Topic: Mitt Romney is going to win.
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ started this discussion 14 years ago #23,190
I took a sampling, and my dad, my mom, my girlfriend, and her dad, and mom all support Romney. Therefore 100 percent sampled are voting for Romney, therefore Romney will win by a 100 percent margin.
Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #362,918
Why not spend this time actually learning about politics if you're interested?Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 37 seconds later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,920
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 37 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,921
arg as fuck
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 9 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,922
> has absolutely no idea how statistics or polling works
> thinks he knows how to poll better than professional pollsters and statisticians
shut the fuck up cutie pie.
> thinks he knows how to poll better than professional pollsters and statisticians
shut the fuck up cutie pie.
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,928
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,929
@362,920 (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Yes, in the demographic of your house Romney will win by a 100 percent margin.
It's clear you're a little embarrassed about your ignorance. We are all ignorant about something, but few of us have the arrogance to think we are not. Just drop it and go learn something. Thanks.
Yes, in the demographic of your house Romney will win by a 100 percent margin.
It's clear you're a little embarrassed about your ignorance. We are all ignorant about something, but few of us have the arrogance to think we are not. Just drop it and go learn something. Thanks.
Syntax joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,931
@OP
> I took a sampling, and my dad, my mom, my girlfriend, and her dad, and mom all support Romney. Therefore 100 percent sampled are voting for Romney, therefore Romney will win by a 100 percent margin.
Well now - Do any of them have some spare cash they want to put up? I mean if they really think that they might want to make some money from me? By how much do they think he will win?
> I took a sampling, and my dad, my mom, my girlfriend, and her dad, and mom all support Romney. Therefore 100 percent sampled are voting for Romney, therefore Romney will win by a 100 percent margin.
Well now - Do any of them have some spare cash they want to put up? I mean if they really think that they might want to make some money from me? By how much do they think he will win?
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 17 seconds later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,932
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,936
@362,928 (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Look up nate silver's 2008 predictions. Compare them to your own. Whose was better and by how much?
Look up nate silver's 2008 predictions. Compare them to your own. Whose was better and by how much?
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 14 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,940
You'd do better to call 3500 random phone numbers.
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,941
I think it's pretty clear that this wasn't a serious topic.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 29 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,942
Ks, you make it so easy.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 12 seconds later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,943
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,944
@previous (D)
Okay. I'm sorry you don't understand when something is facetious. Don't get mad at me because you don't understand subtext, or social cues.
Okay. I'm sorry you don't understand when something is facetious. Don't get mad at me because you don't understand subtext, or social cues.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,947
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 26 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,948
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 27 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,949
@previous (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
every post you make is dumber than the last. you are not going to dig yourself out of this hole by continuing to be an idiot.
every post you make is dumber than the last. you are not going to dig yourself out of this hole by continuing to be an idiot.
doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,954
jesus christ you retards op is being sarcastic
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 59 seconds later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,955
@362,949 (D)
> every post you make is dumber than the last. you are not going to dig yourself out of this hole by continuing to be an idiot.
> every post you make is dumber than the last. you are not going to dig yourself out of this hole by continuing to be an idiot.
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,958
@362,949 (D)
> expecting any topic, or post on minichan to have any real value.
I don't see how making a joke is at all idiotic. Maybe you didn't get it, or like it. But I'm not retarded just because you don't agree with me.
> expecting any topic, or post on minichan to have any real value.
I don't see how making a joke is at all idiotic. Maybe you didn't get it, or like it. But I'm not retarded just because you don't agree with me.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,960
@362,954 (doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ)
Yes, let us laugh at these philistines! For not acknowledging his sarcasm!
Yes, let us laugh at these philistines! For not acknowledging his sarcasm!
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 12 seconds later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,961
@362,958 (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Actually you have it backwards as usual. its not that you're retarded because I don't agree with you; rather, I don't agree with you because you're retarded.
Actually you have it backwards as usual. its not that you're retarded because I don't agree with you; rather, I don't agree with you because you're retarded.
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,963
@362,958 (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
The severity of your retardation is severely worsened by the confidence with which you hold your retardation to be accurate portrayals of this world.
