But then what if someone else didn't want it on? Without a central authority, you'd just constantly have 5 minutes of unbearable heat followed by 5 minutes of subzero temperatures.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 18 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#352,020
@352,011 (C)
Funny thing is you anarchists actually seem to believe this crap. It's your version of the utopia fairy tale.
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#352,022
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#352,028
@previous (A)
Unfair contracts are a statist ideal. Without the state, people would no longer accept this abuse of their liberty.
(Edited 38 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 57 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#352,029
@previous (C)
Then why does the state invalidate contracts that are unfair?
(Edited 8 seconds later.)
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#352,030
@previous (A)
They don't. The state will never approve a contract that limits their power. Therefore, every statist approved contract is inherently an abuse of personal liberty.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 26 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#352,031
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#352,035
@previous (C) > I am butthurt that Statism has embarrassed me and held me back from that sweet loli poon
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#352,036
@previous (D)
Once the state crumbles, I will be able to live with and love my loli girlfriend freely. Statism's arbitrary laws are the only reason we can't be together.
(Edited 39 seconds later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 39 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#352,037
@previous (C)
Thanks for confirming how butthurt you are.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 42 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#352,038
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 53 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#352,039
@352,037 (D)
The statists prohibit adult-loli relationships because they know it is the truest form of liberty, meaning that it is the biggest threat to their power.
Anonymous C double-posted this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#352,040
@352,038 (A)
When the state is removed the parents won't be a problem. My loli will be able to leave them of her own free will.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 29 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#352,041
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#352,042
@previous (D)
lol all you can do is make ad hominem attacks. Just like the state.
doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,055
@352,022 (C)
pretty sure the word bad indicates an opinion mm
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,056
@previous (doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ)
Look dreamworks, I don't want any trouble. I can bamboozle the rest of these idiots easily but you're too clever for me.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 34 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,060
Where do you live that it's so cold that you have to have the heater on?
(Edited 22 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 25 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,082
Okay, they actually just turned it on. Cool.
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
North Dakota.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 21 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,083
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,084
@352,082 (A)
Bullshit. ND is in the low 80s right now.
Southeast MI is colder than that, yet it's still quite comfortable for most people to not need a jacket.
63°F here in Livonia.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,087
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
North Dakota isn't one temperature, idiot.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,088
@previous (A)
I've checked their major cities and none are colder than 72F. Don't lie to me.
(Edited 15 seconds later.)
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,089
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
It was colder this morning.
Anonymous A (OP) double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,090
Now it's too hot in here.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 45 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,091
@352,089 (A)
That is probably true. It was in the mid-40s here and I had to turn on the heater in my car to get rid of the frost on my windshield. Immediately after the windshield became clear, I rolled down the windows and turned my AC to full-blast to get rid of the warm air.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q double-posted this 14 years ago, 27 seconds later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,092
@352,090 (A)
lol
Save money and grief; buy a jacket.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,095
@352,091 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
You're so fucking cool.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,097
</waltergasm>
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 48 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,105
@352,095 (H)
I was, indeed, so fucking cool. And it felt great.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 5 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^][v]#352,159
> The state is bad for society. This is an objective fact.
At the end of the day Anarchists are Luddites. They want to undo a technological advance simply because they're butthurt over it. They're always trying to claim they've lost something to the machine, but can never really give a reason why anyone should give a fuck. It's all very Ted Kaczynski.
It's a sad truth that among anarchists, the argument "If there was no state, we could all rape children" seems to be the best marketing they can think up.
Newsflash: nobody cares. Just like nobody cares when some butthurt shoe making motherfuckers lose their jobs to automation, or when the workers who make iPhone 5 are paid so little they literally have to live at the factory to afford transportation to work the next day. Nobody fucking cares, and that is where you fail.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 13 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#352,261
@previous (B) > At the end of the day Anarchists are Luddites. They want to undo a technological advance simply because they're butthurt over it. They're always trying to claim they've lost something to the machine, but can never really give a reason why anyone should give a fuck. It's all very Ted Kaczynski.
actually, thats just anarcho-primitivists
doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ replied with this 14 years ago, 53 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#352,270
@352,056 (C)
pretty sure you've never won any argument ever mm
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#352,307
@previous (doctor dreamworks md !jdTkvovFCQ)
Anon C cannot possibly be mm
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#352,310