Topic: So the only way to deny Obama my vote...
Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #22,387
Is to vote for Romney. No wonder such tools always win.
TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later[^] [v] #352,285
Like it matters for who you vote in America. The difference between you and Korea is that they accept they have one Great Leader and pretend to worship him, while you guys go and vote for the same shit over and over again no matter who you pick.
Ks !KansasxqvM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,286
@previous (TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k)
Yeah because George Bush is exactly the same as Barack Obama. Our political system does work, we just have a loooot of retarded rednecks in our country.
Yeah because George Bush is exactly the same as Barack Obama. Our political system does work, we just have a loooot of retarded rednecks in our country.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 12 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,287
@352,285 (TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k)
Note those things like "freedom of speech" and "elections" that America has. They can elect different leaders and freely express opinions about them.
Also:
> pretending to worship him
They're not pretending anything, at least the vast majority of them. Theirs told to worship Dear Leader and the state from birth. They're all indoctrinated into it.
Note those things like "freedom of speech" and "elections" that America has. They can elect different leaders and freely express opinions about them.
Also:
> pretending to worship him
They're not pretending anything, at least the vast majority of them. Theirs told to worship Dear Leader and the state from birth. They're all indoctrinated into it.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,289
@352,285 (TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k)
Dude people where you live cut each others' heads off with pocketknives
Shut up
Dude people where you live cut each others' heads off with pocketknives
Shut up
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Born this Way !dLadyGAgAA joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,290
gary johnson 2012
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 9 seconds later, 18 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,291
> critiquing American politics
> failing to note the money that corrupts the process is the same money that owns the media
> 2012
ISHYGDDT
> failing to note the money that corrupts the process is the same money that owns the media
> 2012
ISHYGDDT
doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,292
@352,286 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
@352,285 (TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k)
@352,287 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
it's just that a lot of votes get thrown away because of region-based voting. otherwise smaller parties have something of a chance too.
@352,285 (TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k)
@352,287 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
it's just that a lot of votes get thrown away because of region-based voting. otherwise smaller parties have something of a chance too.
TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k replied with this 14 years ago, 16 minutes later, 37 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,298
@352,289 (beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc)
Even retards like Croatians voted for change last elections. Labor party got seats in the parlament and are getting stronger and stronger.
And the el presidente here is actually agnostic with a college degree, plays a few instruments and acts like a gentleman in public (+ I hit up on his daughter apparently on a high school graduation party... what can I say, I have a thing for 18 year old tipsy chicks).
So yeah, even a shithole like Croatia is more democratic than your US of A.
And yeah, I can block off an attacker with a pocket knife, good luck doing the same with niggers and guns :) <3
Even retards like Croatians voted for change last elections. Labor party got seats in the parlament and are getting stronger and stronger.
And the el presidente here is actually agnostic with a college degree, plays a few instruments and acts like a gentleman in public (+ I hit up on his daughter apparently on a high school graduation party... what can I say, I have a thing for 18 year old tipsy chicks).
So yeah, even a shithole like Croatia is more democratic than your US of A.
And yeah, I can block off an attacker with a pocket knife, good luck doing the same with niggers and guns :) <3
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 42 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,300
@previous (TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k)
How is Romney anything like Obama? Obama wants to legalise gay marriage, for christ's sake. They're completely different candidates with very different policies.
How is Romney anything like Obama? Obama wants to legalise gay marriage, for christ's sake. They're completely different candidates with very different policies.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc replied with this 14 years ago, 42 seconds later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,301
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Plus Obama is actually agnostic with a college degree, plays a few instruments and acts like a gentleman in public (+ I hit up on his daughter apparently on a high school graduation party... what can I say, I have a thing for 18 year old tipsy chicks).
Plus Obama is actually agnostic with a college degree, plays a few instruments and acts like a gentleman in public (+ I hit up on his daughter apparently on a high school graduation party... what can I say, I have a thing for 18 year old tipsy chicks).
TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 47 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,303
@352,300 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
That are minor differences to keep the crowd entertained withing america (fighting over gay marriage is fun).
But the big issues like wars for oil... guess what? Nothing changes...
That are minor differences to keep the crowd entertained withing america (fighting over gay marriage is fun).
But the big issues like wars for oil... guess what? Nothing changes...
