Topic: You motherfuckers need Jesus!!!
Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #23,036
This is gross as fuck and you guys need to get out into the real world and get laid to real girls. You guys don't realize that the rest of society is mocking you. Do you really want to lay on your deathbed and realize that you've done nothing in life and the entire world thinks you're a loser? Come on guys. Fix yourself
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #360,904
@OP
You need Dan Savage.
You need Dan Savage.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #360,913
> You motherfuckers need Jesus!!!
> get out into the real world and get laid to real girls
Ah yes, a well-known Christian teaching. All of the evangelicals mention this as often as possible.
> get out into the real world and get laid to real girls
Ah yes, a well-known Christian teaching. All of the evangelicals mention this as often as possible.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #361,029
you think that's bad? you've obviously never been to scatchan.net. i say .net to be sure you can find it. if you go there, you'll see that by internet standards minichan is basically the moral compass.Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #361,035
I like how OP is implying that all problems are fixed by fucking. Good job, fella.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 20 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #361,210
This thread is grate. Getting laid = accomplishing something in life. Lol. And we wonder why women are taking over.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #361,244
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #361,245
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #361,246
Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #361,247
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #361,251
@previous (H)
really busy re work. you can find numbers more current then my quick look up 2010
http://www.dol.gov/wb/factsheets/Qf-laborforce-10.htm
Of the 123 million women age 16 years and over in the U.S., 72 million, or 58.6 percent, were labor force participants—working or looking for work.
Women comprised 47 percent of the total U.S. labor force.
Women are projected to account for 51 percent of the increase in total labor force growth between 2008 and 2018.
66 million women were employed in the U.S.--73 percent of employed women worked on full-time jobs, while 27 percent worked on a part-time basis.
The largest percentage of employed women (40.6 percent) worked in management, professional, and related occupations; 32.0 percent worked in sales and office occupations; 21.3 percent in service occupations; 5.2 percent in production, transportation, and material moving occupations; and 0.9 percent in natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations.
The largest percentage of employed Asian, white, and black women (46.1 percent , 40.6 percent, and 33.8 percent, respectively) worked in management, professional, and related occupations. Hispanic women showed their strongest attachment to service occupations at 33.2 percent.
The unemployment rate for all women was 8.6 percent and for men it was 10.5 percent. Among female race/ethnic groups, Asian women continue to have the lowest unemployment rate of 7.5 percent. For white women, it was 7.7 percent; Hispanic women, 12.3 percent; and black women, 13.8 percent.
The median weekly earnings of women who were full-time wage and salary workers were $669, or 81 percent of men’s $824. When comparing the median weekly earnings of persons aged 16 to 24, young women earned 95 percent of what young men earned ($422 and $443, respectively).
The 30 occupations with the highest median weekly earnings among women who were full-time wage and salary workers were--
Physicians and surgeons, $1,618
Pharmacists, $1,605
Chief executives, $1,598
Lawyers, $1,461
Computer software engineers, $1,445
Computer and information systems managers, $1,415
Physical therapists, $1,208
Speech-language pathologists, $1,184
Computer programmers, $1,177
Human resources managers, $1,170
Management analysts, $1,164
Medical and health services managers, $1,163
Education administrators, $1,137
Physician assistants, $1,129
Occupational therapists, $1,094
Purchasing managers, $1,050
Managers, all other, $1,045
Psychologists, $1,041
Registered nurses, $1,039
Public relations specialists, $1,034
Financial managers, $1,022
Computer scientists and systems analysts, $1,013
Compliance officers, except agriculture, construction, health and safety,
and transportation, $1,013
Post secondary teachers, $1,011
Public relations managers, $1,010
Network systems and data communications analysts, $1,010
Marketing and sales managers, $1,010
Respiratory therapists, $996
General and operations managers, $972
Insurance underwriters, $970
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment and Earnings, January 2011, Annual Averages. Web site: http://www.bls.gov/opub/ee/empearn201101.pdf
Women accounted for 51.5 percent of all workers in the high-paying management, professional, and related occupations. Here is just a sample of these occupations where women were the larger percentage of those employed:
Registered nurses………………………………………………………91.1 %
Elementary and middle school teachers………………………81.8
Medical and health services managers…………………………72.5
Psychologists……………………………………………………………66.7
Tax examiners, collectors, and revenue agents……………66.1
Education administrators……………………………………………63.0
Advertising and promotions managers……………………… 61.1
Accountants and auditors……………………………………… 60.1
Public relations managers………………………………………… 60.0
Insurance underwriters…………………………………………… 59.3
Medical scientists…………………………………………………… 53.7
Financial managers………………………………………………… 53.2
really busy re work. you can find numbers more current then my quick look up 2010
http://www.dol.gov/wb/factsheets/Qf-laborforce-10.htm
Of the 123 million women age 16 years and over in the U.S., 72 million, or 58.6 percent, were labor force participants—working or looking for work.
