squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later[^][v]#390,934
...sexy...? right?
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#390,937
'Tis neat.
I didn't need facebook though so i got rid of it.
Falco !a7Q.SWNEJw (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 9 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^][v]#391,084
@390,934 (squeegee !first/o5zA)
"cute" would probably be a more appropriate term. And "cute" being used in the context of a "cute" female and not a "cute" animal.