Minichan

Topic: Mitt Romney wonders why airplane windows don't open

beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc started this discussion 14 years ago #22,385

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-romney-jet-windows-20120924,0,3749461.story
During a Saturday fundraiser in Beverly Hills, Calif., which took in $6 million, Mitt Romney expressed his concerns over Ann Romney’s emergency landing on Friday. The candidate cast doubt on the mechanical design of airplane windows, in a general sense.

“When you have a fire in an aircraft, there’s no place to go, exactly, there’s no — and you can’t find any oxygen from outside the aircraft to get in the aircraft, because the windows don’t open. I don’t know why they don’t do that. It’s a real problem. So it’s very dangerous....” he said.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 22 minutes later[^] [v] #352,245

/notsurprised

(Edited 1 minute later.)

squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,253

If he spent more time living in the real world and less time inside his rich, mormon bubble, maybe he'd be abke to answer stupid questions.

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,254

Fixed link: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-romney-jet-windows-20120924,0,3749461.story

commas break links

(Edited 26 seconds later.)

Anonymous D double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #352,257

It's a serious issue.

Everyone knows oxygen extinguishes fires.

(Edited 6 seconds later.)

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,260

Good. I'm thrilled that he keeps doing extremely stupid things. People are getting an accurate picture of Republicans with this guy.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 10 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,374

Actually, if you only care about putting out the fire, opening the windows might work. The combination of low oxygen and freezing temperatures at cruising altitude would most likely kill the fire. If your main priority is to keep the passengers alive, though, you'll want to keep those windows closed. Just like fire, people need oxygen and warmth. Of course, if you're already brain dead, oxygen deprivation becomes less of an issue...

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,394

@previous (F)
If you failed to lock yourself in with the seat belt, you could get sucked out into the deep cold blue.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,404

@352,260 (E)
By midterms, nobody will remember and Murika will go back to the same old shit.

postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,469

Actually if the windows only opened when it was safe to, it would probably be good. Let's say there's smoke in the plane, well when the plane lands, it would be perfectly safe to open the windows, and also pretty beneficial.

Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 16 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,471

@352,404 (H)
Maybe, but it's still effective in the short-term.

Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,481

@352,469 (postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
Not a good idea because it would be one more major multiple set of mechanical things that could fail in mid air.

postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ replied with this 14 years ago, 5 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,503

@previous (G)

Life's a gamble, be lucky.

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #352,507

@352,481 (G)
> implying that's not already the reality of air travel.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 18 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,735

@352,394 (G)
I wonder what Mittington's stand is on seat belts?

advi !!3gpAcg/hF joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 22 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #352,739

@previous (K)
Peasant devices for heathens that don't love God enough to be protected by him.
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.