Women comprised 47 percent of the total U.S. labor force.
Women are projected to account for 51 percent of the increase in total labor force growth between 2008 and 2018.
66 million women were employed in the U.S.--73 percent of employed women worked on full-time jobs, while 27 percent worked on a part-time basis.
The largest percentage of employed women (40.6 percent) worked in management, professional, and related occupations; 32.0 percent worked in sales and office occupations; 21.3 percent in service occupations; 5.2 percent in production, transportation, and material moving occupations; and 0.9 percent in natural resources, construction, and maintenance occupations.
The largest percentage of employed Asian, white, and black women (46.1 percent , 40.6 percent, and 33.8 percent, respectively) worked in management, professional, and related occupations. Hispanic women showed their strongest attachment to service occupations at 33.2 percent.
The unemployment rate for all women was 8.6 percent and for men it was 10.5 percent. Among female race/ethnic groups, Asian women continue to have the lowest unemployment rate of 7.5 percent. For white women, it was 7.7 percent; Hispanic women, 12.3 percent; and black women, 13.8 percent.
The median weekly earnings of women who were full-time wage and salary workers were $669, or 81 percent of men’s $824. When comparing the median weekly earnings of persons aged 16 to 24, young women earned 95 percent of what young men earned ($422 and $443, respectively).
The 30 occupations with the highest median weekly earnings among women who were full-time wage and salary workers were--
Physicians and surgeons, $1,618
Pharmacists, $1,605
Chief executives, $1,598
Lawyers, $1,461
Computer software engineers, $1,445
Computer and information systems managers, $1,415
Physical therapists, $1,208
Speech-language pathologists, $1,184
Computer programmers, $1,177
Human resources managers, $1,170
Management analysts, $1,164
Medical and health services managers, $1,163
Education administrators, $1,137
Physician assistants, $1,129
Occupational therapists, $1,094
Purchasing managers, $1,050
Managers, all other, $1,045
Psychologists, $1,041
Registered nurses, $1,039
Public relations specialists, $1,034
Financial managers, $1,022
Computer scientists and systems analysts, $1,013
Compliance officers, except agriculture, construction, health and safety,
and transportation, $1,013
Post secondary teachers, $1,011
Public relations managers, $1,010
Network systems and data communications analysts, $1,010
Marketing and sales managers, $1,010
Respiratory therapists, $996
General and operations managers, $972
Insurance underwriters, $970
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employment and Earnings, January 2011, Annual Averages. Web site: http://www.bls.gov/opub/ee/empearn201101.pdf
Women accounted for 51.5 percent of all workers in the high-paying management, professional, and related occupations. Here is just a sample of these occupations where women were the larger percentage of those employed:
Registered nurses………………………………………………………91.1 %
Elementary and middle school teachers………………………81.8
Medical and health services managers…………………………72.5
Psychologists……………………………………………………………66.7
Tax examiners, collectors, and revenue agents……………66.1
Education administrators……………………………………………63.0
Advertising and promotions managers……………………… 61.1
Accountants and auditors……………………………………… 60.1
Public relations managers………………………………………… 60.0
Insurance underwriters…………………………………………… 59.3
Medical scientists…………………………………………………… 53.7
Financial managers………………………………………………… 53.2
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #361,265
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #361,266
Ash !bbKEtchUp. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 12 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #361,343
copypasta
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #361,359
@previous (Ash !bbKEtchUp.)
Not really. I might be committing political suicide by saying this, and be accused of selling out, but here it goes: I want to get away from the Kimmo stylesheet altogether. I want to get away from the idea of being a chan altogether. I want to create a discussion board that is more like a social network than anything else. It would be like Facebook, with the focus being on the board and real discussion rather than it focusing on groups, likes, wall-posts, pokes, games, etc. It would give you the option to post anonymously rather than forcing you to register, but registering and having a profile would be an option. It would be like twitter, but would encourage intelligent conversation rather than 100 character "tweets" that seem to be dumbing down the nation. It would be like a blog, but people would actually care about it, because rather than being a blog in the sense that it's a single website about you, it's interactive and everyone is tied together through the social network. You could have a "friends" list, but it would be more like a list of favorite posters where you watch for their posts/threads, rather than a restrictive list. It will be like Facebook WAS, back when people actually joined groups and went into the discussion tab to have actual discussion, before they started putting ridiculous restrictions on groups and encouraging people to just "like" corporations instead and have you play mindless games so they can sell your information to advertisers. You'd still have the same freedom of speech, and be able to post anything from chan bullshit to legitimate reporters using it as a medium to post their news articles or blogs. It would be like youtube, but the focus would be on discussion rather than video, but the idea of it being user generated content is the same. Privacy would never be an issue, because you'd still have the option to post anonymously and no logging in would be required.
