Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 2 minutes later[^][v]#386,720
Yes. That would be hilarious.
Ashe joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 15 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#386,721
> no poll
TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 44 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#386,725
No.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#386,726
Yes.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#386,727
In some instance they do. Old dears are known to leave small fortunes to their pets in their wills.
Meta !PARAdoxiHw joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#386,729
No but I think they should be able to own slaves.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 13 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#386,730
@previous (Meta !PARAdoxiHw)
Many cats are under the impression this is already the case.
TTEH !JXsxEkDBLs replied with this 13 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#386,739
@386,727 (F)
They usually set up a trust with instructions to spend the money on the pet's care, or make it a provision of their will. The animals don't actually have ownership of anything.