The severity of your retardation is severely worsened by the confidence with which you hold your retardation to be accurate portrayals of this world.
Syntax replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,964
@362,948 (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
I from getgo knew what you were trying to do. It would even be funny if it were valid.
So who/whom do you think will win?
I from getgo knew what you were trying to do. It would even be funny if it were valid.
So who/whom do you think will win?
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,966
@362,961 (D)
You're too arrogant to admit you didn't get a joke. I'm done bickering with you.
@previous (Syntax)
I honestly think Obama is going to win. People tend to like to stick to the status quo rather than try something new. But I really have no idea.
You're too arrogant to admit you didn't get a joke. I'm done bickering with you.
@previous (Syntax)
I honestly think Obama is going to win. People tend to like to stick to the status quo rather than try something new. But I really have no idea.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,967
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 49 seconds later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #362,968
Syntax replied with this 14 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #362,975
@362,966 (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
A friend of mine said this to me a couple of weeks ago. Famous line:
Better to chose the Devil you know, rather then chose the Devil you don't know.
Based on poor economy and based on fools who really think a President any President can change the economy all that much with some infamous exceptions, I think a lot of people feel that way.
I continue to buy updated Uni Text books to have for review such as Physics Chemistry Biology but admit not much time to review them - Cracking open the Statistics book was a grunge but sure has been useful so I could follow details I needed to understand.
Probability of Obama re-election -- Random Drift 97%, Bayesian Prediction 99.5% Meta-margin: Obama +2.86% = Obama: 319 Romney: 219
So with Meta analysis I feel more better re money I cannot afford to lose and I really mean that.
A friend of mine said this to me a couple of weeks ago. Famous line:
Better to chose the Devil you know, rather then chose the Devil you don't know.
Based on poor economy and based on fools who really think a President any President can change the economy all that much with some infamous exceptions, I think a lot of people feel that way.
I continue to buy updated Uni Text books to have for review such as Physics Chemistry Biology but admit not much time to review them - Cracking open the Statistics book was a grunge but sure has been useful so I could follow details I needed to understand.
Probability of Obama re-election -- Random Drift 97%, Bayesian Prediction 99.5% Meta-margin: Obama +2.86% = Obama: 319 Romney: 219
So with Meta analysis I feel more better re money I cannot afford to lose and I really mean that.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,006
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,008
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,011
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,012
Can't happen without Ohio. And Obama's up post Sandy.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,018
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 33 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,027
Anonymous J double-posted this 14 years ago, 31 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,028
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,032
Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 27 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,034
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 27 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,035
Anonymous J double-posted this 14 years ago, 16 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,036
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 14 years ago, 26 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,059
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 39 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,073
@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
As arrogant as thinking people are smart just because they agree with you?
As arrogant as thinking people are smart just because they agree with you?
Negi Springfield !ATxpNDGx1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,080
@OP
> I took a sampling, and my dad, my mom, my girlfriend, and her dad, and mom all support Romney. Therefore 100 percent sampled are voting for Romney, therefore Romney will win by a 100 percent margin.
I don't like his Mormon religion and hope he doesn't win because of that.
Go read about the United Order, the Mormon equivalent of the New World Order. Really messed up stuff.
> I took a sampling, and my dad, my mom, my girlfriend, and her dad, and mom all support Romney. Therefore 100 percent sampled are voting for Romney, therefore Romney will win by a 100 percent margin.
I don't like his Mormon religion and hope he doesn't win because of that.
Go read about the United Order, the Mormon equivalent of the New World Order. Really messed up stuff.
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,083
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,085
@previous (C)
Wasn't thinking of a specific example, it's just a thing I see people do. I'm kind of guilty of it myself.
Wasn't thinking of a specific example, it's just a thing I see people do. I'm kind of guilty of it myself.
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 43 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,094
@363,059 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
No. You are ignorant, even where you agree with me. Someone like fake anon is not ignorant, even though he disagrees with me.
No. You are ignorant, even where you agree with me. Someone like fake anon is not ignorant, even though he disagrees with me.
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 42 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,096
beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 54 seconds later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,097
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,123
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,127
@363,094 (J)
Ks seems to disagree with me a lot on this site, but I actually don't think he's retarded, or ignorant.