I warned you it was political suicide. I know some of you must think I'm joking and that I just don't get it. I know I probably sound like Kimmo several years ago, posting about stuff where it was obvious to everyone but him that only he thought his ideas were a good idea. The difference is, I'm not a sociopath, I don't want to do this because I think I deserve a billion dollars, I don't think it's guaranteed to be the next big thing, and I understand that it's not for everyone, so I have no intention of spamming my site all over the god damn place trying to attract attention from people who will obviously hate it. I just know there are a lot of people just like me out there who miss the old youtube, miss the old facebook, hate the teenage drama of myspace, and are sickened by the watered down content and pointless updates of twitter. There are people out there who love the free speech of blogs and chan sites, but hate the meaningless shit that fills most chans and the fact that most blogs are just people who only want to talk about themselves or think they're real reporters because they have a website. I know the internet market is already flooded with so many social networking and sharing sites that I might just be insane. Maybe I really am like Kimmo and I'm trying to reinvent the wheel just because there's not a site out there that's not EXACTLY what I want it to be. If that's the case, just say so. If there's a social networking site out there that's ridiculously close to what I'm describing here, just say so, and I'll leave you alone and I'll go there instead. I'm not going to be like Kimmo and go ahead with an idea when everyone tells me it's lame and refuse to take any advice and call anyone who disagree with me a troll, but if you read this and you feel the same way, if your're like me and feel like there are millions of people out there who feel the same way we do, if your're sick of settling for what's already out there and feel like the internet needs a new niche for everyone who is like us...
JOIN ME
Or don't because I realize that was a little over the top.
Not really. I might be committing political suicide by saying this, and be accused of selling out, but here it goes: I want to get away from the Kimmo stylesheet altogether. I want to get away from the idea of being a chan altogether. I want to create a discussion board that is more like a social network than anything else. It would be like Facebook, with the focus being on the board and real discussion rather than it focusing on groups, likes, wall-posts, pokes, games, etc. It would give you the option to post anonymously rather than forcing you to register, but registering and having a profile would be an option. It would be like twitter, but would encourage intelligent conversation rather than 100 character "tweets" that seem to be dumbing down the nation. It would be like a blog, but people would actually care about it, because rather than being a blog in the sense that it's a single website about you, it's interactive and everyone is tied together through the social network. You could have a "friends" list, but it would be more like a list of favorite posters where you watch for their posts/threads, rather than a restrictive list. It will be like Facebook WAS, back when people actually joined groups and went into the discussion tab to have actual discussion, before they started putting ridiculous restrictions on groups and encouraging people to just "like" corporations instead and have you play mindless games so they can sell your information to advertisers. You'd still have the same freedom of speech, and be able to post anything from chan bullshit to legitimate reporters using it as a medium to post their news articles or blogs. It would be like youtube, but the focus would be on discussion rather than video, but the idea of it being user generated content is the same. Privacy would never be an issue, because you'd still have the option to post anonymously and no logging in would be required.
I warned you it was political suicide. I know some of you must think I'm joking and that I just don't get it. I know I probably sound like Kimmo several years ago, posting about stuff where it was obvious to everyone but him that only he thought his ideas were a good idea. The difference is, I'm not a sociopath, I don't want to do this because I think I deserve a billion dollars, I don't think it's guaranteed to be the next big thing, and I understand that it's not for everyone, so I have no intention of spamming my site all over the god damn place trying to attract attention from people who will obviously hate it. I just know there are a lot of people just like me out there who miss the old youtube, miss the old facebook, hate the teenage drama of myspace, and are sickened by the watered down content and pointless updates of twitter. There are people out there who love the free speech of blogs and chan sites, but hate the meaningless shit that fills most chans and the fact that most blogs are just people who only want to talk about themselves or think they're real reporters because they have a website. I know the internet market is already flooded with so many social networking and sharing sites that I might just be insane. Maybe I really am like Kimmo and I'm trying to reinvent the wheel just because there's not a site out there that's not EXACTLY what I want it to be. If that's the case, just say so. If there's a social networking site out there that's ridiculously close to what I'm describing here, just say so, and I'll leave you alone and I'll go there instead. I'm not going to be like Kimmo and go ahead with an idea when everyone tells me it's lame and refuse to take any advice and call anyone who disagree with me a troll, but if you read this and you feel the same way, if your're like me and feel like there are millions of people out there who feel the same way we do, if your're sick of settling for what's already out there and feel like the internet needs a new niche for everyone who is like us...
JOIN ME
Or don't because I realize that was a little over the top.