Topic: Born This Way: Sympathy and Science for Those Who Want to Have Sex with Children
Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #22,031
http://gawker.com/5941037/born-this-way-sympathy-and-science-for-those-who--want-to-have-sex-with-ch
"There doesn't seem to be a pedophilia center in the brain," says Cantor. "Instead, there's either not enough of this cabling, not the correct kind of cabling, or it's wiring the wrong areas together, so instead of the brain evoking protective or parental instincts when these people see children, it's instead evoking sexual instincts. There's almost literally a crossed wiring."
I've thought this for a long time now.
Don't thought patterns influence the brains development though? Couldn't one consciously change this through deliberate thoughts?
Or is that new age nonsense?
"There doesn't seem to be a pedophilia center in the brain," says Cantor. "Instead, there's either not enough of this cabling, not the correct kind of cabling, or it's wiring the wrong areas together, so instead of the brain evoking protective or parental instincts when these people see children, it's instead evoking sexual instincts. There's almost literally a crossed wiring."
I've thought this for a long time now.
Don't thought patterns influence the brains development though? Couldn't one consciously change this through deliberate thoughts?
Or is that new age nonsense?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 18 minutes later[^] [v] #347,880
Simply chop off balls and burn out eyes of people wired that way. Human cockroaches really need to be exterminated.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 24 minutes later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #347,882
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 29 seconds later, 43 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #347,883
> Couldn't one consciously change this through deliberate thoughts?
Pedo scum or not, the brain does not work like that.
Pedo scum or not, the brain does not work like that.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #347,885
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 14 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #347,886
Fuck off mountainman.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #347,892
@OP
> Don't thought patterns influence the brains development though? Couldn't one consciously change this through deliberate thoughts?
Thinking and behavioral patterns do influence brain chemistry, brain development (in certain areas at certain ages, at least), and reinforce which neural connections are formed and strengthened, but this pertains to guiding learning or developmental processes already in progress. It doesn't mean we can rewrite cognitive processes like software to do whatever we wish. Sexual attraction runs pretty deep, and it isn't strictly cognition that is involved. It's tied in with very basic needs and emotional responses to certain stimuli. I don't think you could "train" a pedophile out of their thoughts anymore than you could condition a straight man to stop finding women sexually attractive or "fix" a gay person through therapy.
> Don't thought patterns influence the brains development though? Couldn't one consciously change this through deliberate thoughts?
Thinking and behavioral patterns do influence brain chemistry, brain development (in certain areas at certain ages, at least), and reinforce which neural connections are formed and strengthened, but this pertains to guiding learning or developmental processes already in progress. It doesn't mean we can rewrite cognitive processes like software to do whatever we wish. Sexual attraction runs pretty deep, and it isn't strictly cognition that is involved. It's tied in with very basic needs and emotional responses to certain stimuli. I don't think you could "train" a pedophile out of their thoughts anymore than you could condition a straight man to stop finding women sexually attractive or "fix" a gay person through therapy.
(Edited 3 minutes later.)
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #347,894
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 21 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,897
Nega !34Kas0OdzM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,898
We're still having this thread?
Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,900
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,919
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,920
@347,892 (G)
You might be able to condition them out of it to some degree, but it would largely depend on wether they wanted to change or not. You'd also have to reinforce said conditioning periodically or they'd probably revert eventually.
You might be able to condition them out of it to some degree, but it would largely depend on wether they wanted to change or not. You'd also have to reinforce said conditioning periodically or they'd probably revert eventually.
Anonymous G replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,924
@347,919 (A)
On how cognition affects brain chemistry and growth? It depends on what area you want to know about. The whole field of learning and memory is pretty much centered around the concept. Developmental psychology has a good deal of literature on learning and development. If you are looking specifically for literature on changing habits and behavior, then something like cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is probably a good place to start. There is a good of research on the neural correlates of changes brought about by such therapy, but the literature covers a wide range (OCD, PTSD, phobias, etc.) of disorders. The results might not easily translate from one problem to the other.
I'm not familiar with the research on theraputic approaches to pedophilia, but someone must be working on it somewhere. The current pathology-approach trend seems to treat everything as a medical problem, so a lot of the "treatments" out there right now probably involve administering drugs to decrease sex drive, getting people to stop saying they want to touch children, and calling their treatment a success. A quick Google Scholar search for "CBT pedophilia" turns up a few results that look promising though. There seem to be at least a few people considering the cognitive aspect of it. CBT is often paired with drug trials though, so you might be hard pressed to find figures on the efficacy of therapy sessions alone.
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Yeah, behavioral conditioning has a pretty limited success rate even in things like smoking cessation, even when subjects report that they want to quit. I can't imagine it would be any better with something sexual attraction. Maybe if you could do something wacky, like keep someone in a giant Skinner-box for the rest of their life, you might be able to condition them out of a sexual orientation, but that isn't a terribly realistic scenario. Even then, you would probably only really succeed in getting them to present the behaviors you want rather than actually convincing them to think a different way.