Ks seems to disagree with me a lot on this site, but I actually don't think he's retarded, or ignorant.
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,144
@previous (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
I think he's just upset because I have successfully challenged his ideology many times.
Recently I shut down his little fantasy of taxation being theft.
I think he's just upset because I have successfully challenged his ideology many times.
Recently I shut down his little fantasy of taxation being theft.
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 18 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,147
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 16 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,153
@363,127 (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Oh he's definitely ignorant. Retarded is a different question. Some people just have strange posting styles online. He definitely comes off as immature, and coupled with his ignorance, this does suggest retardation.
Oh he's definitely ignorant. Retarded is a different question. Some people just have strange posting styles online. He definitely comes off as immature, and coupled with his ignorance, this does suggest retardation.
Anonymous J double-posted this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,154
@363,144 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
> I think he's just upset because I have successfully challenged his ideology many times.
>
> Recently I shut down his little fantasy of taxation being theft.
OMG
OK, yeah, you are definitely retarded. Or trolling? I don't consider this a strong possibility because most people here actually agree with you, so there would be no reward for such a shtick.
> I think he's just upset because I have successfully challenged his ideology many times.
>
> Recently I shut down his little fantasy of taxation being theft.
OMG
OK, yeah, you are definitely retarded. Or trolling? I don't consider this a strong possibility because most people here actually agree with you, so there would be no reward for such a shtick.
Anonymous J triple-posted this 14 years ago, 15 seconds later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,155
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 14 years ago, 28 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,160
@363,154 (J)
Anyone can read the thread, bud.
http://www.scatchan.net/topic/18331
You were flailing all over the place with analogies trying to keep your argument afloat.
I think you're very knowledgeable, but you also seem to be very narrow-minded. You've focused on this one idea quite intensely, and anything challenging the idea is basically just written off, it's similar to debating someone about religion in many aspects.
I still respect your beliefs though; I understand they were shaped by your personal and unique experience in this world. That's cool. Subscribe to whatever ideology suits you best. At the core of political philosophies there is no right or wrong really, just different. Like I said before, we can disagree and it'll be okay.
You may consider the possibility that you're doing yourself a disservice by clinging to one ideology though. Everyone should question their beliefs from time to time.
Anyone can read the thread, bud.
http://www.scatchan.net/topic/18331
You were flailing all over the place with analogies trying to keep your argument afloat.
I think you're very knowledgeable, but you also seem to be very narrow-minded. You've focused on this one idea quite intensely, and anything challenging the idea is basically just written off, it's similar to debating someone about religion in many aspects.
I still respect your beliefs though; I understand they were shaped by your personal and unique experience in this world. That's cool. Subscribe to whatever ideology suits you best. At the core of political philosophies there is no right or wrong really, just different. Like I said before, we can disagree and it'll be okay.
You may consider the possibility that you're doing yourself a disservice by clinging to one ideology though. Everyone should question their beliefs from time to time.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,163
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,227
@363,160 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
It's not my failing that you can not understand a simple analogy. You literally tried to argue in that thread that mugging, rape, etc. are all voluntary.
lol nice psychoanalysis, bud, but you're way off. If anything my problem is an inability to just decide on something. I spend far too long considering other points of view. I have spent weeks now pondering whether I hold Roman culture or Greek culture to be the aesthetic norm for European Christendom.
I welcome all criticism, and I love hearing new ideas. I have changed from a modernist, politically conservative, fundamentalist Pentecostal to a traditionalist, anarchist (pseudo)Catholic. I have no sacred cows. But sometimes your arguments are so weak that they can be flippantly disregarded.
You are wrong that there is no right or wrong in political philosophy. Natural law exists. Murder is wrong. Theft is wrong. Things will not be okay if people disagree on this. There will be murder and theft!
It's not my failing that you can not understand a simple analogy. You literally tried to argue in that thread that mugging, rape, etc. are all voluntary.
lol nice psychoanalysis, bud, but you're way off. If anything my problem is an inability to just decide on something. I spend far too long considering other points of view. I have spent weeks now pondering whether I hold Roman culture or Greek culture to be the aesthetic norm for European Christendom.
