i think it's great fun watching her squirm under the weight of the evidence and the viciousness of the assault.
the police interviews were, like, so amazing. the interviewer was amazing. he let her dig deep deep holes, and then ask one simple question and she'd change her whole story. at one point they were discussing multiple hypothetical scenarios before narrowing it down to one implausible situation involving masked intruders and harrowing escape. hilarious. absolutely hilarious.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
squeegee !first/o5zA (OP) double-posted this 13 years ago, 17 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^][v]#413,521
during her questioning her defense attorney pretty much just sat back and fiddled with his tie. the look on his face says "she doesn't need my help, she knows what she's doing."
some of her answers really fluster the prosecution. she should have been a lawyer.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 days later, 4 days after the original post[^][v]#414,610
Guilty of first degree murder. I guess the jury didn't buy 30 stab wounds, a gunshot, and almost decapitation as self defense.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 23 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^][v]#414,613
squeegee !first/o5zA (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 4 hours later, 5 days after the original post[^][v]#414,663
so i guess now they have to have a trail to determine if she knew he was going to suffer or die cruelly or whatever they have to do.
I think it was just premeditated murder, she went there with a gun and planned to use it on him. i don't think she meant for him to die cruelly or suffer. i think she thought shooting him in the head would instantly kill him, like in the movies, but she used a .25 caliber round and pretty much just wounded him. then i think he was really hurt bad and was crying out and she realized he could survive and she needed to kill him more, so then she went and got the knife and started stabbing him, probably thinking, like in the movies, that if you stab someone they die instantly. unfortunately it's not as easy as you'd think it is to stab someone to death, and so as she stabbed him down the hallway she finally had to cut his throat so he'd bleed out and die before he could get to the front door.
That is why she brought her own gun, and used his knife. the gun just wasn't enough to put him down, and she had to act quickly and viciously to keep him from escaping. so i don't think she planned the stabbing part of it, necessarily, or the big mess. I think she shot him in the shower, which is why there is no "gunshot splatter." she probably figured the shower would catch the blood and keep herself clean.
best laid plans, no?
Syntax replied with this 13 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^][v]#414,667
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
Perhaps you missed the interview after the verdict?
squeegee !first/o5zA (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^][v]#414,669
@previous (Syntax)
no, i just got home. i'm about to look for videos of the verdict being read. i want to see the look on her face when they say murder in the first.
i wonder if she looks surprised, or angry, or if she grieves for herself. i bet it's stone cold, like she knew what was coming.
> she wants to die quickly
lol, wow, that's a nice ploy. try and make people think she prefers the death penalty so they'll give her life.
bullshit. We'll see if she declines her appeals and by how hard she fights death row if she really believes that.
Syntax replied with this 13 years ago, 12 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^][v]#414,672
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
Total flat face on verdict.
Well of course she might be lying? Ceems that has not so much worked for her.
CNN does a good job of running and re-running n more re-runs of Jodi. They probably will get two more one hour specials out of that trial.