Topic: Why did so many people die in the WTC South Tower?
Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #21,618
Why weren't they evacuated after the North Tower got struck?
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #343,095
IIRC It's because the first plane was originally thought to be just an accident and also the buildings were built to withstand a hit from a plane anyway.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #343,099
What happened to WTC7?
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 9 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #343,100
Because chaos and confusion, and the second plane hit very soon afterwards. Hell, the elevator alone is a 10-15 minute ride top to bottom with stops on all floors.
Basically it was a worst nightmare scenario and anyone who survived was damn lucky.
Basically it was a worst nightmare scenario and anyone who survived was damn lucky.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 14 years ago, 15 minutes later, 24 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #343,104
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 29 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #343,107
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 20 minutes later, 50 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #343,117
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 33 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #343,132
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #343,134
@previous (E)
> Standing next to the two largest skyskrapers in america
> both collapse into free fall and crash into the groud in the worst disaster any skyscraper has suffered
> expect no collateral damage.
I'm suprised the collapse of wtc1 and wtc2 didn't knock down more buildings. That was a lot of energy crashing down.
My friend who lives in soho area said she thought it was an earthquake.
> Standing next to the two largest skyskrapers in america
> both collapse into free fall and crash into the groud in the worst disaster any skyscraper has suffered
> expect no collateral damage.
I'm suprised the collapse of wtc1 and wtc2 didn't knock down more buildings. That was a lot of energy crashing down.
My friend who lives in soho area said she thought it was an earthquake.
Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #343,135
@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
First of all the official account says that building collapsed due to a fire. There is no evidence to support that claim. You can see how the building just fucking collapses exactly in on itself while the surrounding buildings are unaffected.
First of all the official account says that building collapsed due to a fire. There is no evidence to support that claim. You can see how the building just fucking collapses exactly in on itself while the surrounding buildings are unaffected.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #343,138
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #343,141
@343,134 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
> My friend who lives in soho area said she thought it was an earthquake.
Jesus Christ... Was he not listening to the radio or TV? Did he not know wtf was going on???
> My friend who lives in soho area said she thought it was an earthquake.
Jesus Christ... Was he not listening to the radio or TV? Did he not know wtf was going on???
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #343,142
@previous (G)
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)P
Many Christians believe it was part of Gods plan.
(Citing a deleted or non-existent reply.)P
Many Christians believe it was part of Gods plan.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 35 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #343,159
@343,141 (G)
She was sleeping. She went to new york college or whatever. It woke her up. Originally she was from San fran and thought it was a quake.
@343,135 (E)
Obviously the answer is conspiracy theory cruise missile then.
She was sleeping. She went to new york college or whatever. It woke her up. Originally she was from San fran and thought it was a quake.
@343,135 (E)
Obviously the answer is conspiracy theory cruise missile then.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #343,209
@343,135 (E)> There is no evidence to support that claim.
Do you mean except for all the evidence that supports that claim
Handel !tYHPZ2dvu6 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 56 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #343,226
@343,132 (E)
It's a conspiracy man I know it, you know it.
@343,134 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
Ya and observe how both towers free falled perfectly, like a controlled explosion.
Please tell me, have you ever seen or heard of a building that collapses like it was a controlled explosion except it wasn't?
Open your eyes America, it doesn't fucking add up.
It's a conspiracy man I know it, you know it.
@343,134 (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
Ya and observe how both towers free falled perfectly, like a controlled explosion.
Please tell me, have you ever seen or heard of a building that collapses like it was a controlled explosion except it wasn't?
Open your eyes America, it doesn't fucking add up.
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 12 hours later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #343,302
> Train and arm freedomfighters in Afghanistan to fight the Russians.> Fight the freedomfighters as terrorists decades later.
mfw
Anonymous K double-posted this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #343,303
Hillary Clinton went on record and said:
> While at the same time realizing that there’s a lot of other moving parts to this. And the United States, to some extent, has to acknowledge, being among the creators of the problem we are now dealing with. It seemed like a great idea, back in the ’80s to– embolden– and train and equip– Taliban, mujahidin, jihadists against the Soviet Union, which had invaded Afghanistan. And with our help, and with the Pakistani support– this group– including, at that time, Bin Laden, defeated the Soviet Union. Drove them out of Afghanistan, eventually. Saw the fall of the government that they had installed. And the rest we know. They eventually took over. But when we accomplished our primary mission of seeing the Soviet Union thrown out of Afghanistan, we withdrew. And we left the problems of a well-equipped, fundamentalist, ideological and religious group that had been battle hardened to the Afghans and the Pakistanis.
