Topic: A man is a rape-supporter if…
Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #23,389
He has ever sexually engaged with any woman while she was underage, drunk, high, physically restrained, unconscious, or subjected to psychological, physical, economic, or emotional coercion.
He defends the current legal definition of rape and/or opposes making consent a defense.
He has accused a rape victim of having “buyer’s remorse†or wanting to get money from the man.
He has blamed a woman for “putting herself in a situation†where she “could be†attacked.
He has procured a prostitute.
He characterizes prostitution as a “legitimate†“job†“choice†or defends men who purchase prostitutes.
He has ever revealed he conceives of sex as fundamentally transactional.
He has gone to a strip club.
He is anti-abortion.
He is pro-â€choice†because he believes abortion access will make women more sexually available.
He frames discussions of pornography in terms of “freedom of speech.â€
He watches pornography in which women are depicted.
He watches any pornography in which sexual acts are depicted as a struggle for power or domination, regardless of whether women are present.
He characterizes the self-sexualizing behavior of some women, such as wearing make-up or high heels, as evidence of women’s desire to “get†a man.
He tells or laughs at jokes involving women being attacked, sexually “hoodwinked,†or sexually harassed.
He expresses enjoyment of movies/musicals/TV shows/plays in which women are sexually demeaned or presented as sexual objects
He mocks women who complain about sexual attacks, sexual harassment, street cat-calls, media depictions of women, or other forms of sexual objectification.
He supports sexual “liberation†and claims women would have more sex with (more) men if society did not “inhibit†them.
He states or implies that women who do not want to have sex with men are “inhibited,†“prudes,†“stuck-up,†“man-haters,†or psychologically ill.
He argues that certain male behaviors towards women are “cultural†and therefore not legitimate subjects of feminist attention.
He ever subordinates the interests of women in a given population to the interests of the men in that population, or proceeds in discussions as if the interests of the women are the same as the interests of the men.
He promotes religious or philosophical views in which a woman’s physical/psychological/emotional/sexual well-being is subordinated to a man’s.
He describes female anatomy in terms of penetration, or uses terms referencing the supposed “emptiness†of female anatomy when describing women.
He defends the physical abuse of women on the grounds of “consent.â€
He defends the sexualization or sexual abuse of minor females on the grounds of “consent†or “willingness.â€
He promotes the idea that women as a class are happier or more fulfilled if they have children, or that they “should†have children.
He argues that people (or just “menâ€) have sexual “needs.â€
He discusses the “types†of women he finds sexually appealing and/or attempts to demean women by telling them he does not find them sexually appealing.
He sexually objectifies lesbians or lesbian sexual activity.
He defends these actions by saying that some women also engage in them.
So, let’s see how many women reading this know at least one male over the age of 18 who does not fit this list. Anybody?
He defends the current legal definition of rape and/or opposes making consent a defense.
He has accused a rape victim of having “buyer’s remorse†or wanting to get money from the man.
He has blamed a woman for “putting herself in a situation†where she “could be†attacked.
He has procured a prostitute.
He characterizes prostitution as a “legitimate†“job†“choice†or defends men who purchase prostitutes.
He has ever revealed he conceives of sex as fundamentally transactional.
He has gone to a strip club.
He is anti-abortion.
He is pro-â€choice†because he believes abortion access will make women more sexually available.
He frames discussions of pornography in terms of “freedom of speech.â€
He watches pornography in which women are depicted.
He watches any pornography in which sexual acts are depicted as a struggle for power or domination, regardless of whether women are present.
He characterizes the self-sexualizing behavior of some women, such as wearing make-up or high heels, as evidence of women’s desire to “get†a man.
He tells or laughs at jokes involving women being attacked, sexually “hoodwinked,†or sexually harassed.
He expresses enjoyment of movies/musicals/TV shows/plays in which women are sexually demeaned or presented as sexual objects
He mocks women who complain about sexual attacks, sexual harassment, street cat-calls, media depictions of women, or other forms of sexual objectification.
He supports sexual “liberation†and claims women would have more sex with (more) men if society did not “inhibit†them.
He states or implies that women who do not want to have sex with men are “inhibited,†“prudes,†“stuck-up,†“man-haters,†or psychologically ill.
He argues that certain male behaviors towards women are “cultural†and therefore not legitimate subjects of feminist attention.