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,304
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 52 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,305
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 8 seconds later, 53 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,306
@352,303 (TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k)
Does those things change in Croatia either? Are any of your mainstream political leaders going to stand up and say "let's rethink what we're doing with oil"?
Does those things change in Croatia either? Are any of your mainstream political leaders going to stand up and say "let's rethink what we're doing with oil"?
beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,309
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Maybe you'd understand if you lived in a country where it was notable for a leader to have a college degree?
Maybe you'd understand if you lived in a country where it was notable for a leader to have a college degree?
doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 57 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #352,311
doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ double-posted this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,312
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 24 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,313
@352,303 (TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k)
My neighborhood has never been bombed. My state hasn't been attacked since the Alamo. My countries leaderhip hasn't executed political rivals in a few centuries. We even manage to peacefully hand over governmental powers every 4-8 years and i can't remember the last time a violent coup siezed our capital.
All in all it's been pretty good. Sure we've got problems, every country does, but our system doesn't open the door to the same kind of volatility that produced the Nazi Party. Sure, change happens slowly, but it's better to have a progressive trend over centuries than have massive changes that quickly alter the way government operates. If we did that we'd have made some hitlers too.
My neighborhood has never been bombed. My state hasn't been attacked since the Alamo. My countries leaderhip hasn't executed political rivals in a few centuries. We even manage to peacefully hand over governmental powers every 4-8 years and i can't remember the last time a violent coup siezed our capital.
All in all it's been pretty good. Sure we've got problems, every country does, but our system doesn't open the door to the same kind of volatility that produced the Nazi Party. Sure, change happens slowly, but it's better to have a progressive trend over centuries than have massive changes that quickly alter the way government operates. If we did that we'd have made some hitlers too.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,317
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,318
@352,303 (TheSheep !kJ.A4PF7.k)
Because much of the public supports war. Refer to my first response to you.
God bless America.
Because much of the public supports war. Refer to my first response to you.
God bless America.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,321
@previous (Ks !KansasxqvM)
And so does Obama. He hasn't deviated from Bush's plans and timetables, other than going even more apeshit with drones.
And so does Obama. He hasn't deviated from Bush's plans and timetables, other than going even more apeshit with drones.
Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,323
@OP
Obama does NOT need your vote. He is now so fucking far ahead and even Fox news has thrown in the towel by dropping its weekly Pres poll. Now uses Real Clear but hides the numerical bottom line.
Obama does NOT need your vote. He is now so fucking far ahead and even Fox news has thrown in the towel by dropping its weekly Pres poll. Now uses Real Clear but hides the numerical bottom line.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 15 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,325
Rocky Anderson gets my vote.Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 19 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,326
Ks !KansasxqvM replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,327
@352,321 (M)
The American people support war, and pro-war candidates.
Read this for some insight.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_opinion_in_the_United_States_on_the_invasion_of_Iraq
The American people support war, and pro-war candidates.
Read this for some insight.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_opinion_in_the_United_States_on_the_invasion_of_Iraq
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,328
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,329
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,331
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 5 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,332
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,335
@352,329 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Submitted
> more better
To Grammar web site
"Question
Why can't we say "more better" when we can say "much better"?
"Grammar's Response
We can't modify a comparative adjective with the comparative adverb "more" — mostly because it doesn't tell us anything that the comparative adjective wouldn't tell us by itself. Let's say I heat a substance on the stove. The substance is now hotter than it was before. And then I heat it some more. I have made it hotter, not more hotter (i.e., the "more" doesn't add anything to the comparison). However, if I want to intensify the process somehow, I can say that I made the substance "much hotter." In the same manner, I can say either that "Joe is taller than his brother," and if Joe grows over the summer, I can say that "Joe is now much taller than his brother," but not that he is "more taller." Also, "Sarah was beautiful last year" and now "She is even more beautiful" (but there is no way to impose a second comparison upon the comparative "more beautiful")."
I DID NOT READ THE REPLY Because it was tl;dr
Submitted
> more better
To Grammar web site
"Question
Why can't we say "more better" when we can say "much better"?
"Grammar's Response
We can't modify a comparative adjective with the comparative adverb "more" — mostly because it doesn't tell us anything that the comparative adjective wouldn't tell us by itself. Let's say I heat a substance on the stove. The substance is now hotter than it was before. And then I heat it some more. I have made it hotter, not more hotter (i.e., the "more" doesn't add anything to the comparison). However, if I want to intensify the process somehow, I can say that I made the substance "much hotter." In the same manner, I can say either that "Joe is taller than his brother," and if Joe grows over the summer, I can say that "Joe is now much taller than his brother," but not that he is "more taller." Also, "Sarah was beautiful last year" and now "She is even more beautiful" (but there is no way to impose a second comparison upon the comparative "more beautiful")."
