Minichan

Topic: Federal court blocks Texas Voter ID law, citing racial impact

beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc started this discussion 14 years ago #21,848

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/31/us/court-blocks-tough-voter-id-law-in-texas.html
A federal court on Thursday blocked Texas from enforcing a strict new voter identification law, ruling that the state had failed to prove that the mandate would not disproportionately suppress turnout among eligible voters who are members of minority groups.

“The State of Texas enacted a voter ID law that — at least to our knowledge — is the most stringent in the country,” the court wrote. “That law will almost certainly have retrogressive effect: it imposes strict, unforgiving burdens on the poor, and racial minorities in Texas are disproportionately likely to live in poverty.”

The 56-page ruling came days after another three-judge panel in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the Texas Legislature had intentionally discriminated against Hispanic voters in drawing up new political maps for Congressional and legislative districts, citing the same section of the Voting Rights Act.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later[^] [v] #345,877

In Florida, the Repubs have already blocked many minorities from voting. Is that what Jesus would do?

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #345,879

inb4 butthurt supporting voter disenfranchisement

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 seconds later, 4 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #345,880

lolrepublicans

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 29 minutes later, 34 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #345,895

As of today. Obama is only up by 1.1 points of Romney (average of 12 polls)

Electoral college count has a higher spread 221 Obama/Biden vs Romney/Ryan 191 with Toss Ups 126

So Republicans will do everything they can to get an edge.

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #345,920

Why should those who won't provide an ID be allowed to vote? They are too much of a failure at life to decide the fate of the nation.

Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #345,933

@previous (F)
lrn2 history and Jim Crowe, bud

http://felonvoting.procon.org/view.answers.php?questionID=000649

(Edited 2 minutes later.)

Anonymous F replied with this 14 years ago, 28 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #345,944

@previous (C)
Felons should be allowed to vote, so long as they bring a photo ID.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 12 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #345,951

I don't understand. What ID do you have to show currently?

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #346,116

> requires voters who show up at the polls to identify themselves with one of five forms of ID

Five forms of ID? Why would that possibly be needed?

dw !jdTkvovFCQ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #346,140

@previous (H)
One of five

I don't really see the problem with having to ID for voting but apparently not everyone has an ID in the US

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 hours after the original post[^] [v] #346,141

@346,116 (H)
That would be quite funny.

squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #346,171

@346,140 (dw !jdTkvovFCQ)
Poor people can't afford to pay for it, or even pay to take a cab to the Department to get one. It's actually a problem here, the state doesn't give out free IDs and public transportation is a joke in most cities, especially if you're stuck in a suburb with zero public transport.

Same reason poor people can't find jobs, there aren't any in their neighbors and getting to work in another community costs more than they can afford anyway.

Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #346,172

@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
Fed court cited one example of $250 transportation cost to get the ID and there is a charge for the card - If my memory is correct I think it was $22.
US Super court will come down hard on this case.

dw !jdTkvovFCQ replied with this 14 years ago, 23 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #346,173

@346,171 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
how much are ids over there?

squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 9 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #346,174

@previous (dw !jdTkvovFCQ)
Idk, a renewal is like $8-12 or something, i think a first id is $20 or $30, can't recall. It's not expensive, but if you're poor even that can be a burden.

Getting there is the biggest problem for most people who don't have one.

Oh, and if you have tickets then you can't renew it, so if you have too many fines to pay then you can't vote. It's just silly.

Also the kind of voter fraud that an ID is meant to stop is only happens a few dozen times per election. It's not even in the hundreds. The bigger problem is disenfranchised voters who are turned away at the polls illegally.

I'll try to find the NPR podcast where the statistics were discussed. It made me sick. Literally only a few dozen cases, so let's disenfranchise thousands to prevent it!

(Edited 40 seconds later.)

dw !jdTkvovFCQ replied with this 14 years ago, 31 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #346,177

@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc) oh thats not a lot, i had to pay like 70 euro it is free if your under 14 or so

I ♥ Indy™ !THANKS5vxA joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #346,483

Good, that was the right decision. Voter ID programs are nothing but segregation programs, run by rich, white, old men.

Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 1 day later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #346,776

@previous (I ♥ Indy™ !THANKS5vxA)
> says the racist pedo

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 15 minutes later, 4 days after the original post[^] [v] #346,777

@346,483 (I ♥ Indy™ !THANKS5vxA)
Like Marsden?
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.