Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#351,660
Never. Not ever!
astromermaid joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 10 hours after the original post[^][v]#351,661
a shirt and underwear
i dont like my boobies exposed.
derpy !hoovesEJmo joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^][v]#351,714
@previous (astromermaid)
This, only sports bra and boyshorts.
Born this Way !dLadyGAgAA joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 day later, 1 day after the original post[^][v]#351,936
@351,661 (astromermaid)
but mark likes them exposed. how do you solve this conflict of interest?
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#351,968
Sleeping in the nude is dangerous and unnatural. It's quite stupid from a Darwinian standpoint to expose body parts which are most sensitive to injury while in a state as vulnerable as sleep.
It's the kind of thing that could get you circumcised.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#351,985
@previous (M)
that's the most paranoid thing i've ever heard
rainbow !dashjGLG/c joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#351,990
How many times have your genitals been attacked in your sleep, and how effective do you suppose pyjama pants would be at stopping a similar attack on your genitals?
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#351,991
@351,985 (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
And yet there are indeed men everywhere who've been circumcised with no memory of the event.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#351,994
@previous (M)
i don't think it's because they slept through it.
Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#351,997
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 47 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#351,999
@351,990 (rainbow !dashjGLG/c)
Probability alone is insufficient for risk assessment. This is why you are all poorfags. You must look at such things in terms of opportunity cost.
You gain absolutely nothing by sleeping naked but you lose an element of protection, and this is why it is fail. You are giving up something beneficial for the privilege of farting shitstreaks on to your sheets. Lame.
Anonymous P replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,000
@previous (M)
this is also a good justification for mormon underwear
rainbow !dashjGLG/c replied with this 14 years ago, 36 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,001
> How effective do you suppose [the element of protection afforded by pyjama pants] would be at stopping a similar attack on your genitals
I fixed my question
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,004
@352,000 (P)
No. Because the protection offered by Mormon underwear is transcendental and therefore cannot be measured by any objective means.
Experiments could be designed to test what I'm talking about.\
Not wearing Mormon underwear requires giving up protection that may or may not exist. Not wearing any underwear means given up protection that can indeed be proven to exist.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous M double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,005
@351,994 (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
Point is it couldn't have happened while they were wearing underwear.
(Edited 1 minute later.)
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,034
@351,985 (squeegee !firstkPE1Q) @351,990 (rainbow !dashjGLG/c)
Naive idiots! Where do you think the reptilians are getting the human skin for their disguises?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,064
@351,968 (M)
That is the dumbest thing ive read in a long time.
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,155
@previous (A)
Is sleep not one of the most vulnerable human states?
Are genitalia not among the most vulnerable human organs?
Logic is dumb now. Congratulations. You're now qualified for a diploma from the average American High School.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,156
@previous (M)
I am already circumcised you retard. The odds of someone breaking into my building, walking up several flights of stairs to my exact room, picking the lock, walking in and cutting my penis are as close to zero as possible. You are literally retarded for thinking it's a problem.
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,160
@previous (A)
John Wayne Bobbit thought the same thing.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,161
@previous (M)
Ok now i know you are literally the dumbest person on the forum.
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,163
@previous (A)
Boo hoo. I'm dumb because I don't subscribe to your reckless sleep habits. Perhaps I should text and drive too. Than I can be real smart like all the other MC users.
Fox !FXYGNx1XR. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,165
Never slept nude, no reason to start now.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 47 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,166
@352,163 (M) > comparing texting and driving to sleeping naked in a locked room
I almost literally spat out my soup. You are so fucking stupid it is funny.
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,168
@previous (A)
Hey if it's funny to you, that proves you're right.
Keep sleeping nude stupid.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,169
@previous (M)
I fucking will, and I'll enjoy it too. Enjoy missing out on the wonder that is sleeping nude because you are so stupid that you think a professional foreskin hunter will come for you.
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,170
@previous (A)
Perhaps if you're weren't sleeping nude I wouldn't have been able to rape you with my big fat troll cock so easily.
lolol motherfucker.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 54 seconds later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,171
@previous (M)
Yes you are clearly just a troll and not a humongous cocksucking idiot. I am totally convinced.
Anonymous M replied with this 14 years ago, 51 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^][v]#352,175