On how cognition affects brain chemistry and growth? It depends on what area you want to know about. The whole field of learning and memory is pretty much centered around the concept. Developmental psychology has a good deal of literature on learning and development. If you are looking specifically for literature on changing habits and behavior, then something like cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is probably a good place to start. There is a good of research on the neural correlates of changes brought about by such therapy, but the literature covers a wide range (OCD, PTSD, phobias, etc.) of disorders. The results might not easily translate from one problem to the other.
I'm not familiar with the research on theraputic approaches to pedophilia, but someone must be working on it somewhere. The current pathology-approach trend seems to treat everything as a medical problem, so a lot of the "treatments" out there right now probably involve administering drugs to decrease sex drive, getting people to stop saying they want to touch children, and calling their treatment a success. A quick Google Scholar search for "CBT pedophilia" turns up a few results that look promising though. There seem to be at least a few people considering the cognitive aspect of it. CBT is often paired with drug trials though, so you might be hard pressed to find figures on the efficacy of therapy sessions alone.
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Yeah, behavioral conditioning has a pretty limited success rate even in things like smoking cessation, even when subjects report that they want to quit. I can't imagine it would be any better with something sexual attraction. Maybe if you could do something wacky, like keep someone in a giant Skinner-box for the rest of their life, you might be able to condition them out of a sexual orientation, but that isn't a terribly realistic scenario. Even then, you would probably only really succeed in getting them to present the behaviors you want rather than actually convincing them to think a different way.
(Edited 8 minutes later.)
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,943
Interesting. Maybe in a few years science will be able to identify pedophiles as children.
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 43 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,958
It's totally bullshit and slanderous to say such things. Pedophilia is normal, it dates back thousands of years. Only today's culture of scapegoating pedophiles and scaremongering makes it a problem.
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,959
Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,960
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 23 seconds later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,961
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,962
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,963
@347,958 (L)
Murder dates back thousands of years. It also used to be okay to beat your wife and kids. Kill them even (abraham didn't see anything wrong with it.)
I suppose we let that stuff slide as well? Nah, thousands of years ago people were slovenly brutes and quite uneducated. Why should we emulate them?
Murder dates back thousands of years. It also used to be okay to beat your wife and kids. Kill them even (abraham didn't see anything wrong with it.)
I suppose we let that stuff slide as well? Nah, thousands of years ago people were slovenly brutes and quite uneducated. Why should we emulate them?
Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,964
@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
I'm not condoning the rape or molestation of kids for a second - that's evil. I just think it's illogical to hate someone based on something they did not choose and cannot control (this is the exact reason sexism, racism, homophobia, etc are unacceptable nowadays). I also genuinely believe the age of consent is far too high, I think 9-years-old would be a more appropriate AoC.
I'm not condoning the rape or molestation of kids for a second - that's evil. I just think it's illogical to hate someone based on something they did not choose and cannot control (this is the exact reason sexism, racism, homophobia, etc are unacceptable nowadays). I also genuinely believe the age of consent is far too high, I think 9-years-old would be a more appropriate AoC.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 26 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,967
@previous (L)
And i think killing idiots should be a justifiable defense in court. Unfortunately most of the rest of the world disagrees.
And i think killing idiots should be a justifiable defense in court. Unfortunately most of the rest of the world disagrees.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,969
@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
On the other hand most of the world agrees al-Qaeda & Taliban members should be killed off. The killing of men attracted to kids, would also do the world a lot of good.
On the other hand most of the world agrees al-Qaeda & Taliban members should be killed off. The killing of men attracted to kids, would also do the world a lot of good.
Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,973
@347,964 (L)
Here is a fair age of consent law.
The age of consent in Minnesota is 16.
If the actor is in a position of authority, the age of consent is 18. If the victim is under the age of 13 the actor must be no more than 36 months older. If the victim is 13, 14 or 15 the actor must be no more than 48 months older.
Here is a fair age of consent law.
The age of consent in Minnesota is 16.
If the actor is in a position of authority, the age of consent is 18. If the victim is under the age of 13 the actor must be no more than 36 months older. If the victim is 13, 14 or 15 the actor must be no more than 48 months older.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 19 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,978
@previous (M)
Are you any of those ages or just way older than?
Why do you care? You see it as baby steps in the direction of legalized pervertry?
Are you any of those ages or just way older than?
Why do you care? You see it as baby steps in the direction of legalized pervertry?
Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,979
@347,967 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)I'm not an idiot dude. I just want to have a consensual, loving relationship with a gay little boy. I would pleasure him in ways you cannot imagine.
