Topic: Female Mississippi Tea Pary leader wishes women were prohibited from voting
Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #22,744
http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/news/2012/jun/27/christian-rednecks-and-patriots-tea-party-chat/
Only Republicans can be this stupid.
Lane: I'm really going to set you back here. Probably the biggest turn we ever made was when the women got the right to vote.
What do you mean?
Lane: Our country might have been better off if it was still just men voting. There is nothing worse than a bunch of mean, hateful women. They are diabolical in how than can skewer a person. I do not see that in men. The whole time I worked, I'd much rather have a male boss than a female boss. Double-minded, you never can trust them.
What do you mean?
Lane: Our country might have been better off if it was still just men voting. There is nothing worse than a bunch of mean, hateful women. They are diabolical in how than can skewer a person. I do not see that in men. The whole time I worked, I'd much rather have a male boss than a female boss. Double-minded, you never can trust them.
Only Republicans can be this stupid.
(Edited 41 seconds later.)
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 27 minutes later[^] [v] #356,544
but she's right
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 35 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #356,546
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 19 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #356,552
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #356,574
does that mean that we cant trust her?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #356,585
I don't get it. Why shouldn't women be allowed to vote?
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #356,586
"We will constantly oppose and reverse progress of any kind"
-The Tea Party.
@previous (F)
Sup Catherine?
-The Tea Party.
@previous (F)
Sup Catherine?
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #356,587
@356,585 (F)
because many men hate that we now have laws against raping women and children. They blame feminism for all social problems, including every war. They also consider all violence perpetrated by males to be violence by proxy and also the fault of women.
because many men hate that we now have laws against raping women and children. They blame feminism for all social problems, including every war. They also consider all violence perpetrated by males to be violence by proxy and also the fault of women.
Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #356,599
@previous (E)
I thought the Jews get blamed for almost every war? And who the fuck in their right mind would rape a child?
I thought the Jews get blamed for almost every war? And who the fuck in their right mind would rape a child?
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #356,605
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #356,606
@356,587 (E)
> because many men hate that we now have laws against raping women and children.
A lot of those laws were around before "feminism" was a word.
> They blame feminism for all social problems, including every war.
No, but a lot of people find it funny that feminists were advocating equal voting rights during WWI but not an egalitarian draft.
> They also consider all violence perpetrated by males to be violence by proxy and also the fault of women.
No, but I do think that if a woman entices a man to fight "for" her than she should also be held responsible for the fallout.
Glad I cleared that up for you!
> because many men hate that we now have laws against raping women and children.
A lot of those laws were around before "feminism" was a word.
> They blame feminism for all social problems, including every war.
No, but a lot of people find it funny that feminists were advocating equal voting rights during WWI but not an egalitarian draft.
> They also consider all violence perpetrated by males to be violence by proxy and also the fault of women.
No, but I do think that if a woman entices a man to fight "for" her than she should also be held responsible for the fallout.
Glad I cleared that up for you!
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #356,632
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #356,665
@356,606 (I)
Which laws exactly existed before feminism? Which laws did feminism create?
Entice, trick, beguile. That's a lot of interesting gendered words. Tell us about how only females entice men into recruiting. Or on how men have to use violence to get goods or services, because they dont have vaginas.
Which laws exactly existed before feminism? Which laws did feminism create?
Entice, trick, beguile. That's a lot of interesting gendered words. Tell us about how only females entice men into recruiting. Or on how men have to use violence to get goods or services, because they dont have vaginas.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #356,668
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 18 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #356,674
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #356,687
@356,665 (E)
> Which laws exactly existed before feminism? Which laws did feminism create?
You really can't look this up? See, this is the type of intellectual laziness which defines your movement and makes us brush off to your dogma. Okay, why don't you look at what crime the author of The Canterbury Tales was accused of inflicting on Cecily Chaumpaigne and, more importantly, when this occurred.
> Entice, trick, beguile. That's a lot of interesting gendered words. Tell us about how only females entice men into recruiting. Or on how men have to use violence to get goods or services, because they dont have vaginas.
Right. Okay, I never said that men have to use violence for goods, so I'm going to just ignore that stupidity. As for the "enticing", one incident that comes to mind is when a knight in shining armor sodomized a man with a broom handle after his girlfriend claimed he raped her. His reaction to this thread would probably not be far removed from your own.
> Which laws exactly existed before feminism? Which laws did feminism create?
You really can't look this up? See, this is the type of intellectual laziness which defines your movement and makes us brush off to your dogma. Okay, why don't you look at what crime the author of The Canterbury Tales was accused of inflicting on Cecily Chaumpaigne and, more importantly, when this occurred.
> Entice, trick, beguile. That's a lot of interesting gendered words. Tell us about how only females entice men into recruiting. Or on how men have to use violence to get goods or services, because they dont have vaginas.
