Topic: Romney's Tax Plan Published

Ks !KansasxqvM started this discussion 14 years ago #22,782

http://www.romneytaxplan.com/

beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #357,172

Oh lol.

Did you see the oppo file from McCain 2008?

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #357,176

cute

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #357,178

@OP

> http://www.romneytaxplan.com/

lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol
lolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololollolololololololololololol

Ks !KansasxqvM (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #357,182

@357,172 (beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc)
Hadn't seen it yet, looking at it now. I'm stoked for the debates tonight. Had I known the Biden/Ryan debate was gonna be so great I would have made a thread for everybody to watch it. I have never seen a debate that pleased me more.

beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #357,183

@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
Keep it in your pants. Thanks.

beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc double-posted this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #357,190

mitt romney are tried among likely voters who are women in a dozen battle ground states. it drew an angry response from joel benson, and he called the poll is an extreme outlier defying the trebds seen in every other battleground and national poll.

(Edited 20 seconds later.)

Ks !KansasxqvM (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 14 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #357,196

@previous (beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc)
I had to read that twice just to figure out what the hell they're trying to say.

beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #357,197

@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
It's like a Syntax post, but with better spelling.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #357,200

@357,190 (beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc)
I dont understand what that means.

Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #357,203

@357,190 (beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc)
Looks like Syntax got a job at NBC. Good for him.

Bad for the readers, though.

Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #357,206

@357,190 (beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc)
On the other hand.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/alan-abramowitz/is-romney-really-leading-_b_1969951.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

Edited by 10 Mile Thee for fast read:

Are results USA Today/Gallup swing state accurate? NO

10 Mile Editor - Credibility of Author Alan Abramowitz? Ultra Super based on his track record 2002 (99.5%) 2004 (99.7%) 2008 ( 100% of all 35 Senate races, and 11 gubernatorial races correctly.)

@357,197 (beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc)
Wot? eye use sperl checker so when my spreling is off its a William Shakespearchucker korrected off/on/more/better/version

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Ks !KansasxqvM (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #357,214

@previous (D)
Every time I see polls and mittens has any support at all...

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 30 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #357,215

@357,172 (beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc)

> dox, harassment

Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #357,221

@357,214 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
I follow all of this for Entertainment. I located those of the past (Polls-Bloggers-Prognosticators) who had the most accurate track record. Its easy to see which pollster was best. Harder to find the very best of the bloggers. I also watch the gambling market. Gamblers like Intrade in Ireland were about 2X more accurate then anyone else. Nate Silver 538 & Sabato+Alan & Pollyvote have World Class track records.

I figure if any of them were better then 99% accurate in past they are worth having fun with this year.

(Edited 46 seconds later.)

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 10 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #357,412

@previous (D)
i dont understand how anybody can call this entertainment.

its literally watching a roulette wheel that determines how your gonna get fucked over

Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #357,415

@previous (H)
Its exciting it has action. Movies about such are common and some are block busters. This one is real and no one is 100% sure of outcome except a few have a 30+ year track record of amazing accuracy.

Not at all roulette if you look at Ireland's track record on forecasting outcome. There are a couple of polls that were one point off!! One that got all the state results 100% spot on last time.

So do I have money on this? Gheeeeesh ya betcha. Finding true believers on the other side is so fucking easy. Minds made up. So sure that helps with the entertainment factor.

Need some proof?
http://electoralmap.net/2012/2008_election.php
Look at how amazing Intrade was and then look at bottom of page re results of Polls - Nate Silver 538 beat all of them as well as Sabto Crystal ball.

AND IF I Lose? I still win because if Romney were to win and if he is serious it puts more money in my wallet.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #357,429

At least he's not black.

Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #357,436

@357,415 (D)
With this much enthusiasm and faith in statistics you might be better off betting on horses. There are fewer factors to consider when betting on horses.

Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #357,438

@previous (C)
Its a matter of passion. How many who bet on a horse are truly, true believers? When people take sides in politics, often they leave reason and common sense behind.

For example. News media keeps talking about a point or three in the popular vote. Yet at no time has Romney been even close to that magic Electoral vote number. Not even the one sided Republican Polls, who admit they are Republican, give Romney a winning number. This one gives Romney more then anyone else.

http://polltracker.talkingpointsmemo.com/contests/us-president-12

The average Joe around town only pays attention to the popular vote. Remember a Bush who lost the popular vote but won the E-Vote? Horses? To many in a race.

Minichan