Ash !bbKEtchUp. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later[^][v]#359,550
inb4 paedophilia discussion.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 minutes after the original post[^][v]#359,551
Yes. Eventually, society will become so permissive that there will be a taboo against having taboos. Some daring generation of future youngsters will break that final taboo as well and break the universe along with it.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^][v]#359,552
@359,550 (Ash !bbKEtchUp.)
Well, it's not really a "taboo."
It's really more of an objectively immoral and horrible crime.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^][v]#359,553
Yes, definitely. None of us know how it's going to be in 200 years.
@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
Exactly how most people would have described homosexuality 30 or 40 years ago.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#359,555
@previous (E)
That's not true. If you were alive 30 or 40 years ago you'd know that gays were everywhere, they just didn't rub it in people's faces like they do today becuase they they used to be classy instead of flaming.
I think you mean some groups of christians were really anti-fag and made a huge stink about it, bug like today smart people just ignore them.
However, raping children is objectively wrong. Even in the olden days the greeks were considered disgusting perverts and look at them now, their whole country in insolvent.
Don't rape children, it automatically makes you a dangerous sicko everyone want to lock up. Everyone.
Go on, ask around. I bet zero people think any adult has the right to sex up children. Even pedophiles won't openly admit it.
If you are asking if its ok for you to jam Live Cockroaches up your bung hole & have friends and family accept that as normal? NO
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#359,587
Of course, but it will be entirely dependent on technology. You'll be able to call a computer simulated black person a nigger, but not a real person. You'll be able to rape a sex bot, but not a real woman. That sort of thing.
Ash !bbKEtchUp. replied with this 14 years ago, 54 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#359,588
Called it.
Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#359,592
@359,552 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
But can there be a crime if the victim is not a human?
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#359,594
@previous (H)
So you are looking forward to a time when you can kill a Cat and cook it for dinner - friends over and they will find that acceptable?
@previous (G)
We can kill a deer and cook it for dinner, so maybe. Deer are countryside pests and cats are city pests.
Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#359,603
@359,594 (G)
Nah. I'm really just waiting for pay per view dude on dude ultimate fighter matches where the victor rapes and murders the loser. Not because I'm violent or anything, but because this "sport" would make so much more sense to me if that were the conclusion.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#359,608
@previous (H)
Actually and I know this for a fact re work travels - There are places in Asia where that happens. Met people who went to shows - I mean if you consider the places that will sell a kid out of desperation, just about anything and everything takes place somewhere. Matches that end up with death of ultimate fighters is very common in Asia.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#359,611