> While at the same time realizing that there’s a lot of other moving parts to this. And the United States, to some extent, has to acknowledge, being among the creators of the problem we are now dealing with. It seemed like a great idea, back in the ’80s to– embolden– and train and equip– Taliban, mujahidin, jihadists against the Soviet Union, which had invaded Afghanistan. And with our help, and with the Pakistani support– this group– including, at that time, Bin Laden, defeated the Soviet Union. Drove them out of Afghanistan, eventually. Saw the fall of the government that they had installed. And the rest we know. They eventually took over. But when we accomplished our primary mission of seeing the Soviet Union thrown out of Afghanistan, we withdrew. And we left the problems of a well-equipped, fundamentalist, ideological and religious group that had been battle hardened to the Afghans and the Pakistanis.
Anonymous K triple-posted this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #343,304
> In the 1980s, the CIA provided some $5 billion in military aid for Islamic fundamentalist rebels fighting the Soviet occupation in Afghanistan, but scaled down operations after Moscow pulled out in 1989. However, Selig Harrison of the DC-based Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars recently told a conference in London that the CIA created the Taliban “monster†by providing some $3 billion for the ultra-fundamentalist militia in their 1994-6 drive to power.
Times of India, March 7, 2001
Times of India, March 7, 2001
Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #343,307
Anonymous L double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 17 hours after the original post[^] [v] #343,309
@343,226 (Handel !tYHPZ2dvu6)
> Ya and observe how both towers free falled perfectly, like a controlled explosion.
See: http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm
> Ya and observe how both towers free falled perfectly, like a controlled explosion.
See: http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #343,356
If there are terrorists working to bring down the towers, don't you think they wouldn't hesitate to bring down WTC 7 as well? It was much too low to the ground to ram a hijacked plane into it, so they could've used a coordinated detonation system to bring WTC7 down. After all, a conspiracy of this magnitude would have backup plans to offset the chance of failure. And yes, the 9/11 attack was a conspiracy, and not in the tin-foil GUBMENT DID IT way.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 22 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #343,358
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 21 hours after the original post[^] [v] #343,359
@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
About as discreet as hijacking a plane in mid-air to ram it into the WTC building. This event probably took YEARS of planning.
About as discreet as hijacking a plane in mid-air to ram it into the WTC building. This event probably took YEARS of planning.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #343,414
@previous (A)
But the amount of explosives needed to implode a building is measured in tons. You'd need to pack tons of explosives around support columns to bring it down. Otherwise it just explodes out.
Havent you ever seen them prep a building on tv for an implosion? Even the 1 ton truck bomb used in the OK city bombing couldn't bring down a building that size.
The logistics are too far fetched, and make hijacking a plane with a box cutter seem like a cake walk. That takes all of 15 minutes to execute, but rigging buildings to implode takes moths of prep work and includes many dozens of people.
But the amount of explosives needed to implode a building is measured in tons. You'd need to pack tons of explosives around support columns to bring it down. Otherwise it just explodes out.
Havent you ever seen them prep a building on tv for an implosion? Even the 1 ton truck bomb used in the OK city bombing couldn't bring down a building that size.
The logistics are too far fetched, and make hijacking a plane with a box cutter seem like a cake walk. That takes all of 15 minutes to execute, but rigging buildings to implode takes moths of prep work and includes many dozens of people.
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 23 hours after the original post[^] [v] #343,416
@previous (squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc)
Of course collapsing two of tge worlds tallest buildings next to it probably just blew out the foundation of the whole area.
It's why the while thing became a giant pit for so long, everything under the ground was trashed
Of course collapsing two of tge worlds tallest buildings next to it probably just blew out the foundation of the whole area.
It's why the while thing became a giant pit for so long, everything under the ground was trashed