I DID NOT READ THE REPLY Because it was tl;dr
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 15 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,336
@352,328 (N)
If the majority of Americans jumped head-first into a vat of hydrochloric acid, would you really do the same?
If the majority of Americans jumped head-first into a vat of hydrochloric acid, would you really do the same?
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,337
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Ans
If the majority of Americans are bright intelligent smart and cool enough to vote for Obama then I am most happy and pleased to stay away from the toxic Hydrochloric acid Romney offers up.
Ans
If the majority of Americans are bright intelligent smart and cool enough to vote for Obama then I am most happy and pleased to stay away from the toxic Hydrochloric acid Romney offers up.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,339
@previous (N)
Obama is a failure. He promised healthcare for all, but only gave us a tax. He promised a transparent administration, but gave us an administration that put Bradley Manning away for trying to enforce that promise. He promised hope and change, but gave neither. He is a pathological liar and won't get a vote from me. I'll be voting for a real socialist, one that promises REAL healthcare for ALL, not some bullshit little tax on on the middle class.
Obama is a failure. He promised healthcare for all, but only gave us a tax. He promised a transparent administration, but gave us an administration that put Bradley Manning away for trying to enforce that promise. He promised hope and change, but gave neither. He is a pathological liar and won't get a vote from me. I'll be voting for a real socialist, one that promises REAL healthcare for ALL, not some bullshit little tax on on the middle class.
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,340
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)Walter its a pleasure to show you the bad bad very bad news to make your day and there is much much much MUCH more if you want it. (You may get it anyway)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 23 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,341
@352,339 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Do you have any idea how hard it was for Obama to push through that extremely watered-down bill? If he made it any more "socialist", he would have lost the support of blue dog and other conservative democrats. It's pretty impressive that he got that bill passed, and upheld (narrowly) by the Supreme Court. Your expectations for what a president can accomplish are just unreasonably high.
Do you have any idea how hard it was for Obama to push through that extremely watered-down bill? If he made it any more "socialist", he would have lost the support of blue dog and other conservative democrats. It's pretty impressive that he got that bill passed, and upheld (narrowly) by the Supreme Court. Your expectations for what a president can accomplish are just unreasonably high.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,342
@352,339 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Walter, you should just go into politics and show them how it's done. You clearly know how it's done far better than any of those inexperienced buffoons.
Walter, you should just go into politics and show them how it's done. You clearly know how it's done far better than any of those inexperienced buffoons.
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,343
@352,341 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
What you having for dinner tomorrow night? Shrimp and Pork (pork was not planned) is what I will do. None of that sickly sweet kosher wine for me!
What you having for dinner tomorrow night? Shrimp and Pork (pork was not planned) is what I will do. None of that sickly sweet kosher wine for me!
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 38 seconds later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,344
@352,340 (N)
I wouldn't be too thrilled if Romney won, either. Both choices suck and that's why neither will get my vote. But, if you twisted my arm behind my back and made me choose between one of the two, I'd probably say I'd vote for Romney.
I wouldn't be too thrilled if Romney won, either. Both choices suck and that's why neither will get my vote. But, if you twisted my arm behind my back and made me choose between one of the two, I'd probably say I'd vote for Romney.
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,345
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Since you said your parents were going to vote for Romney, what state are they registered to vote in? I of course want to look up how much those votes will be worth. If its ND then its laffable.
Since you said your parents were going to vote for Romney, what state are they registered to vote in? I of course want to look up how much those votes will be worth. If its ND then its laffable.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,346
@352,343 (N)
I don't know yet. I'll probably just eat whatever is at the campus dining hall, even though it's usually shit.
I don't know yet. I'll probably just eat whatever is at the campus dining hall, even though it's usually shit.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,347
@352,345 (N)
They're registered to vote in Michigan, you retard. They are citizens of Michigan and have been so for about 12 years now.
They're registered to vote in Michigan, you retard. They are citizens of Michigan and have been so for about 12 years now.
