Meta !PARAdoxiHw replied with this 13 years ago, 6 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^][v]#393,986
@393,980 (A)
Okay, imagining that somehow the transwoman has ovaries producing eggs, then both the sperm and egg would have her genetics. It would not result in a clone since each sperm and egg has a random half of a person's genes but it would be very similar genetically.
(Edited 28 seconds later.)
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^][v]#393,988
@previous (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
It would be a clone because there's nothing to randomize.
Meta !PARAdoxiHw replied with this 13 years ago, 5 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^][v]#393,990
@previous (E)
Not necessarily. Some genes are dominant and recessive, and some people carry both forms. So if a person got two copies of a recessive gene, or two of a dominant gene, it would cause them to be different.
Anonymous D replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 30 minutes after the original post[^][v]#393,991
It may be possible for trans women to receive uteruses in the future. Some concerns regarding genetics, anatomy and hormones addressed below:
Women with Swyer syndrome have male genetics and lack ovaries, but have a uterus. Similarly to trans women, they need hormone replacement therapy to induce female puberty and maintain female secondary sex characteristics. Such women have had successful pregnancies, though obviously requiring egg donation and IVF.
In the case of most trans women who began HRT past male puberty, the pelvis has failed to develop femininely and broaden as it would have before or during puberty. However, as proven by Nadya Suleman (octuplets), Lina Medina (youngest mother) and Stacey Herald (smallest mother at 71 cm , a small pelvis is not an obstacle to gestation, even in extreme cases. Delivery would be via c-section.
Lucius joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 45 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#394,011
Do you get off on this weird stuff op?
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Syntax replied with this 13 years ago, 41 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#394,039
@previous (Lucius)
Not at all. HowSomEver I do get off on Science anything. I was shocked that they were doing animal transplants prior to 1900.
Now if you are looking for a more normal place to play may I suggest