I wasn't trying to make any assumptions about the gender of these people merely giving an example.
Thanks for the spelling lesson, I was trying to look for the correct spelling but I'm obviously retarded. (Please correct headline mods, thanks)
Handle !tYHPZ2dvu6 (OP) double-posted this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,141
Mod abuse, you knew what I ment.
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 37 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,145
Resident furfag here, not into it and couldn't give a shit about it as furfags =/= zoophiles.
But as you said yourself, you're obviously retarded, so it's an easy mistake to make.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,177
@previous (Fox !FXYGNx1XR.)
That'd be an airtight argument but for the fact a zoophile can in fact be a furfag also.
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 13 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,226
@previous (E)
A zoophile can also be any member of any other group, too.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 40 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,227
@352,145 (Fox !FXYGNx1XR.)
Why does this bother you? It's obvious trolling. Why not just ignore it?
(Edited 33 seconds later.)
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,232
@previous (F)
Unsure. Hearing it a thousand times would annoy anyone, but maybe because I already didn't like OP, I may have felt the need to respond.
I'd call him retarded in pretty much any case, not just this.