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,350
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)''Now that is funny. Romney wanted to bankrupt the whole fucking state by forcing GM into bankruptcy. At that time no one including the pimple Bain, into having a fraction of the funds to keep GM going.
Good thing you dad would not have been in a Romney made mess. Well damn I did not really know how much Obama was ahead THERE until Now.''
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 14 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,355
@previous (N)
Just whom are you quoting?
Also, we have more than just GM. We have Chrysler (shit) and Ford (good). GM products range from good to shit and they had too many brands.
Just whom are you quoting?
Also, we have more than just GM. We have Chrysler (shit) and Ford (good). GM products range from good to shit and they had too many brands.
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 30 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,357
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
How can you say Chrysler is shit when they PAYED all the loan money back with Interest!
May 25, 2011
Chrysler is set to write the U.S. government a hefty check.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Chrysler has paid back $7.6 billion worth of high-interest bailout loans to the U.S. and Canadian governments, the automaker said Tuesday.
The payback included the $5.9 billion the carmaker owed in loans to U.S. taxpayers and the $1.7 billion owed to the Canadians, Chrysler said.
"The original loans were repaid in full, more than six years ahead of schedule, along with the payment of accrued interest and additional consideration," said Chrysler, in a statement.
"Chrysler paid between 7% and 14% interest on U.S. loans and as high as 20% interest on some of its Canadian loans."
Hell of a deal for USA Taxpayers.
I did not quote YOU. Correct me if I made an error.
How can you say Chrysler is shit when they PAYED all the loan money back with Interest!
May 25, 2011
Chrysler is set to write the U.S. government a hefty check.
NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Chrysler has paid back $7.6 billion worth of high-interest bailout loans to the U.S. and Canadian governments, the automaker said Tuesday.
The payback included the $5.9 billion the carmaker owed in loans to U.S. taxpayers and the $1.7 billion owed to the Canadians, Chrysler said.
"The original loans were repaid in full, more than six years ahead of schedule, along with the payment of accrued interest and additional consideration," said Chrysler, in a statement.
"Chrysler paid between 7% and 14% interest on U.S. loans and as high as 20% interest on some of its Canadian loans."
Hell of a deal for USA Taxpayers.
I did not quote YOU. Correct me if I made an error.
(Edited 52 seconds later.)
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 26 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,361
@previous (N)
Chrysler mostly makes shitty cars. Ford is the best in terms of car quality all-around and GM has a good high-end selection. Chrysler is quite lacking.
Chrysler mostly makes shitty cars. Ford is the best in terms of car quality all-around and GM has a good high-end selection. Chrysler is quite lacking.
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,362
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Given I currently own a BMW I have no stake in USA cars currently. Nor would I buy stock in any of them.
Given I currently own a BMW I have no stake in USA cars currently. Nor would I buy stock in any of them.
Born this Way !dLadyGAgAA replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,365
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,366
@352,286 (Ks !KansasxqvM)
Obama is George Bush on steroids. bombing more countries, more often, expanding healthcare more than bush did, more bailouts, patriot act, ndaa, etc.
Obama is George Bush on steroids. bombing more countries, more often, expanding healthcare more than bush did, more bailouts, patriot act, ndaa, etc.
Anonymous Q double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,367
Anonymous Q triple-posted this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,369
Syntax is all kinds of retarded.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,370
@352,365 (Born this Way !dLadyGAgAA)
lol
@352,366 (Q)
This. I do applaud him for trying to help with our sad excuse for healthcare, though. It's a shame the Republican party seems to not see the value of universal healthcare for every American.
lol
@352,366 (Q)
This. I do applaud him for trying to help with our sad excuse for healthcare, though. It's a shame the Republican party seems to not see the value of universal healthcare for every American.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q double-posted this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,372
Born this Way !dLadyGAgAA replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,373
@352,304 (I)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgnyZdClTpM
if this doesn't change your mind i don't know what will
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NgnyZdClTpM
if this doesn't change your mind i don't know what will
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 15 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,377
Born this Way !dLadyGAgAA replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,379
Solips-chan joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,380
Why does this matter anyway? You are all a product of my imagination, dreamed up to occupy myself for eternity in the void.
(Edited 30 seconds later.)
Anonymous Q replied with this 14 years ago, 14 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,389
@352,370 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
> Scarcity is the fundamental economic problem of having humans who have unlimited wants and needs in a world of limited resources.