@347,973 (M)
I agree it makes more sense than law in the rest of the US, but it's still unfair. I prefer Mexico's age of consent myself.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,980
Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,981
@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
I'm sorry if I offend you, I really am. It wasn't my choice to be this way and given the chance to be a normal, heterosexual guy I would take it immediately. :/
I'm sorry if I offend you, I really am. It wasn't my choice to be this way and given the chance to be a normal, heterosexual guy I would take it immediately. :/
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,983
@347,978 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
> Are you any of those ages or just way older than?
I am almost 18.
> Why do you care?
My cousin was nearly put on the sex offender registry for sex with a minor (both were below the AoC at the time).
> You see it as baby steps in the direction of legalized pervertry?
I see it as legalized teenage behavior. We still drink, fuck, smoke and gamble, even if it's "illegal" (if you get caught) for us to do so. Why should we be punished by the law just for being "too young"? And how can we be considered "too young" if we can be tried as an adult?
> Are you any of those ages or just way older than?
I am almost 18.
> Why do you care?
My cousin was nearly put on the sex offender registry for sex with a minor (both were below the AoC at the time).
> You see it as baby steps in the direction of legalized pervertry?
I see it as legalized teenage behavior. We still drink, fuck, smoke and gamble, even if it's "illegal" (if you get caught) for us to do so. Why should we be punished by the law just for being "too young"? And how can we be considered "too young" if we can be tried as an adult?
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q double-posted this 14 years ago, 35 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,984
Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,985
@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Some children enjoy it. They shouldn't be depraved of free will based on their age.
Some children enjoy it. They shouldn't be depraved of free will based on their age.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 57 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,986
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,987
@347,985 (L)
So its ok with you if a serial killer comes after you to get his rocks off. Why deprive them of free will?
So its ok with you if a serial killer comes after you to get his rocks off. Why deprive them of free will?
Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,989
@347,986 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
I'm not necessarily talking about penetrating the child, Walter. The child should always come first. (No... Not literally.)
@previous (B)
Totally different situation. I don't think there's anyone sane that would defend murderers.
I'm not necessarily talking about penetrating the child, Walter. The child should always come first. (No... Not literally.)
@previous (B)
Totally different situation. I don't think there's anyone sane that would defend murderers.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,991
@previous (L)
> I'm not necessarily talking about penetrating the child, Walter. The child should always come first. (No... Not literally.)
LEGALIZE STATE LOLIS GARY JOHNSON 2012
> Totally different situation. I don't think there's anyone sane that would defend murderers.
It's easy to defend a murderer if they killed a human scum, like how Varg stabbed a sociopathic communist in the head for conspiring to torture and then murder him.
> I'm not necessarily talking about penetrating the child, Walter. The child should always come first. (No... Not literally.)
LEGALIZE STATE LOLIS GARY JOHNSON 2012
> Totally different situation. I don't think there's anyone sane that would defend murderers.
It's easy to defend a murderer if they killed a human scum, like how Varg stabbed a sociopathic communist in the head for conspiring to torture and then murder him.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 41 seconds later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,992
@347,989 (L)
I didn't think any sane person would defend a kiddie molester, yet you do and admit you are one.
I didn't think any sane person would defend a kiddie molester, yet you do and admit you are one.
Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,994
@previous (B)
Again, I'm not defending molesters. Child molesting is something that happens without consent. I would never fuck a child without his consent, that's just wrong.
Again, I'm not defending molesters. Child molesting is something that happens without consent. I would never fuck a child without his consent, that's just wrong.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #347,996
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,002
@347,994 (L)
Why do you continue to argue that a 3 year old kiddy is old enough to give you consent?
Why do you continue to argue that a 3 year old kiddy is old enough to give you consent?
Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,003
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,004
@previous (L)
Oh I see 3 is to young and the brains of 8 or 9 years old kiddies is developed enough for your demented needs. The logic of child molesters is what it is.
Oh I see 3 is to young and the brains of 8 or 9 years old kiddies is developed enough for your demented needs. The logic of child molesters is what it is.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,005
I know some 8 - 9 year olds. They're too dumb to consent to a glass of coke without their mothers permission. Kids can't do anything without their parents consent. Why should being raped be the exception?
Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,008
@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
I don't know what kind of shitty schooling system you have over there but I know a very intelligent 8-year-old who is perfectly capable of deciding what he wants.
I don't know what kind of shitty schooling system you have over there but I know a very intelligent 8-year-old who is perfectly capable of deciding what he wants.
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,010
@previous (L)
Except deciding on having "extra protein" added to his milk, apparently.
Except deciding on having "extra protein" added to his milk, apparently.
(Edited 6 minutes later.)
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 8 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,011
@348,008 (L)
> I don't know what kind of shitty schooling system you have over there but I know a very intelligent 8-year-old who is perfectly capable of deciding what he wants.
