Minichan

Topic: George Will: 'Quite Literally, The Opposition to Gay Marriage Is Dying'

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) !0VegJ9Jl.Q started this discussion 14 years ago #24,017

http://news.yahoo.com/george-quite-literally-opposition-gay-marriage-dying-165555672--abc-news-topstories.html

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 34 minutes later[^] [v] #373,328

Link's not working. Huh.

But yes, this is good news.

(Edited 51 seconds later.)

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) !0VegJ9Jl.Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #373,331

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/12/george-will-quite-literally-the-opposition-to-gay-marriage-is-dying/

derpy !hoovesEJmo joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #373,377

Yay.Freedom to marry who you want!

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #373,380

I literally dont understand the whole "gay marriage" thing. Can someone please explain it to me?

doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #373,383

@previous (D)
same sex people getting married

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #373,384

@373,380 (D)
A bunch of religious nutjobs in the United States want to prevent gays from getting married because Leviticus says it's an abomination, because they think marriage is a sacrament to which Christianity owns the exclusive rights, and because they're homophobes, but it's OK because only old farts actually believe this shit, and they're all dying off. So as soon as all these assholes fucking die, gays will get married, weed will be legal, and we can finally teach evolution and other sciences in schools without these dumbasses bitching about their kids being taught things that their parents don't understand.

(Edited 42 seconds later.)

Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #373,471

@373,383 (doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ)
@previous (F)
What is marriage though? Like how would you define it?

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #373,473

@OP
You are, quite literally, worse than Hitler.

doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #373,494

@373,471 (D)
Marriage (also called matrimony or wedlock) is a social union or legal contract between people called spouses that establishes rights and obligations between the spouses, between the spouses and their children, and between the spouses and their in-laws.[1] The definition of marriage varies according to different cultures, but it is usually an institution in which interpersonal relationships, usually intimate and sexual, are acknowledged. When defined broadly, marriage is considered a cultural universal. In many cultures, marriage is formalized via a wedding ceremony. In terms of legal recognition, most sovereign states and other jurisdictions limit marriage to opposite sex couples or two persons of opposite gender in the gender binary, and some of these allow polygynous marriage. Since 2000, several countries and some other jurisdictions have legalized same-sex marriage. In some cultures, marriage is recommended or compulsory before pursuing any sexual activity.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 11 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #373,603

@previous (doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ)
> a social union or legal contract
well that's two completely different things

doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #373,606

@previous (H)
implying it just says legal contract
what the hell is your point anyway mm

Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #373,623

@previous (doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ)
is it a social union or a legal contract?

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #373,626

@previous (H)
false di-

...never mind.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #373,627

@previous (I)
I'll do it!

@373,623 (H)
False dichotomy. You are decadent.

Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #373,643

@373,626 (I)
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Please, expound your argument.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #373,646

lolmountainmanlol

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #373,718

@373,643 (H)
Compelling argument, mate. Struth.

doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ replied with this 14 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #373,750

@373,623 (H)
i already posted the definition of marriage

Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 25 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #373,753

@previous (doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ)
You gave two definitions.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #373,754

@previous (H)
Crikey mate, you're about as clever as a dingo.

ashe joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 35 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #373,756

@373,384 (F)

> it's OK because only old farts actually believe this shit

I always think this and then I get really surprised and saddened when i meet someone who is young and believes it

doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #373,795

@373,753 (H)
they are both correct

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #373,806

@373,756 (ashe)
well you cant expect every child that grew up in a conservative house to have broken free of the bullshit by the time you meet them

Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #373,823

@373,756 (ashe)
Brainwashed fundies. They're a small minority and they're a minority that's going to shrink as they get older.

Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #373,839

@373,795 (doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ)
So marriage is actually two separate and distinct things?

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #373,840

@previous (H)
What part of false dichotomy do you not understand you fucking moron?

Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 19 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #373,844

@previous (M)
Expound your argument. Thanks.

Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #373,876

ITT: MM utterly fails to acknowledge, answer or even comprehend criticism

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #373,878

@373,844 (H)
Have you fired up the barbie today, mate? You'd be better off doin' that then lookin' like a wanker on here.

Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 5 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #373,908

@373,876 (I)
Expound your argument. Thanks.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #373,914

@previous (H)
Struth, mate. You're making a dingo of yourself.

Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #373,921

@373,844 (H)
What makes you think that marriage is not/cannot be a social union and/or legal contract. Those two things are not mutually exclusive and they actually do define the institution of marriage quite well.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 41 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #373,927

@previous (M)
Because he is mountainman. Disagreeing with things is his schtick. Even if he had to argue that black is white, he'll do it if it means disagreeing with somebody.

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #373,930

@373,921 (M)
Because religion poisons people. Look what fairy tales can do to an already damaged person.

Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #374,007

@373,921 (M)
If a marriage was only one of those things, would it still be a marriage?

Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #374,049

@373,930 (N)
That doesn't answer my question. What does your not liking religion have to do with social unions and legal contracts not being two mutually exclusive things?

Anonymous M double-posted this 14 years ago, 23 seconds later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #374,050

@374,007 (H)
In some cultures, yes.

Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #374,053

@previous (M)
Do you believes that the USA is a multicultural Union?
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.