Minichan

Topic: superbowl in a nutshell

HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q started this discussion 13 years ago #25,396

BROUGHT DOWN AT THE 23 YARD LINE. THERE WILL BE A MEASUREMENT. BACK IN A MOMENT . . .

BUY BUY BUY

A FIRST DOWN BY INCHES, THEY LINE UP AGAIN BACK IN A MOMENT . . .

BUY BUY BUY

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 25 seconds later[^] [v] #387,486

Wow, I never thought of it that way.

squeegee !first/o5zA joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 28 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #387,489

ITT: walter find something else to complain about. shocking.

Meta !PARAdoxiHw joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #387,803

How I see it:
> Big muscular black man reaches behind another man's ass to grab a football
> 10 seconds of action
> 90 seconds of slow motion replay of said ass-grabbing
> 10 minutes of BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH commentary
> cut to cheerleaders
> cut to players standing around doing nothing
> cut to fans in the stadium drinking $10 plastic cups of Bud Lite
> more commentary
> commercial break
repeat about 90 times.
The 2004 Janet Jackson nipple slip was literally the most exciting thing to happen in the history of the Super Bowl.

If they made porn like football, there would be about five seconds of sex action then it would cut to the man and woman putting their clothes back on and discussing dialectical materialism for the next 20 minutes.

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Catherine !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #387,827

Except this year had a power outage that literally cost New Orleans the shot at ever hosting the SuperBowl.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #387,852

@387,803 (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
> If they made porn like football, there would be about five seconds of sex action then it would cut to the man and woman putting their clothes back on and discussing dialectical materialism for the next 20 minutes.
I'd watch it.

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #387,864

@previous (F)
No you would not, unless you're some huge fanboy of Hegel or Marx.

Anonymous F replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #387,866

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
I fucking love Marx!!

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #387,893

@previous (F)
Reading an excerpt of the Communist Manifesto does not mean you love Marx.

Anonymous F replied with this 13 years ago, 43 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #387,900

@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
What about if I read a summary of an entire chapter? Does this count?

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #387,905

@387,864 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
stop trying to ruin our fun you square

HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 13 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #388,004

@387,803 (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
This.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.