Minichan

Topic: Can someone explain general relativity to me?

Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #22,631

Thank you.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later[^] [v] #355,450

Generally, things are related.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 3 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #355,451

@previous (B)
And then what of specific relativity?

Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #355,454

Yeah I will do it later on tonight after I nap and brush up a bit on some reading on the topic.

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #355,459

@355,451 (A)
Specific things that are specifically related, in a specific way.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #355,473

Image went missing

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 34 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,481

sound goes faster when the source moves toward you and slows down when the source moves away from you

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,485

@previous (E)
that's the Doppler effect.

Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,486

Image went missing@previous (F)
Agree with you on that. However the simple Doppler effect played a profound role in proving Relativity. (Red Shift)
Add that to Relativistic Doppler effect.

I needed to refresh up on Relativistic Doppler effect and found this cool graphic from Wiki - Another one is to large for MC to handle and no time to imgur URL
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e0/XYCoordinates.gif
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativistic_Doppler_effect

Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 33 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,493

The faster you go, the slower time is. You're welcome.

Ash !bbKEtchUp. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,498

@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)

That's special relativity.

Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 14 years ago, 19 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,511

@previous (Ash !bbKEtchUp.)
And it's far more interesting. You're welcome.

Ash !bbKEtchUp. replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,514

@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)

http://pbskids.org/arthur/games/factsopinions/

Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,515

Externally hosted image@previous (Ash !bbKEtchUp.)
You're welcome.

Ash !bbKEtchUp. replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,518

Externally hosted image@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)

squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 30 seconds later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,519

General relativity is a geometric model of spacetime. It basically says that matter and energy curve spacetime and that curves in space time effect an objects path by making it follow the curve. That's pretty much it.

Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,522

Image went missing@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
This is a case of curves in space time..If you have the time to follow the curves. That's pretty much it.

Ash !bbKEtchUp. replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,524

@previous (D)

If space time was a pretty woman, a lot more people would study physics.

Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,526

@previous (Ash !bbKEtchUp.)
If more women who looked like that taught physics, that would .......

Ash !bbKEtchUp. replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,527

@previous (D)

People would struggle to take them seriously academically.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #355,539

@355,526 (D)
A woman who looked like this has no reason to study anything, ever. Okay, maybe how to stay this fucking hot into well into her 40s, but anything beyond that is a waste of her time, skills and talent.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.