> Scarcity is the fundamental economic problem of having humans who have unlimited wants and needs in a world of limited resources.
Anonymous Q double-posted this 14 years ago, 31 seconds later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,391
@352,372 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
I agree that it should be, just pointing out the currently states have the power to regulate marriages.
I agree that it should be, just pointing out the currently states have the power to regulate marriages.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,392
@352,389 (Q)
Universal healthcare will make everyone healthier, and seemingly paradoxially, reduce the demand for treatment by getting those whom are sick the treatment they need before they can spread their sickness to others (that may or may not be insured under the current system of "fuck you middle-class" policy).
Universal healthcare will make everyone healthier, and seemingly paradoxially, reduce the demand for treatment by getting those whom are sick the treatment they need before they can spread their sickness to others (that may or may not be insured under the current system of "fuck you middle-class" policy).
Handle !tYHPZ2dvu6 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,393
@352,372 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
If I can't marry someone of the same sex legally it's a government issue you retard.
If I can't marry someone of the same sex legally it's a government issue you retard.
advi !!3gpAcg/hF joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,397
Ten bucks says Romney calls Obama a nigger on national TV during the general election debates
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,399
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,401
advi !!3gpAcg/hF replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,405
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Yeah, but he's Santorum. Him doing it is too believable to be particularly funny.
Yeah, but he's Santorum. Him doing it is too believable to be particularly funny.
(Edited 16 seconds later.)
Anonymous Q replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,437
@352,392 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
> Universal healthcare will make everyone healthier
This could only ever be *most, and ignores the impossibly of rational calculation of socialized goods
> Universal healthcare will make everyone healthier
This could only ever be *most, and ignores the impossibly of rational calculation of socialized goods
Matthew Mueller !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 7 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,439
@previous (Q)
Well, there we have it people. We shouldn't support universal healthcare because it would only make most people heathier.
Well, there we have it people. We shouldn't support universal healthcare because it would only make most people heathier.
Anonymous U joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,447
@previous (Matthew Mueller !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
The same party who claims to love jesus, also refuses to feed the poor or pray in a closet. It's disgusting.
The same party who claims to love jesus, also refuses to feed the poor or pray in a closet. It's disgusting.
Anonymous Q replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,449
@352,439 (Matthew Mueller !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
We should excuse falsehoods and errors if they promote certain ends?
We should excuse falsehoods and errors if they promote certain ends?
Anonymous U replied with this 14 years ago, 45 seconds later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,450
@352,439 (Matthew Mueller !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
The same party who claims to love jesus, also refuses to feed the poor or pray in a closet. It's disgusting.
The same party who claims to love jesus, also refuses to feed the poor or pray in a closet. It's disgusting.
Matthew Mueller !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,451
@352,447 (U)
That is true. They are weird but so are the liberals that live in lily-white suburban neighborhoods while putting diversity on a fucking pedestal.
@352,449 (Q)
People should just be left to die of sickness because of falsehoods and errors in universal healthcare
That is true. They are weird but so are the liberals that live in lily-white suburban neighborhoods while putting diversity on a fucking pedestal.
@352,449 (Q)
People should just be left to die of sickness because of falsehoods and errors in universal healthcare
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,474
@352,397 (advi !!3gpAcg/hF)
The way he's been fucking up, this is hilariously feasible.
@352,367 (Q)
The point I was making is that they are very different candidates, in an attempt to disprove TheSheeps bizarre claim that people were basically voting for the same candidate anyway.
The way he's been fucking up, this is hilariously feasible.
@352,367 (Q)
The point I was making is that they are very different candidates, in an attempt to disprove TheSheeps bizarre claim that people were basically voting for the same candidate anyway.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,476
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> The way he's been fucking up, this is hilariously feasible.
You've convinced me. A vote for Mitt is vote for SNL to be funny again. He should run on that.
> The way he's been fucking up, this is hilariously feasible.
You've convinced me. A vote for Mitt is vote for SNL to be funny again. He should run on that.
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 31 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,480
@previous (A)
I have Tvio set for VH1 repeat of Tina Fey SNL - I think this is one of the great Sarah Palin set ups (Thur)
I have Tvio set for VH1 repeat of Tina Fey SNL - I think this is one of the great Sarah Palin set ups (Thur)
Anonymous Q replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,510
@352,451 (Matthew Mueller !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
When did I argue that? Oh wait, I didn't! You're full of shit!