You are not intelligent enough to make that decision. All you care about is sex with a kiddy.
> I don't know what kind of shitty schooling system you have over there but I know a very intelligent 8-year-old who is perfectly capable of deciding what he wants.
You are not intelligent enough to make that decision. All you care about is sex with a kiddy.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,012
@348,008 (L)
> wants to be a zebra
> eats boogers
> watches sponge bob
Quality decision making there, friend.
> wants to be a zebra
> eats boogers
> watches sponge bob
Quality decision making there, friend.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,015
Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,017
@348,011 (B)
Not true, I also think child pornography should be legalized.
@348,012 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
Funny...
Not true, I also think child pornography should be legalized.
@348,012 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
Funny...
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 59 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,018
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,019
Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,020
@348,018 (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
Fine. I'm not modifying it either, saving for an M5.
@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
It might be true, and that's fine. You have to understand I'm not saying we should go and pester children for sex, constantly asking them, bribing them or blackmailing them. There's a time and a place for it. Not every 8-year-old is ready.
Fine. I'm not modifying it either, saving for an M5.
@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
It might be true, and that's fine. You have to understand I'm not saying we should go and pester children for sex, constantly asking them, bribing them or blackmailing them. There's a time and a place for it. Not every 8-year-old is ready.
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,021
Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,022
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 18 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,025
@348,020 (L)
> I'm not saying we should go and pester children for sex, constantly asking them, bribing them or blackmailing them. There's a time and a place for it. Not every 8-year-old is ready to be asked, bribed and blackmailed into having sex all the time.
Fixed for accuracy.
> I'm not saying we should go and pester children for sex, constantly asking them, bribing them or blackmailing them. There's a time and a place for it. Not every 8-year-old is ready to be asked, bribed and blackmailed into having sex all the time.
Fixed for accuracy.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 25 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,026
squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,035
Then why did you imply that? and why did you say
@347,989 (L)
"I'm not necessarily talking about penetrating the child"
@347,979 (L)
immediately following this (a cartoon of an adult penetrating a child.)
it doesn't add up. you can't say you didn't say or mean stuff when you obviously say and mean it.
we're not talking. scroll up. there's a record.
@347,989 (L)
"I'm not necessarily talking about penetrating the child"
@347,979 (L)
immediately following this (a cartoon of an adult penetrating a child.)
it doesn't add up. you can't say you didn't say or mean stuff when you obviously say and mean it.
we're not talking. scroll up. there's a record.
(Edited 57 seconds later.)
Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 19 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,040
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,042
@previous (L)
maybe amongst hardcore pedophiles.
but even surgeons laugh at jokes most people would find ghastly. i guess it's a matter of desensitization.
maybe amongst hardcore pedophiles.
but even surgeons laugh at jokes most people would find ghastly. i guess it's a matter of desensitization.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,062
Squeegee are you a virgin?
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #348,063
Born this Way !dLadyGAgAA joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #348,084
Can somebody tell me if this topic is about me?
Falco !VYDDrUD3gc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #348,085
@previous (Born this Way !dLadyGAgAA)
It's not. Really, it's not about anything at all as far as I'm concerned.
It's not. Really, it's not about anything at all as far as I'm concerned.
Born this Way !dLadyGAgAA replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #348,087
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #348,110
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #348,160
@previous (A)
a lot of the time i'd be way more drunk than her, so it's possible i was being taken advantage of. sure, maybe a few times.
a lot of the time i'd be way more drunk than her, so it's possible i was being taken advantage of. sure, maybe a few times.
Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #348,212
@347,983 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
you don't drink fuck smoke or gamble because you're a nerd you just read eat stroke and babble ohh
you don't drink fuck smoke or gamble because you're a nerd you just read eat stroke and babble ohh
Anonymous Q double-posted this 14 years ago, 59 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #348,213
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #348,217
Anonymous Q replied with this 14 years ago, 8 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #348,347
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #348,351
Anonymous Q replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #348,352
Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 9 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #348,385
> Further hindering America's progress are our "mandatory report" laws, some of which say that therapists are required to contact authorities if they have even a "reasonable suspicion" that a child is being mistreated somewhere
I would really like to know how these laws are "hindering progress".
I would really like to know how these laws are "hindering progress".
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #348,387
> Gawker
Surprised nobody has made this point yet.
Surprised nobody has made this point yet.
Nega !34Kas0OdzM replied with this 14 years ago, 20 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #348,633
@347,900 (F)
> You're still alive?
The henchmen you sent for me made the fatal mistake of of shooting my dog.
I HATE people who hurt animals for no reason.
> You're still alive?
The henchmen you sent for me made the fatal mistake of of shooting my dog.
I HATE people who hurt animals for no reason.