He ever subordinates the interests of women in a given population to the interests of the men in that population, or proceeds in discussions as if the interests of the women are the same as the interests of the men.
He promotes religious or philosophical views in which a woman’s physical/psychological/emotional/sexual well-being is subordinated to a man’s.
He describes female anatomy in terms of penetration, or uses terms referencing the supposed “emptiness†of female anatomy when describing women.
He defends the physical abuse of women on the grounds of “consent.â€
He defends the sexualization or sexual abuse of minor females on the grounds of “consent†or “willingness.â€
He promotes the idea that women as a class are happier or more fulfilled if they have children, or that they “should†have children.
He argues that people (or just “menâ€) have sexual “needs.â€
He discusses the “types†of women he finds sexually appealing and/or attempts to demean women by telling them he does not find them sexually appealing.
He sexually objectifies lesbians or lesbian sexual activity.
He defends these actions by saying that some women also engage in them.
So, let’s see how many women reading this know at least one male over the age of 18 who does not fit this list. Anybody?
Todd Akins joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 35 minutes later[^] [v] #365,619
I endorse your message. What exactly is your message?Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #365,621
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #365,687
A man is a rape supporter if he tries and pretends that rape isnt a big deal. Also, if he uses rape threats (even online) to try and silence people.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #365,692
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #365,696
@previous (E)
They make these threads to try and say that because everything is rape, nothing is rape. Its sad.
They make these threads to try and say that because everything is rape, nothing is rape. Its sad.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #365,698
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #365,701
Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 33 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #365,717
Rape is merely god's will. Who are you to oppose HIS divine will?
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 30 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #365,718
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 23 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #365,725
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #365,732
prostitution isn't rape
pornography isn't rape
i'm not a rape supporter for thinking either these
pornography isn't rape
i'm not a rape supporter for thinking either these
Jeshua of Nazareth joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 54 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #365,747
I am proud to be a rape supporter.
Syntax replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #365,766
@365,717 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
Considering how dumb fucks who said such got cornholed by pubic last Tuesday, and Fox TV is major butthurt about having such fools in their Tea Party.
Considering how dumb fucks who said such got cornholed by pubic last Tuesday, and Fox TV is major butthurt about having such fools in their Tea Party.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 22 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #366,002
Notice how not one of these is either "Rapes people", or "says that raping people is A okay".
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #366,015
@previous (L)
Well, the list would be a lot shorter and less inclusive if that was the case. But if you cater to logic then you cannot rationalize your fantasy of aborting your teenage son when he looks at porn, and then the patriarchs have won!
Well, the list would be a lot shorter and less inclusive if that was the case. But if you cater to logic then you cannot rationalize your fantasy of aborting your teenage son when he looks at porn, and then the patriarchs have won!
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 53 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #366,016
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #366,017
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #366,018
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #366,019
@previous (N)
Quantitative measurement is a tool of the patriarchy which should be disregarded in favor of more intangible standards.
Quantitative measurement is a tool of the patriarchy which should be disregarded in favor of more intangible standards.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 37 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #366,025
ashe joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #366,081
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #366,096
Antikhristos !M6R0eWkIpk joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #366,103
Reported for misandria.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #366,109
Quote:
He describes female anatomy in terms of penetration, or uses terms referencing the supposed “emptiness†of female anatomy when describing women.
What does this mean exactly?
He describes female anatomy in terms of penetration, or uses terms referencing the supposed “emptiness†of female anatomy when describing women.
What does this mean exactly?
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 14 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #366,257
@previous (D)
Referring to the vagina as a hole, or the uterus as empty/non-pregnant.
Referring to the vagina as a hole, or the uterus as empty/non-pregnant.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #366,259
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #366,285
tl:dr OP.
Basically, what you meant to say was: a man is a rape supporter if he's ever had sex with a woman who later regretted it, and he refused to accept jail time as a penance.
Basically, what you meant to say was: a man is a rape supporter if he's ever had sex with a woman who later regretted it, and he refused to accept jail time as a penance.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #366,287
Anonymous R replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #366,291
@previous (D)
No. They lie about it a lot. And for the same reason women do. To be compensated for something they came to regret later.
Case in point: Elmo is Innocent!
No. They lie about it a lot. And for the same reason women do. To be compensated for something they came to regret later.
Case in point: Elmo is Innocent!