Topic: I think I may have found 'the one'
★henn★ started this discussion 14 years ago #24,588
What do you guys think?| Poll option | Votes | Percentage | Graph |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 3 | 25% | |
| No | 9 | 75% |
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #379,504
I don't know. Pull her out of the matrix and teach her some kung-fu moves. We'll be able to make a better determination then.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #379,505
So that's becky, huh? i always thought she was a blonde.
★henn★ (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 15 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #379,507
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 18 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #379,509
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #379,511
Anonymous E double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #379,512
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 39 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #379,513
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #379,514
@previous (D)
lol It's just cute that when men pretend to be discerning, when in reality they would stick their dicks in a greased up knot hole, if they were horny enough.
lol It's just cute that when men pretend to be discerning, when in reality they would stick their dicks in a greased up knot hole, if they were horny enough.
Anonymous E double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #379,515
Op, you don't deserve pleasure. I hope this woman turns you down, giggling like a school girl the whole time.
henn joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #379,516
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #379,520
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #379,523
@379,514 (E)hey, men are allowed to have taste. Just because someone might eat at McDonalds a few times doesn't mean you can't be a food critic. in fact all it does is help refine your pallet.
have you even tried oriental? it's amazing, and so is the food.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc double-posted this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #379,524
oriental is not my favorite though.mexican is great, too, but except for possibly the chance for a cross-breed,
white women are where it's at.
edit: oh! and mexican is my favorite food. next to Thai food.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
henn replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #379,525
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #379,531
@379,523 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
Is not called having taste when you claim to find someone unattractive online, but irl would put your penis in a sasquatch. That's called hypocrisy.
Is not called having taste when you claim to find someone unattractive online, but irl would put your penis in a sasquatch. That's called hypocrisy.
Anonymous E double-posted this 14 years ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #379,532
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #379,533
@379,531 (E)no it's not, i can say that caviar tastes like garbage, and then go eat McDonalds, but then also be a chef.
because it's an opinion. just because you eat at McDonalds once you can still have an opinion on fine cuisine.
and it doesn't mean that you have to then to, from now on, only ever eat at McDonalds.
that's obsured!
There's a lovely japanese place right down the road that'll leave you with a smile you won't forget. 8/10
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,534
@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
But you cant say that Mcdonald's tastes like garbage and that you would never partake, and then eat at Mcdonald's. You'd still be a hypocrite.
But you cant say that Mcdonald's tastes like garbage and that you would never partake, and then eat at Mcdonald's. You'd still be a hypocrite.
(Edited 17 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,535
henn replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,538
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,539
henn replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,540
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,541
@379,534 (E)
but McDonalds is garbage, but it's quick and i'm in a hurry. i'll just slurp it down with a big coke and go on about my merry way, slightly nauseated and bloated. probably drunk.
i forgot that drunk plays a big part of it.
but McDonalds is garbage, but it's quick and i'm in a hurry. i'll just slurp it down with a big coke and go on about my merry way, slightly nauseated and bloated. probably drunk.
i forgot that drunk plays a big part of it.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,542
@379,540 (henn)
Being a callous, and conceited asshole, who tries for/judges women who are way higher on the social ladder.
Being a callous, and conceited asshole, who tries for/judges women who are way higher on the social ladder.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,544
@previous (E)
> judges women who are way higher on the social ladder.
he was judging her looks. are you implying that looks have something to do with social status?
are you saying beautiful people are better people?
that's pretty narrow minded if you ask me.
> judges women who are way higher on the social ladder.
he was judging her looks. are you implying that looks have something to do with social status?
are you saying beautiful people are better people?
that's pretty narrow minded if you ask me.
henn replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,545
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 31 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,546
@379,544 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
Looks are directly related to social status. Trying to claim otherwise in incredibly dishonest.
Looks are directly related to social status. Trying to claim otherwise in incredibly dishonest.
henn replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,548
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,549
Anonymous E double-posted this 14 years ago, 39 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,550
RandPaul2016 !4EB6xd.Oos joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 12 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,552
You should marry a black woman.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,553
henn replied with this 14 years ago, 9 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,554
henn double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,555
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,556
@379,554 (henn)
Yes it does. Attraction often outweighs love. Wherever the other douche bags reside.
Yes it does. Attraction often outweighs love. Wherever the other douche bags reside.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E double-posted this 14 years ago, 33 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,557
You are Caucasian. That is all.
(Edited 49 seconds later.)
henn replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,558
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,560
@previous (henn)
Why would I, or why would anyone? What are you even trying to argue? You've already said that this woman is too unattractive for you to fuck. Where else can you go from there?
Why would I, or why would anyone? What are you even trying to argue? You've already said that this woman is too unattractive for you to fuck. Where else can you go from there?
henn replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,561
@previous (E)> Why would I, or why would anyone? What are you even trying to argue? You've already said that this woman is too unattractive for you to fuck. Where else can you go from there?
Because you stated @379,556 (E) "Attraction often outweighs love."
I think the woman I posted is very attractive. I was going along with the meme associated with this picture. lrn2internet
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,563
RandPaul2016 !4EB6xd.Oos replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,628
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,635
@379,550 (E)lol. you can't have it both ways, and plenty of attractive people have a lower status than Tiny fucking Tim.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc double-posted this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #379,637
anyway isn't the girl in the OP Luna Lovegood?