dw !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later[^][v]#349,559
but sabre industries makes electric transmission poles
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 12 minutes after the original post[^][v]#349,562
@previous (dw !jdTkvovFCQ)
They also build these. If they can make a box-rectangle they can make smaller triangles eh?
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 16 minutes after the original post[^][v]#349,563
@previous (C)
They're going to stop making those. Apple's patent covers all rectangular shapes.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 23 minutes after the original post[^][v]#349,565
@349,562 (C)
They're going to stop making those. Apple's patent covers all rectangular shapes.
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 31 minutes after the original post[^][v]#349,569
@previous (D) > Apple's patent covers all rectangular shapes.
Not exactly lololol
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 41 minutes after the original post[^][v]#349,570
@349,563 (A)
Aw, why'd you have your extra post deleted? We had something good going there.
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 13 minutes later, 55 minutes after the original post[^][v]#349,572
@previous (D)
I hate double posting which does happen with glitch's but I suspect OP is a mod with delete powers.
Anyway as a holder of several patents one has to keep in mind how appeal courts deal with this key issue: A Patent has to be novel, non-obvious and useful.
A Rectangle with rounded corners? LoL How many PC's were made as a Rectangle with rounded corners without this issue ever coming up among competitors? How many other cell phones before Apple ever made its first were Rectangles with rounded corners? Ericsson made so many models that way forever so I am looking to place bets on the appeal process laffing this all off.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 43 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#349,579
@previous (C)
The verdict surprised me because I was under the impression that to take someone to court and win, the infringing product had to be close enough in appearance that a reasonable person would mistake it for something else. How can you mistake a Samsung Galaxy SIII for an iPhone when it says SAMSUNG on the front and back of the device? This is like Toyota suing Nissan and winning $1 billion because the Nissan Cube looks kinda sorta like a Scion xB from a distance (and Toyota winning because they patented the idea of boxy cars).
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 18 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#349,583
@349,572 (C)
Yeah, it's Metæ. He can delete his own posts.
Meta !PARAdoxiHw (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#349,585