I welcome all criticism, and I love hearing new ideas. I have changed from a modernist, politically conservative, fundamentalist Pentecostal to a traditionalist, anarchist (pseudo)Catholic. I have no sacred cows. But sometimes your arguments are so weak that they can be flippantly disregarded.
You are wrong that there is no right or wrong in political philosophy. Natural law exists. Murder is wrong. Theft is wrong. Things will not be okay if people disagree on this. There will be murder and theft!
Ashe !bbKEtchUp. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,239
@previous (J)
> anarchist catholic
Everything I remember about being catholic revolved around going to a church on a specific day at a specific time and picking up a book and following the instructions within that book to the letter. So I don't understand what an anarchist catholic is, please explain.
> anarchist catholic
Everything I remember about being catholic revolved around going to a church on a specific day at a specific time and picking up a book and following the instructions within that book to the letter. So I don't understand what an anarchist catholic is, please explain.
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,241
@previous (Ashe !bbKEtchUp.)
(pseudo)Catholic. I have become largely convinced of the truth of Catholic doctrine, but I still attend my Protestant Church. Anarchism is a political philosophy, not a social or religious one.
(pseudo)Catholic. I have become largely convinced of the truth of Catholic doctrine, but I still attend my Protestant Church. Anarchism is a political philosophy, not a social or religious one.
Ashe !bbKEtchUp. replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,242
@previous (J)
> I have become largely convinced of the truth of Catholic doctrine, but I still attend my Protestant Church
Why
> I have become largely convinced of the truth of Catholic doctrine, but I still attend my Protestant Church
Why
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 12 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,243
@363,239 (Ashe !bbKEtchUp.)
The two ideologies go together very well, actually. Catholics like to molest children and anarchists would want the laws against this removed. It's the perfect match!
When you take this into account, it's very understandable why mountainman has the view that he does.
The two ideologies go together very well, actually. Catholics like to molest children and anarchists would want the laws against this removed. It's the perfect match!
When you take this into account, it's very understandable why mountainman has the view that he does.
(Edited 4 minutes later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,257
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 26 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,260
@363,242 (Ashe !bbKEtchUp.)
because, while convinced of the truth of it, I am not necessarily convinced of the importance of it. I don't believe I am imperiled by not attending. Plus I have labored my whole life and attained success in this Protestant church, so I feel I can do more here.
because, while convinced of the truth of it, I am not necessarily convinced of the importance of it. I don't believe I am imperiled by not attending. Plus I have labored my whole life and attained success in this Protestant church, so I feel I can do more here.
Anonymous J double-posted this 14 years ago, 15 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,261
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,262
@previous (J)
Your problems are your antisocial views and behavior. Your interest in understanding why you are such a retarded piece of shit are to disprove what others think of you and not for valid introspection and improvement.
The time spent explaining to you why your views are wrong and why your behaviors are antisocial are not worth the effort. What you seek out of explanation is the opportunity to direct your anger at a target. I'm not going to play your antisocial games of ego.
You are retarded.
Your problems are your antisocial views and behavior. Your interest in understanding why you are such a retarded piece of shit are to disprove what others think of you and not for valid introspection and improvement.
The time spent explaining to you why your views are wrong and why your behaviors are antisocial are not worth the effort. What you seek out of explanation is the opportunity to direct your anger at a target. I'm not going to play your antisocial games of ego.
You are retarded.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 59 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,266
is this a hate on mountainman thread? i love these, he's so retarded and wrong all the time but he doesn't even know it.
What a maroon.
he doesn't seem to understand that most everyone disagrees with him (and by that i mean most people in the world disagree with his ideology) because his sick and twisted values are sick and twisted. Perverted even.
but he can't see it.
he thinks everyone else is a crazy idiot.
the crazy idiot.
and he's lying about not wanting to be catholic, he really wants it bad, but he can't be. They won't let him.
not in the wake of all the child molestation and rape scandals. They'd never let him be near children. trust me, these days a good catholic can smell a pedophile a mile away, sort of a cross between Rice Crispy Treats and Super Lube.
