Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 3 minutes later[^][v]#407,595
> But when asked whether they agreed with the statement, "Breathing air in a room today where people smoked yesterday can harm the health of infants and children," only 65 percent of nonsmokers and 43 percent of smokers answered "yes."
sounds pretty scientific
> he adds, but notes that he is not aware of any studies directly linking third-hand smoke to disease [as opposed to second-hand smoke, which has been associated with disease].
nevermind. it's not, it's about feelings. He feels that "third-hand smoke" is dangerous, so, let's ask some laymen to weigh in!
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 15 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^][v]#407,734
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
How else would you conduct a scientific study?
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^][v]#407,759
@previous (C)
let me go search for the un-particle by asking my neighbors if they think it can be detected.
i shouldn't, you know, develop a hypothesis and test it or anything. i'll just say something that sounds believable.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 13 years ago, 36 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#407,769
@previous (squeegee !first/o5zA)
And that's how you science properly.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#408,097
> Scientific American. > Non-scientific sensationalist "study" > War is peace.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#408,098
The article just defines it. Poisonous residue from smoke is obvious to the braindead really.
squeegee !first/o5zA replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#408,099
@previous (A)
the greeks or whoever defined the humors of the body, which was wrong. just defining something based of your own best guess about what's "obvious" isn't how you science. you don't assert your own untested hypothesis as fact until some kind evidence derived from experimentation confirms your conclusion.
Anonymous D replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#408,115
@408,098 (A)
You're essentailly claiming faith in a hypothisis in the absense of proof is representive of intelligence. It is not.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 19 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^][v]#408,375
But have you heard about fourth-hand smoke? It's the real killer. Be afraid.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 day later, 4 days after the original post[^][v]#408,571
What we really need to be looking out for here is killer lettuce: lettuce smoke is deadly and can cause serious health issues in smokers and those close to them.
Dead !Pool..v42s joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^][v]#408,577