When did I argue that? Oh wait, I didn't! You're full of shit!
Anonymous Q double-posted this 14 years ago, 35 seconds later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,511
@352,474 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
The point is that you couldn't even name one substantive point of difference between them.
The point is that you couldn't even name one substantive point of difference between them.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,513
@previous (Q)
Healthcare, education, economy.
Besides, gay marriage is a substantial difference, at least in what it infers about the candidates. Their views on it can tell us how progressive or conservative they are when it comes to social issues and religious nonsense.
Healthcare, education, economy.
Besides, gay marriage is a substantial difference, at least in what it infers about the candidates. Their views on it can tell us how progressive or conservative they are when it comes to social issues and religious nonsense.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 28 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,517
rainbow !dashjGLG/c joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,538
You could just not vote
I mean
I mean
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,539
rainbow !dashjGLG/c replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,540
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Sorry
I will immediately go and commit suicide in a dishonourabru manneru.
Sorry
I will immediately go and commit suicide in a dishonourabru manneru.
buspup !!x+kkCmnF4 replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,550
@352,451 (Matthew Mueller !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
You really cant argue "Oh they're weird". over the fact that these people claim to be the moral elite because of Jesus, but actively persecute the people that they should be protecting.
You really cant argue "Oh they're weird". over the fact that these people claim to be the moral elite because of Jesus, but actively persecute the people that they should be protecting.
Matthew Mueller !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,590
Anonymous Q replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,633
@352,513 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Just naming areas of policy is not actually the same as showing substantive differences in policy...
Just naming areas of policy is not actually the same as showing substantive differences in policy...
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,636
@previous (Q)
I'm not an American, so I don't know the finer points of their policies in those areas.
But I, and most other people, do know that they have very different views on said issues. For example, Romney has a boner for private schools and Obama wants to make healthcare more free.
Again, the only point I was making is that they are very different candidates, in regards to the Sheep's claim that they weren't all that different.
I'm not an American, so I don't know the finer points of their policies in those areas.
But I, and most other people, do know that they have very different views on said issues. For example, Romney has a boner for private schools and Obama wants to make healthcare more free.
Again, the only point I was making is that they are very different candidates, in regards to the Sheep's claim that they weren't all that different.
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,638
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Its common in USA for people to say it does not make much difference which party wins. Each makes promises just to win the election. Few are really trusted. The lesser of the evils is often how a vote choice is made. Bet where you live its much the same?
Its common in USA for people to say it does not make much difference which party wins. Each makes promises just to win the election. Few are really trusted. The lesser of the evils is often how a vote choice is made. Bet where you live its much the same?
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 16 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,640
@previous (N)
Well yes, politicians talk big and usually their influnce isn't felt too strongly on the common person. But they do still exert influence. Over here, Dave, our elected leader, raised tution fees. This annoyed lots of students. That was a result of lots of people voting for him, the majority of them knowing that his econmic policy involved cuts because he said as much when he was campaigning. The Liberal Democrats vowed not to do this (lol), so if tehy were elected then there would have been far fewer cuts.
Ergo, the public elected a leader having a broad idea of his economic policy, said leader went on to have a noticable impact on the lives of the public.
I would assume that same logic can be applied to Obama for at least some of his policies when he first ran for president.
Well yes, politicians talk big and usually their influnce isn't felt too strongly on the common person. But they do still exert influence. Over here, Dave, our elected leader, raised tution fees. This annoyed lots of students. That was a result of lots of people voting for him, the majority of them knowing that his econmic policy involved cuts because he said as much when he was campaigning. The Liberal Democrats vowed not to do this (lol), so if tehy were elected then there would have been far fewer cuts.
Ergo, the public elected a leader having a broad idea of his economic policy, said leader went on to have a noticable impact on the lives of the public.
I would assume that same logic can be applied to Obama for at least some of his policies when he first ran for president.
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,642
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
No question about
> But they do still exert influence.
Tuition fees are on the increase here and in my state because if it were a legit business, it would be bankrupt. State supported schools are in deeeeep dooo dooo, so students suffer.
Obama took on to much and promised to much. Romney is of course doing the same in order to win. It turns out that in either case I end up being better off (I think) Thing is one never can be sure.
I never expected Obama to win re his Race. Still shocked.
No question about
> But they do still exert influence.