What a maroon.
he doesn't seem to understand that most everyone disagrees with him (and by that i mean most people in the world disagree with his ideology) because his sick and twisted values are sick and twisted. Perverted even.
but he can't see it.
he thinks everyone else is a crazy idiot.
the crazy idiot.
and he's lying about not wanting to be catholic, he really wants it bad, but he can't be. They won't let him.
not in the wake of all the child molestation and rape scandals. They'd never let him be near children. trust me, these days a good catholic can smell a pedophile a mile away, sort of a cross between Rice Crispy Treats and Super Lube.
(Edited 18 seconds later.)
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 23 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,272
@previous (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
> he's so retarded and wrong all the time but he doesn't even know it.
Actually he does know it because every time he tried to turn the lights off, he discovers they are already off.
> he's so retarded and wrong all the time but he doesn't even know it.
Actually he does know it because every time he tried to turn the lights off, he discovers they are already off.
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 34 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,275
@363,266 (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
> They'd never let him be near children. trust me, these days a good catholic can smell a pedophile a mile away, sort of a cross between Rice Crispy Treats and Super Lube.
damlol
> They'd never let him be near children. trust me, these days a good catholic can smell a pedophile a mile away, sort of a cross between Rice Crispy Treats and Super Lube.
damlol
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 19 minutes later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,280
I think you guys might be confusing the words "retarded", and "disagreeable".
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,287
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,290
Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,291
Anonymous R replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #363,295
@previous (Postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Yes. He blames molestation victims for their crimes, encourages a "free state" even though he doesnt understand what taxes pay for, argues that he knows more than medical doctors, and was kicked from his church for being gross. He's like a pervy Forrest Gump. Not charming Forrest from the movie, but scary Forrest from the books.
Yes. He blames molestation victims for their crimes, encourages a "free state" even though he doesnt understand what taxes pay for, argues that he knows more than medical doctors, and was kicked from his church for being gross. He's like a pervy Forrest Gump. Not charming Forrest from the movie, but scary Forrest from the books.
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #363,358
@363,262 (C)
> Your problems are your antisocial views and behavior.
Which of my views are antisocial? Which of my behaviors are antisocial?
> you are such a retarded piece of shit
care to share why you think this
> You are retarded.
care to share why you think this
> Your problems are your antisocial views and behavior.
Which of my views are antisocial? Which of my behaviors are antisocial?
> you are such a retarded piece of shit
care to share why you think this
> You are retarded.
care to share why you think this
Anonymous J double-posted this 14 years ago, 46 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #363,359
Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #363,360
@363,358 (J)
> doesn’t address substantive points
> continues retarded arguing for the sake of conflict, as established
lol
> doesn’t address substantive points
> continues retarded arguing for the sake of conflict, as established
lol
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #363,362
@363,295 (R)
> Yes. He blames molestation victims for their crimes,
No, I don't.
> encourages a "free state"
No, I don't. I encourage no state.
> even though he doesnt understand what taxes pay for,
Lol! I actually read every piece of legislation that is passed by my state legislature. I know exactly what taxes pay for.
> argues that he knows more than medical doctors,
No, I don't.
> and was kicked from his church for being gross.
I was accused of being gross. It wasn't even true.
> He's like a pervy Forrest Gump. Not charming Forrest from the movie, but scary Forrest from the books.
If you're going to post about me anonymously you could at least lose the double spacing.
> Yes. He blames molestation victims for their crimes,
No, I don't.
> encourages a "free state"
No, I don't. I encourage no state.
> even though he doesnt understand what taxes pay for,
Lol! I actually read every piece of legislation that is passed by my state legislature. I know exactly what taxes pay for.
> argues that he knows more than medical doctors,
No, I don't.
> and was kicked from his church for being gross.
I was accused of being gross. It wasn't even true.
> He's like a pervy Forrest Gump. Not charming Forrest from the movie, but scary Forrest from the books.
If you're going to post about me anonymously you could at least lose the double spacing.
Anonymous J double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #363,365
@363,360 (K)
> substantive points
> "you are x because I said so"
Even you can troll better than this.
> substantive points
> "you are x because I said so"
Even you can troll better than this.
