Minichan

Topic: 15-year-old-kills-herself-after-rape-photos-go-viral

Anonymous A started this discussion 13 years ago #27,376

(Edited 7 minutes later by a moderator.)

kook !!32zdfdzi+ joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later[^] [v] #409,972

Is this a cp request?

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #409,973

lol, welcome to So you want a permaban.

Round 1.

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 26 seconds later, 6 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #409,975

Ban and delete thread mods

Anonymous C replied with this 13 years ago, 33 seconds later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #409,976

@previous (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
but but

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 50 seconds later, 8 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #409,977

yay! Who did it?

Anonymous C replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #409,978

@previous (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
@OP is mountainman, who else :)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 40 seconds later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #409,979

you guys are no fun

Anonymous C replied with this 13 years ago, 38 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #409,980

@previous (A)
this is minichan, no fun allowed. get the fuck out

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 57 seconds later, 13 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #409,981

@409,979 (A)
Sorry that you cant ped out here

kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 13 years ago, 25 seconds later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #409,983

@409,978 (C)
Not surprised at all

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 39 seconds later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #409,984

Image went missing@409,980 (C)
okay

!KThEOwLwbU joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 19 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #410,198

That poor girl :(

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #410,200

@409,983 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
I'm sure he was just reading about this poor loli purely for academic purposes. Just like his expert opinions on Miss Freeman.

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 13 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #410,210

@previous (E)
He was just showing us his Christian love

Harley !bl2QuinnOY joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #410,234

Wtf

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #410,236

@previous (Harley !bl2QuinnOY)
MM asked for child porn, and then a mod edited the topic

(Edited 24 seconds later.)

Harley !bl2QuinnOY replied with this 13 years ago, 56 seconds later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #410,237

@previous (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Ugh. What a pathetic thing to do.

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #410,240

@previous (Harley !bl2QuinnOY)
He's also anon c in this thread. Because its okay for a public school to spend tax money on religious, abstinence only lectures, and its also okay to request child porn.

http://minichan.org/topic/27389

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 19 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,421

@410,200 (E)
> 15yo
> loli
no

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,422

@410,240 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
> Because its okay for a public school to spend tax money on religious, abstinence only lectures
> implying its okay for a public school to spend money on irreligious, sex instruction classes

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,430

@410,421 (A)
An video of an underage gang rape. I enjoy that Christian love

kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 13 years ago, 21 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,431

@410,422 (A)
It is okay. Because its education and not religion.

!KThEOwLwbU replied with this 13 years ago, 12 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,433

@410,422 (A)

nobody needs instruction to have sex its pretty easy to figure out

everyone needs instruction to have safe sex because otherwise they will have unsafe sex and spread disease and babbies

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,435

@previous (!KThEOwLwbU)
How is this a hard concept?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 28 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,436

@410,430 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
are you suggesting that people here actually have the video? you are such a sperg

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 13 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,438

@410,431 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
the fuck?
both are education

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 20 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,439

@410,436 (A)
It doesnt matter, you asked for it, and called it ruining fun when you were shot down. You're a terrible person.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 41 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,443

@410,433 (!KThEOwLwbU)
> everyone needs instruction to have safe sex because otherwise they will have unsafe sex and spread disease and babbies

but that's immediately and obviously wrong...

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 33 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,444

@410,438 (A)
No they arent. Its not education to tell teen girls that their parents hate them if they are allowed to be on birth control. This speaker also said that she can look at girls and tell when they are promiscuous.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 1 second later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,445

@410,439 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
> it doesnt matter
you truly are the stupidest person on the chans

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 17 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,446

@410,443 (A)
No it isnt.

kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 13 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,447

@410,445 (A)
You are a pervert who pretends to be holy.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,448

@410,444 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Yes, they are both education. This is impossible to deny. You just don't like one of the forms of education. But guess what? Other people don't like your favored form of education!

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 13 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,450

@410,446 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Yes, it is. If you can not see such an immediately apparent truth, i genuinely pity you.

