Minichan

Topic: Is a woman useless if she cannot have a child?

Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #22,511

Yes or no, and why or why not.
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
Yes. 9 47%
No. 10 53%

squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later[^] [v] #353,772

if she's already had sex with 5 guys she's probably had an abortion or two. Especially if they were females.

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #353,774

@OP

> Yes or no, and why or why not.

She can clean house - Cook breakfast lunch and dinner.

If she is cute with a nice body she can practice what it takes to make baby. Practice makes puuuuuuurrrrrfect without any need for end product (pun was not intended but what the heck)

None of this is valid IF She was picked up off the streets of China, and has been eating Dog Cat Snake Worms Cockroaches Rat & typical forms of mystery meat they serve in china and call it chicken.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #353,775

@previous (C)
Syntax, I'm sorry but your textvoice is horrible.

Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #353,776

@previous (D)
Simplified 4 just you.

She is still good for a toy and fuck.

Unless she is crap from China Streets.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 20 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #353,777

@previous (C)
Calvin Klein Obsessed with China dot jpeg.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 28 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #353,778

@previous (E)
@353,776 (C)
@353,775 (D)
@353,772 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
No abortions. She has a medical thing keeping her from having kids. like PCOS (Poly Cystic Ovary Syndrome).

Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 36 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #353,779

@previous (A)
Why did you cite me in that? Fool.

@353,776 (C)
Your posts cause me genuine mental pain.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 38 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #353,780

@353,778 (A)
Sorry man.

Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #353,782

@353,778 (A)
Multitasking re work & UN pdf doc re total kids on planet earth available for adoption (Officially) - Its 100's of Thousands.

Why 9 months for live birth when you can go to the store and get one already made? Comes in multi colors and may contain genes that will help with cooking tex mex.

Anonymous C double-posted this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #353,783

@353,779 (D)
Fact is your complaint is one I have read on occasion over the years.

I advise Mouse 101 course. -Then Read Skim 101 course.

Of the posts you do read with no problem. How many look like Willy Shakespeare?

squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #353,787

@353,778 (A)
That's what they always say after her uterus is blown from too many abortions.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #353,788

Syntax... your posts read like that of Eric Harris' godawful writing.
http://acolumbinesite.com/eric/writing/journal.html

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #353,789

Considering producing kids are the only thing women are good for, yes.

Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #353,794

@353,788 (F)
And your point is?

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #353,857

Oh wow, you'll never have an unwanted kid, or have to fuck a post pregnancy vag. Sucks to be you.

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #353,859

@353,783 (C)
You, Sir, are no Shakespeare.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 22 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,049

Let's see: No ability to birth children, not an animal I can own as livestock, and no penis. Hmmm. Personally, I have no use for this. So yeah, useless it is.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 32 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,070

@previous (J)
But she can still have sex, cook, clean and is a perfect housewife.

Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,081

@previous (A)
> implying a woman without children has any reason to cook, clean or be a housewife.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,085

@previous (J)
> implying she doesn't love the man enough to still do that and rub his feet when he gets home from work and treat him like a king.

(Edited 39 seconds later.)

Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,087

@previous (A)
> implying a woman could ever really love a man who's not the father of her children.

Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,089

@previous (J)
Reminds me of a friend who I worked with. He told me she was less then attractive. That was an understatement. She greeted us at the door with home made appetizers and frosty mugs of Ale.

Terrific cook. My guess is that he turned off the lights and imagined a model when he made love to her.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 59 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,090

@354,087 (J)
> implying she can't love him anyways just for being him and knowing they will have more money for themselves and growing old together.

Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,091

@354,089 (C)
Yet he had a fine woman at his disposal while you were merely visiting. Pay attention.

Anonymous J double-posted this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,093

@354,090 (A)
Oh dude you're just not getting it. Women are women. They are not men. A man might be able to love a woman for sex alone, but a woman simply cannot love a man solely for the sex. Social standing is just too important to them.

If you're not gonna give a woman children your last name had better be Rockefeller. That is all.

Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,094

@354,091 (J)
Yes that was true at the time. Not much later I ended up with a Model --- A lot of upkeep but worth it. Took some time to turn her into a great cook - We both learned to cook lol

Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,096

@previous (C)
Well I hope you're not telling her how hot she is our how lucky you are to have her. Such things communicate desperation to women-folk, which makes you an unsuitable suitor.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 27 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,098

@354,093 (J)
Dude, not just for sex. Like, common interests and the like. Like your bestfriend, minus a penis, balls and throw in a pussy and tits.

Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,100

@354,096 (J)
Married her and later much later divorced her. Made the right choice and later made a correction.

Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,104

@354,098 (A)
Hmmm. Semms gay to me. I mean, if you want to fuck your best friend why not just man up and go for it. You can still fuck women as well, just so you know.

Motherhood is the apex of femininity. Always has been and always will be. But hey, if you prefer a dude with tits that's your deal man.

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,106

@previous (J)
No dude, the woman can be your best friend.

Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,107

@previous (A)
Sure, if you're a homo.

Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,109

@354,106 (A)
I look at this thread and think, "Why don't women like nice guys?

Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,110

@previous (H)
They do, just some of the hotter ones think they are gods gift to men, and their pussys are magical.

Magically with the clap I say.

Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #354,115

@previous (A)
They like nice guys until some asshole with a bigger cock comes along. Sure, a woman will settle for a nice guy when she's desperate. But even then, it's only to make herself appear more desirable to the REAL men.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.