Anonymous R replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #363,366
@363,362 (J)
You do blame molestation victims. Remember all of the playing the devils advocate? Also, you dont understand taxes at all. Every argument you try and say that you could privately pay for every thing that you use daily. Which is a lie, and childish. Also, you were kicked from your church for being a pervert.
You do blame molestation victims. Remember all of the playing the devils advocate? Also, you dont understand taxes at all. Every argument you try and say that you could privately pay for every thing that you use daily. Which is a lie, and childish. Also, you were kicked from your church for being a pervert.
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #363,367
@363,365 (J)
Your desire for conflict and opposition to your peers shows a severe emotional problem. Please, seek help before you coerce more children into non consensual relationships.
Your desire for conflict and opposition to your peers shows a severe emotional problem. Please, seek help before you coerce more children into non consensual relationships.
Ashe !bbKEtchUp. replied with this 14 years ago, 6 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #363,368
@363,260 (J)
So you think it's true, but not important? I always figured that religious people took their religion seriously. Also isn't the point to worship God, not to establish reputation for yourself? I remember that Jesus said in the Bible that the Pharisees who preached loudly on the street corners instead of quietly in their rooms have already had their reward, so will not get their reward in the next life. Do you not think that it is putting your soul in danger?
So you think it's true, but not important? I always figured that religious people took their religion seriously. Also isn't the point to worship God, not to establish reputation for yourself? I remember that Jesus said in the Bible that the Pharisees who preached loudly on the street corners instead of quietly in their rooms have already had their reward, so will not get their reward in the next life. Do you not think that it is putting your soul in danger?
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #363,369
@previous (Ashe !bbKEtchUp.)
He needs people to feed his ego and has successfully spent long enough with a group that they won't reject him for being retarded like so many other groups have and will.
He needs people to feed his ego and has successfully spent long enough with a group that they won't reject him for being retarded like so many other groups have and will.
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #363,383
@363,366 (R)
> You do blame molestation victims. Remember all of the playing the devils advocate?
You are beyond salvation if this is your argument.
> Also, you dont understand taxes at all. Every argument you try and say that you could privately pay for every thing that you use daily. Which is a lie, and childish.
Just because you say so? Great argument. Do you not understand the concept of demonstrating your point?
@363,367 (C)
If anyone disagrees with you, they are mental ill. Got it. I have never coerced a child in a non=consensual relationship, or even had a consensual relationship with a child, and I do not seek to have one.
@363,368 (Ashe !bbKEtchUp.)
> So you think it's true, but not important?
I think the Catholic Church is the best church, but I don't think my denomination is deficient enough to justify me leaving, considering the impact the church has on the local community, my level of involvement, etc.
> Also isn't the point to worship God, not to establish reputation for yourself?
The point is not just to worship God, which could be done alone, but to come together as a community to edify each other, and coordinate to spread the Gospel and to care for the community. I have worked hard to gain a level of trust and be given responsibility, that it would be unwise to just throw away.
> You do blame molestation victims. Remember all of the playing the devils advocate?
You are beyond salvation if this is your argument.
> Also, you dont understand taxes at all. Every argument you try and say that you could privately pay for every thing that you use daily. Which is a lie, and childish.
Just because you say so? Great argument. Do you not understand the concept of demonstrating your point?
@363,367 (C)
If anyone disagrees with you, they are mental ill. Got it. I have never coerced a child in a non=consensual relationship, or even had a consensual relationship with a child, and I do not seek to have one.
@363,368 (Ashe !bbKEtchUp.)
> So you think it's true, but not important?
I think the Catholic Church is the best church, but I don't think my denomination is deficient enough to justify me leaving, considering the impact the church has on the local community, my level of involvement, etc.
> Also isn't the point to worship God, not to establish reputation for yourself?
The point is not just to worship God, which could be done alone, but to come together as a community to edify each other, and coordinate to spread the Gospel and to care for the community. I have worked hard to gain a level of trust and be given responsibility, that it would be unwise to just throw away.
OBAMA2012 !CaTLdYmooc replied with this 14 years ago, 3 days later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #364,220
lol
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #364,256
@363,383 (J)Oh yea Catholic Priests cum together and if only they would just cum with each other and leave the kiddies alone.