Topic: abolish rape laws!
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc started this discussion 14 years ago #21,560
Rape causes no harm! Did you know that women's bodies have ways of preventing pregnancy in case of rape?
That's right! Where's the harm?
Sex is enjoyable and pleasurable. Rape is practically a gift! Just enjoy it, girls. But not too much or your natural defense will think it's not rape and you can get pregnant.
That's right! Where's the harm?
Sex is enjoyable and pleasurable. Rape is practically a gift! Just enjoy it, girls. But not too much or your natural defense will think it's not rape and you can get pregnant.
(Edited 36 seconds later.)
squeegee !hbZVTk6JYc (OP) double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 minute later[^] [v] #342,570
Of course if you enjoy it enough to get pregnant then you get what's coming to you.
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #342,571
@OP
> Rape causes no harm! Did you know that women's bodies have ways of preventing pregnancy in case of rape?
>
> That's right! Where's the harm?
>
> Sex is enjoyable and pleasurable. Rape is practically a gift! Just enjoy it, girls. But not too much or your natural defense will think it's not rape and you can get pregnant.
Have you just once considered how your own ass is available territory to Republicans for rape.
> Rape causes no harm! Did you know that women's bodies have ways of preventing pregnancy in case of rape?
>
> That's right! Where's the harm?
>
> Sex is enjoyable and pleasurable. Rape is practically a gift! Just enjoy it, girls. But not too much or your natural defense will think it's not rape and you can get pregnant.
Have you just once considered how your own ass is available territory to Republicans for rape.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 7 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #342,572
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 11 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #342,575
Cathy !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 38 minutes later, 49 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #342,576
So what if I got raped?
Handel !tYHPZ2dvu6 joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #342,578
squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 45 seconds later, 55 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #342,579
@previous (Handel !tYHPZ2dvu6)
...well, that is the official GOP position on the matter.
way better than the liberals, always trying to turn people into victims.
...well, that is the official GOP position on the matter.
way better than the liberals, always trying to turn people into victims.
(Edited 54 seconds later.)
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #342,580
I agree with the OP completely. I mean, they have Nazi science on their side. And if Nazi science isn't definite proof of something, then nothing is.Cathy !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #342,582
Handel !tYHPZ2dvu6 replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #342,584
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #342,585
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 43 seconds later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #342,586
@342,582 (Cathy !TGirlYJKXM)
butt you said you maybe wanted to be a woman and you have few options on where the guy is going to stick it to you. Hurt may be your only option.
butt you said you maybe wanted to be a woman and you have few options on where the guy is going to stick it to you. Hurt may be your only option.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,641
It's not illegal because of harm. It's illegal because it violates one's property rights over one's own body.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,643
@previous (H)
> It's not illegal because of harm. It's illegal because it violates one's property rights over one's own body.
Republicans do not agree with
> property rights over one's own body.
> It's not illegal because of harm. It's illegal because it violates one's property rights over one's own body.
Republicans do not agree with
> property rights over one's own body.
Cathy !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,644
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,645
@previous (Cathy !TGirlYJKXM)
Not exactly but they sure are happy to make you pay more as percentage in tax's. More Bondage then slavery.
Not exactly but they sure are happy to make you pay more as percentage in tax's. More Bondage then slavery.
Cathy !TGirlYJKXM replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,646
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 54 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,650
@previous (Cathy !TGirlYJKXM)
Multiple forms of incarceration. Far to many live lives in a home made prison.
Multiple forms of incarceration. Far to many live lives in a home made prison.
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,654
@342,641 (H)
Fuck off, mountainman. Nobody cares about how you define anything.
gb2 your libertarian circlejerk
Fuck off, mountainman. Nobody cares about how you define anything.
gb2 your libertarian circlejerk
beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,670
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 34 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,672
Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,680
@342,654 (C)
Great post.
@342,670 (beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc)
Great post.
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
No dichotomy; something can violate property rights and cause physical harm. No ad hominem.
Great post.
@342,670 (beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc)
Great post.
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
No dichotomy; something can violate property rights and cause physical harm. No ad hominem.
(Edited 2 minutes later.)
beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc replied with this 14 years ago, 50 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,683
@previous (H)
> something can be violate property rights and cause physical harm
> can be violate
> claim not to be a retard
> something can be violate property rights and cause physical harm
> can be violate
> claim not to be a retard
Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,685
beckyderp !CaTLdYmooc replied with this 14 years ago, 41 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,686
Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 36 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,687
Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx replied with this 14 years ago, 29 seconds later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,688
Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 14 hours after the original post[^] [v] #342,689
@previous (Killer Lettuce !!iNo3FkiZx)
This is incorrect. In fact, argumentation per se contradicts statism.
This is incorrect. In fact, argumentation per se contradicts statism.