Topic: Cosplay Deviants is so ridiculously bad it's almost funny.

Anonymous A started this discussion 15 years ago #2,335

At least it would be if it weren't mind-numbingly pathetic. Most of the photos are just of people wearing wigs or improvised clothing. I can't believe people actually pay money to see a bunch of amateur photographers screwing up relatively simple cosplays (considering they actually LACK the full costumes). The rates for membership are $9.95 USD for 30 days and $24.95 USD for 90 days. I don't really have anything against weeaboos, but this is just out of control.

I'll post a few examples of what I'm talking about.

I don't know who this character is but whatever it is, it's pretty much a boner killer.

(Edited 7 minutes later.)

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #43,026

Anonymous A (OP) triple-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,028

Apparently removing even more accessories warrants being marketed as new cosplay.

Anonymous A (OP) quadruple-posted this 15 years ago, 43 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,031

Who the fuck is this even supposed to be? The Old Spice shower commercial guy? why.jpg

Anonymous A (OP) quintuple-posted this 15 years ago, 56 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,034

I also find it very unsettling that they allow these mock-ups of characters who are supposed to be children. Isn't this Pokemon girl supposed to be like 10 years old? Gross.

Anonymous A (OP) sextuple-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,035

Admittedly, I laughed really hard when I saw this. Good Lord.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,037

@43,034 (A)
before 4kids got their hands on it she was 16-17

(Edited 48 seconds later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,042

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)

I don't know or care, Eels.

Lawrence !9p5vCatBBQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,045

@43,035 (A)
Oh god. That's fucking awful.
@43,028 (A)
lol. wat...

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 7 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,050

@43,034 (A)
There are so many different instances of women being sexually infantilsized in modern media.

http://filipspagnoli.wordpress.com/2010/10/22/infantilization-a-collection-of-images/

http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/05/15/covergirl-lipstick-ad-infantilizes-women-but-also-sexualizes-them/

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 30 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,051

@previous (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)

I'm well aware. It doesn't make it any less unsettling.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 15 years ago, 54 seconds later, 31 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,053

@previous (A)
It is very strange.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 33 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,054

@43,051 (A)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 4 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,057

@43,053 (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)

Indeed, but I'm talking about this cosplay website. That's just one facet of the place.

On a different note, this is one of their model's live events. It basically just looks like something you'd see at a gentleman's club.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 2 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,058

It's strange. From most of what I've seen it's just teasing photos like this. They just never seem to go anywhere and it gets boring fast.

Falco !PZmcClOUDk joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,062

lol

wow.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,064

@43,057 (A)
Lol @ the guy with the long hair.

Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 58 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,069

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #43,073

@43,058 (A)
Some graphic sexual activity would definitely improve this site.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic double-posted this 15 years ago, 16 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #43,074

@43,069 (Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw)
She looks great.

Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #43,077

@previous (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)
> Great

> â€“adjective
> 1.
> unusually or comparatively large in size or dimensions

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #43,083

@previous (Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw)
Who cares if she's fat? She still did a really good job on that costume.

Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #43,084

@previous (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 15 years ago, 21 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #43,085

@previous (Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw)
What?

Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw replied with this 15 years ago, 49 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #43,088

@previous (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 15 years ago, 48 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #43,091

@previous (Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw)
You suck at this.

Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw replied with this 15 years ago, 40 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #43,092

@previous (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 15 years ago, 45 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #43,093

@43,026 (A)
This one would have been better if they had used Japanese women as the models.

Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw replied with this 15 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #43,095

@previous (totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic)

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 27 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #43,148

what is this i don't even.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #43,153

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
It's horribly drawn, but it's this character:

æ‚Ÿ

RedFox !rFox/iQSaQ joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 29 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,183

@43,148 (A)
oh my
lololol

Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,187

@43,034 (A)

> Isn't this Pokemon girl supposed to be like 10 years old? Gross.

What's gross? The fact that the model isn't really 10 years old?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,191

@previous (I)

Nope. The fact that the model is trying to represent a 10 year old.

Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 9 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,194

@previous (A)
So you don't like how an older woman is used in place of a 10 year old?

You sick fuck.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 18 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,208

@previous (I)

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 hours later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,489

@43,069 (Nickalollyoff !Aw0s40dyqw)

Nick, hun, you're doing nothing but proving how immature and immersed you are with doing the same thing over and over. What are you trying to prove? Gil and Saint don't even react negatively to your shit posting of those pics.

http://bunker.minichan.org/topic/2335#reply_43069
http://bunker.minichan.org/topic/2336#reply_43068
http://bunker.minichan.org/topic/2336#reply_43071
http://bunker.minichan.org/topic/1905#reply_35217
http://bunker.minichan.org/topic/2141#reply_39294

Seriously, it's shit posting.

You obsessed much? :)

Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,493

...very few people can actually do that right.

sim !PznzndQYds joined in and replied with this 15 years ago, 48 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,494

@previous (Nega !34Kas0OdzM)
Can you?

sim !PznzndQYds double-posted this 15 years ago, 1 minute later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,498

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Nobody cares Eels.

Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 15 years ago, 50 seconds later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,499

@43,494 (sim !PznzndQYds)
I might be able to pull of a passable Prince of Persia in a year or so.
Why?

sim !PznzndQYds replied with this 15 years ago, 3 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,503

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Because nobody cares about Asian characters? You make little sense.

sim !PznzndQYds double-posted this 15 years ago, 6 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,509

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Minichan isn't dying. The stats shows a growing trend in the past 6 months. So yeah, enjoy your evening.

sim !PznzndQYds triple-posted this 15 years ago, 5 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,513

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
Where was I serious? I just don't have the strength to pointlessly argue with a drunken Eel.

sim !PznzndQYds quadruple-posted this 15 years ago, 10 minutes later, 8 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,518

@previous (sim !PznzndQYds)
> Implying so hard.

Anonymous I replied with this 15 years ago, 4 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,594

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)
You stared at a man's cock for hours while trying to figure out what Chinese character is on the back of his shirt?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,608

Thanks for mangling my thread, assholes. I give you gold and this is what I get in return.

Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 15 years ago, 14 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,611

(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)

Yes, problem, Mr. Huxley.

totoforhire !!Phkn/3Gic replied with this 15 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #43,646

@43,489 (L)
I agree. It's mean and boring.