Topic: LEGALIZE IT 2012
Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #22,868
:3postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later[^] [v] #358,536
Sure, why not? It isn't like there are more important things to worry about. Marijuana legalization is truly the issue of the century.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,542
@previous (postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Considering there are 3 arrests for marijuana every minute in the USA, roughly 90% of which for simple possession, I would say it's a pretty important issue. Unless you're ignorant or retarded you know weed is harmless. Why waste so much money investigating, arresting and incarcerating people for simple possession of cannabis? Pointless going after so many people for a victimless act when real crimes are going on.
Considering there are 3 arrests for marijuana every minute in the USA, roughly 90% of which for simple possession, I would say it's a pretty important issue. Unless you're ignorant or retarded you know weed is harmless. Why waste so much money investigating, arresting and incarcerating people for simple possession of cannabis? Pointless going after so many people for a victimless act when real crimes are going on.
Meta !PARAdoxiHw joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,545
buspup !!x+kkCmnF4 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,546
@358,536 (postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Its important. We have a lot of non violent offenders in crowded prisons over this.
Its important. We have a lot of non violent offenders in crowded prisons over this.
postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ replied with this 14 years ago, 16 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,547
Wait, is the government making people smoke weed so they can arrest them for it later? Or are people willingly commiting a crime, and then getting arrested?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 24 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,548
buspup !!x+kkCmnF4 replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,550
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 31 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,564
@previous (buspup !!x+kkCmnF4)
I support making it legal.
> A crime that hurts no one
Drinking and driving are fucked enough.
Smoking and then driving is more fucking up.
Legal would make it more available for fucking up.
I still support making it legal.
I support making it legal.
> A crime that hurts no one
Drinking and driving are fucked enough.
Smoking and then driving is more fucking up.
Legal would make it more available for fucking up.
I still support making it legal.
Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,616
buspup !!x+kkCmnF4 replied with this 14 years ago, 32 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,619
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,620
@previous (buspup !!x+kkCmnF4)
Moron?
I take that as a compliment because it comes from someone with a scat fetish.
Booze is bad enough re DUI
Adding Pot only makes it all so much worse.
I still support legalizing it. Just pointing out the pit falls.
Moron?
I take that as a compliment because it comes from someone with a scat fetish.
Booze is bad enough re DUI
Adding Pot only makes it all so much worse.
I still support legalizing it. Just pointing out the pit falls.
Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,622
buspup !!x+kkCmnF4 replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,625
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 12 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,634
postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ replied with this 14 years ago, 16 hours later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,728
Marijiuana should be legal, it isn't though. Therefore as of now, if you smoke and get caught, I have no sympathy for you.
Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 39 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #358,741
Anonymous F double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #359,357
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #359,448
@358,536 (postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Actually smartass, it's the issue of the last 2.5 centuries. It solidifies the state's sovereign constitutional right to control their own intrastate commerce. It's something the states were promised when the union was founded. On that fact alone, it's kind of a big deal.
Actually smartass, it's the issue of the last 2.5 centuries. It solidifies the state's sovereign constitutional right to control their own intrastate commerce. It's something the states were promised when the union was founded. On that fact alone, it's kind of a big deal.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #359,451
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 10 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #359,528
doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 day later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #360,342
information technology?