Tuition fees are on the increase here and in my state because if it were a legit business, it would be bankrupt. State supported schools are in deeeeep dooo dooo, so students suffer.
Obama took on to much and promised to much. Romney is of course doing the same in order to win. It turns out that in either case I end up being better off (I think) Thing is one never can be sure.
I never expected Obama to win re his Race. Still shocked.
Matthew Mueller !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 39 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,653
College should be tuition-free. Thanks.
Anonymous Q replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,713
@352,636 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
> I'm not an American, so I don't know the finer points of their policies in those areas.
And yet you're in here, spouting off. Can you see the problem there?
> But I, and most other people, do know that they have very different views on said issues.
You KNOW this, you just can't name any substantive differences.
> For example, Romney has a boner for private schools and Obama wants to make healthcare more free.
Everyone has a boner for public schools. They're awesome. You can't make healthcare "more free", this sentence alone should disqualify you from ever talking about politics ever again.
> Again, the only point I was making is that they are very different candidates, in regards to the Sheep's claim that they weren't all that different.
Yeah, but they're obviously not very different. You are unable to name one point of substantive difference.
> I'm not an American, so I don't know the finer points of their policies in those areas.
And yet you're in here, spouting off. Can you see the problem there?
> But I, and most other people, do know that they have very different views on said issues.
You KNOW this, you just can't name any substantive differences.
> For example, Romney has a boner for private schools and Obama wants to make healthcare more free.
Everyone has a boner for public schools. They're awesome. You can't make healthcare "more free", this sentence alone should disqualify you from ever talking about politics ever again.
> Again, the only point I was making is that they are very different candidates, in regards to the Sheep's claim that they weren't all that different.
Yeah, but they're obviously not very different. You are unable to name one point of substantive difference.
Anonymous Q double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,716
Anonymous O replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,744
Anonymous Q replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,748
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,756
@352,716 (Q)
Why the fuck not? How is it you'be been conditioned to reject a world with abundance for all.
Why the fuck not? How is it you'be been conditioned to reject a world with abundance for all.
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 54 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,762
@352,716 (Q)
One great and honest to the Goddess - This is a fucking great time to make some money without putting one dime out to get it.
We all have friends who are on the other side of the fence and are true believers. They honestly believe their candidate is going to win. In spite of evidence that Romney is loosing.
Placing bets when the odds are over 78% in your favor (accurate number just ask me for proof) So you want a road to Trillions?
One great and honest to the Goddess - This is a fucking great time to make some money without putting one dime out to get it.
We all have friends who are on the other side of the fence and are true believers. They honestly believe their candidate is going to win. In spite of evidence that Romney is loosing.
Placing bets when the odds are over 78% in your favor (accurate number just ask me for proof) So you want a road to Trillions?
(Edited 25 seconds later.)
Anonymous W joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 23 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,763
Anonymous O replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #352,799
doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #352,827
can you not vote blank in the us?
Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #352,847
@previous (doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ)
Ballots depending on where you live have one to 4 pages of stuff to vote on. All is optional.
Ballots depending on where you live have one to 4 pages of stuff to vote on. All is optional.
Anonymous Q replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #352,864
@352,756 (A)
> Scarcity is the fundamental economic problem of having humans who have unlimited wants and needs in a world of limited resources.
> Scarcity is the fundamental economic problem of having humans who have unlimited wants and needs in a world of limited resources.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 56 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #352,872
@previous (Q)
Okay stupid: First of all, wants may be unlimited but needs certainly are not; that's the main difference between the two. Needs are quantifiable and have a satiation point, whereas wants do not.
Furthermore, for you to equate everyone being a trillonaire with a depletion of actual physical resources only proves how fucking stupid you actually are. Money is nothing but numbers on paper.
You are seriously arguing that writing bigger numbers on pieces of paper will magically cause the earth's resources to become depleted right now. And that makes you a fucking moron who believes in witchcraft.
Okay stupid: First of all, wants may be unlimited but needs certainly are not; that's the main difference between the two. Needs are quantifiable and have a satiation point, whereas wants do not.
Furthermore, for you to equate everyone being a trillonaire with a depletion of actual physical resources only proves how fucking stupid you actually are. Money is nothing but numbers on paper.
You are seriously arguing that writing bigger numbers on pieces of paper will magically cause the earth's resources to become depleted right now. And that makes you a fucking moron who believes in witchcraft.