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 22 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,451

@410,448 (A)
No they arent. you cannot look at someones face and tell if they fuck. That is a matter of opinion and not science you pedophilic hypocrite.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 19 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,452

@410,447 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
> people pretending on the internet

grow up

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 13 years ago, 55 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,453

@410,451 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
> abstinence only sexual education isn't education

hurr durr i am stupid but you have to listen to me

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,454

@410,452 (A)
More child sex fantasy? How pure. didnt you once say that thinking about a sin is just as harmful as committing it?

kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 13 years ago, 23 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,455

@410,453 (A)
You cannot tell if someone fucks by their appearance. you sound like an idiot.

!KThEOwLwbU replied with this 13 years ago, 50 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,458

@410,443 (A)

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-Teen-Sex-Ed.html

Strong evidence suggests that comprehensive approaches to sex education help young people both to withstand the pressures to have sex too soon and to have healthy, responsible and mutually protective relationships when they do become sexually active.[23]

• A November 2007 report found that “two-thirds of the 48 comprehensive programs that supported both abstinence and the use of condoms and contraceptives for sexually active teens had positive behavioral effects.” Many either delayed or reduced sexual activity, reduced the number of sexual partners, or increased the use of condoms or other contraceptives.[24]

• There is no evidence to date that abstinence-only-until-marriage education delays teen sexual activity. Moreover, research shows that abstinence-only strategies may deter contraceptive use among sexually active teens, increasing their risk of unintended pregnancy and STIs.[23]

• A 2007 congressionally mandated study found that federally-funded abstinence-only programs have no beneficial impact on young people’s sexual behavior.[23]

• Leading public health and medical professional organizations, including the American Medical Association, the American Nurses Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Public Health Association, the Institute of Medicine and the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine, support a comprehensive approach to educating young people about sex.[23]

• Although there is no evidence indicating that federally-funded abstinence-only-until-marriage education is effective, a recent randomized controlled trial found that in specific cases, abstinence-only education programs that are specifically tailored to the local community and do not criticize contraceptives nor advocate abstinence until marriage can be effective in delaying sexual debut among younger teens.[25]

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,461

@previous (!KThEOwLwbU)
There was no point in doing that. His mind has been warped. He's perfectly fine with condemning sex education, while at the same time trying to fuck kids. I think part of it is that the education makes them harder to trick and manipulate.

!KThEOwLwbU replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,462

@previous (kook !!32zdfdzi+)

i am just wondering what his response to a professional study that contradicts him 100% is

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,463

@previous (!KThEOwLwbU)
Sticking his fingers in his ears and praying

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,464

@410,458 (!KThEOwLwbU)
> everyone needs instruction to have safe sex because otherwise they will have unsafe sex and spread disease and babbies
> will
> if even one person that didn't receive sexual instruction from the state did not have unsafe sex then you would be wrong
> you are wrong

kook !!32zdfdzi+ replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,465

@previous (A)
Yes because we dont want to lower the risk of children having children, that the state has to pay for. Dont you hate paying taxes on that?

kook !!32zdfdzi+ double-posted this 13 years ago, 59 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,466

@410,464 (A)
MM why is it wrong to teach children safe sex, but okay for you and pedo priests to try and have sex with them?

kook !!32zdfdzi+ triple-posted this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,467

MM why do you blame society and not the child molesters for fucking up their kid victims, but you also support tax payer dollars to go to programs that teach kids that sex will make them dirty?

kook !!32zdfdzi+ quadruple-posted this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #410,468

@410,452 (A)
Why do you call me immature, but support grown men when they say that adult priests were seduced by children?

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 10 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #410,520

@410,464 (A)
But those studies say that there's more chance of kids practicing safe sex when educated...

By your logic, it's okay to not tell people to steal things as long as one person doesn't do it without bring told not to.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx double-posted this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #410,521

@410,468 (kook !!32zdfdzi+)
Because it's his biggest fantasy that a little girl will come into his church and initiate something.

Poor Mountie is lonely. :(

Anonymous E replied with this 13 years ago, 4 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #410,579

@410,464 (A)
Goddamn you are retarded

HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 23 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #410,844

Abstinence-only rape videos help prevent statist decadence.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.