Right. Okay, I never said that men have to use violence for goods, so I'm going to just ignore that stupidity. As for the "enticing", one incident that comes to mind is when a knight in shining armor sodomized a man with a broom handle after his girlfriend claimed he raped her. His reaction to this thread would probably not be far removed from your own.
buspup !!x+kkCmnF4 replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #356,691
@previous (L)
You have no answer, and I'm in no movement.
Thats always the excuse about why men commit more sex crimes, and crimes in general. You actually believe that the sodomized an would want to take the vote from women? What are you even talking about?
You have no answer, and I'm in no movement.
Thats always the excuse about why men commit more sex crimes, and crimes in general. You actually believe that the sodomized an would want to take the vote from women? What are you even talking about?
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #356,717
@previous (buspup !!x+kkCmnF4)
> You actually believe that the sodomized an would want to take the vote from women?
> What are you even talking about?
What are you even talking about?
> You actually believe that the sodomized an would want to take the vote from women?
> What are you even talking about?
What are you even talking about?
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #356,748
I want to sodomize women (and men too).
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #356,776
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #356,789
It's like in stupid arabia, women have to wear burkas because they're the ones with out of control sex drives. Not the men who rape them. So make women wear sacks so they don't give men impure thoughts and get themselves raped.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 42 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #356,791
beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #356,825
@previous (E)
It's not that far removed from the way Western people tend to think about rape, either. Arabs are just more honest about it.
It's not that far removed from the way Western people tend to think about rape, either. Arabs are just more honest about it.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #356,828
@previous (beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc)
I agree completely. You know what I love? How some men will respond to disagreements by threatening rape, and yet still wonder why so many women are afraid of males. lol
I agree completely. You know what I love? How some men will respond to disagreements by threatening rape, and yet still wonder why so many women are afraid of males. lol
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #356,836
@previous (E)
Well they have good reason to be afraid of males, they are physically and mentally inferior.
Well they have good reason to be afraid of males, they are physically and mentally inferior.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #356,843
@356,828 (E)
> some men will respond to disagreements by threatening rape
wait, what? do people go around doing this? i've literally, in my whole life, never heard anyone respond to a disagreement by threatening rape.
> some men will respond to disagreements by threatening rape
wait, what? do people go around doing this? i've literally, in my whole life, never heard anyone respond to a disagreement by threatening rape.
Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #356,848
@356,828 (E)
> I agree completely. You know what I love? How some men will respond to disagreements by threatening rape, and yet still wonder why so many women are afraid of males.
Do you think that men as a sex should apologize on behalf of the minority of sociopaths in their midst? Oh, and some women can fear me for my body parts all they want. As long as they don't start pulling out guns when I begin to pass them on the sidewalk, I'm just grateful they do the avoiding for me. I'm not joking, I would rather be single than in a relationship with a woman who hates me to the core for my gender.
> I agree completely. You know what I love? How some men will respond to disagreements by threatening rape, and yet still wonder why so many women are afraid of males.
Do you think that men as a sex should apologize on behalf of the minority of sociopaths in their midst? Oh, and some women can fear me for my body parts all they want. As long as they don't start pulling out guns when I begin to pass them on the sidewalk, I'm just grateful they do the avoiding for me. I'm not joking, I would rather be single than in a relationship with a woman who hates me to the core for my gender.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 15 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #356,849
@356,836 (Q)
lol I love this because the same men who say this, also say that women are devious and can easily trick men. Sounds mentally inferior to me.
lol I love this because the same men who say this, also say that women are devious and can easily trick men. Sounds mentally inferior to me.
Anonymous E double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #356,850
@356,848 (S)
Its not hate, its fear. Instead of being made at women for being afraid of men Men, why arent you angry at the actual men who hurt women and children? They cause that fear, right?
Its not hate, its fear. Instead of being made at women for being afraid of men Men, why arent you angry at the actual men who hurt women and children? They cause that fear, right?
Anonymous E triple-posted this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #356,852
@356,848 (S)
Another thing. How exactly can you tell a rapist apart from a nice guy? Do rapists and murderers have a certain look about them?
Another thing. How exactly can you tell a rapist apart from a nice guy? Do rapists and murderers have a certain look about them?
Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 days later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #358,177
he is rightjust look at this chart
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #358,184
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #358,195
@358,177 (T)
OMG! It's almost as shocking as Al Gore's graph from "An Incontinent Truth." Probably has higher quality data backing it up though.
OMG! It's almost as shocking as Al Gore's graph from "An Incontinent Truth." Probably has higher quality data backing it up though.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 22 minutes later, 5 days after the original post[^] [v] #358,201
@358,184 (J)
If thats true, than they shouldnt be able to trick anyone. I do appreciate the bump for one of my excellent topics. Thank you.
If thats true, than they shouldnt be able to trick anyone. I do appreciate the bump for one of my excellent topics. Thank you.