Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.
Mindwurms !!4IKKtS9GG joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 12 seconds later, 20 minutes after the original post[^][v]#45,152
He'd lose.
AC !tyLmN8C16E joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^][v]#45,158
The entire userbase would be legally required to compensate him for using the highly illegal, unauthorized clones. There would even be a UN convention to review this serious issue.
dreamworks4mayor '11 !xPoNIEsltA replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^][v]#45,171
Leo Vegas !gNoGoD5HzQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^][v]#45,175
It would be a great thing. He would probably won and we would all have to apologize for being psychotic fucktard trolls. Also I would go to the hearings and hit on Gunlog the whole time.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 38 seconds later, 38 minutes after the original post[^][v]#45,176
We'd have to compensate him $100,000 a nanosecond.
Nexus !jNexusRe/. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^][v]#45,181
He would have to file in either a UK court, or a US court, which would be pretty difficult to do because he has no money, no lawyer, etc.
A good lawyer can poke holes in any argument.
Depressionmanâ„¢ !!fNJHcIUn0 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,249
He would probably have one hell of a case.
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,255
Depressionmanâ„¢ !!fNJHcIUn0 replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,257
@previous (O)
Shit, dozens of people have been openly stalking, harassing, and threatening him for years. Hell yes. He would win without a doubt. The trouble would be to file an international lawsuit.
Anonymous O replied with this 15 years ago, 42 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,258
@previous (Depressionmanâ„¢ !!fNJHcIUn0)
He's only harassing himself, and nobody really stalked him.
Depressionmanâ„¢ !!fNJHcIUn0 replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,262
@previous (O)
Yes, people have gone to his apartment in masks and sprayed PEDO on his wall. That is definitely threatening, stalking, and harassment. He has an airtight case, in my opinion.
Anonymous O replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,267
@previous (Depressionmanâ„¢ !!fNJHcIUn0)
Apart from the "PEDO" graffiti, nothing's really been done to him. Kimmo's done quite more to everybody else compared to what's been done to him.
Depressionmanâ„¢ !!fNJHcIUn0 replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,276
@previous (O)
that is irrelevant in a lawsuit. You cannot bring in other issues and faults. He would sue specifically for stalking and harassment, and all he would have to prove is that he was stalked and harassed. If the defense for MC and TC tried to argue that he deserved it, the judge would say you could not bring that in, because it is irrelevant to the specific chargs.
Broseph !!fxnDb+Ve4 joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,287
@previous (Depressionmanâ„¢ !!fNJHcIUn0)
Yes, but you could bring all the harassment that he brought to us to the table. It would basically cancel out. The judge would say that we're all a bunch of stupid internet drama queens, give everyone a slap on the wrist and say that all parties need to just knock it the fuck off.
Plus, if Kimmo were to try to bring harassment charges to MC he would fail, because no one individual is behind the harassment. TC is another story since it's clear that they encourage it. With Kimmo on the other hand, it's clear that he's the one behind all the false abuse reports and other things that can be brought directly against him.
Also, I doubt he'd sue for stalking/harassment, he'd sue for copyright infringement, demanding that all illegal clones be shut down and their URLs be directed to his website.
Anonymous O replied with this 15 years ago, 33 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,289
@45,276 (Depressionmanâ„¢ !!fNJHcIUn0)
No, I mean that Kimmo has a victim complex and that most of the shit that he says that happened, never happened.
What is this, some kind of new pro-Kimmo shtick?
Anonymous F replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,294
@previous (O) > obsessed with Gunlog
Two. > claims he's always being stalked and harassed
Two. > sticking up for Gunlog's son who is supposedly always being stalked and harassed
Sum: Four.
Depressionmanâ„¢ !!fNJHcIUn0 replied with this 15 years ago, 43 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,296
@45,289 (O)
Please stop with the "shtick" talk. We are over that. Yes, people have been stalking, harassing, and threatening Kimmo. It is my opinion that he has an airtight case. You may disagree, and that is fine.
Anonymous O replied with this 15 years ago, 32 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,297
@previous (Depressionmanâ„¢ !!fNJHcIUn0)
You seem upset over the word "shtick".
sim !PznzndQYds joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,450
We can not be sued directly by anyone. They would have to sue PRQ, who doesn't care about feeble threats. And if he files a real lawsuit against us, he'd still have to go to court against PRQ. Not us. These are one of perks of being a PRQ customer.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 13 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,452
@previous (sim !PznzndQYds)
They are the awesome, but people didn't realise that until recently. :]
Tekamine !AnRbswGQv. joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 26 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,454
He would have no case. International laws. No one would actually take the case...etc etc etc
sim !PznzndQYds replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,460
@previous (Tekamine !AnRbswGQv.)
Exactly, he would be wasting his money trying to sue PRQ to take us down. PRQ already told him they're not taking any sites down (without a court order). As long as we're on PRQ no amount of complaints will do anything.
Tekamine !AnRbswGQv. replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,464
@previous (sim !PznzndQYds)
He wouldn't be even able to prove it was copyright theft seeing as he doesn't share his source code.
sim !PznzndQYds replied with this 15 years ago, 59 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,465
@previous (Tekamine !AnRbswGQv.)
Yeah, also things looking similar/the same doesn't mean it infringes on anything. He doesn't have a patent on the layout.
Tekamine !AnRbswGQv. replied with this 15 years ago, 38 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,466
@previous (sim !PznzndQYds)
Pretty much. I think we've just summed up how redundant his claims are.
Leonidas !nBpim1wazU replied with this 15 years ago, 30 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#45,479