Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later[^][v]#339,299
Only proves that whatever God thing they pray to ain't worth shit.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 42 seconds later, 3 minutes after the original post[^][v]#339,300
No half brained white supremacist gunman is going to confuse Sikhs with Islam. Sikhism is actually very peaceful and in line with Western values, there are no Sikh terrorists, it's like the opposite of Islam.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 10 minutes after the original post[^][v]#339,303
@previous (C) > half brained white supremacist gunman
They be White inbreeds.
"Sikh is defined as "any human being who faithfully believes in One Immortal Being; ten Gurus, from Guru Nanak Dev to Sri Guru Gobind Singh; Sri Guru Granth Sahib; the teachings of the ten Gurus and the baptism bequeathed by the tenth Guru; and who does not owe allegiance to any other religion".[26] Sikhs believe in the equality of humankind, the concept of universal brotherhood of man and One Supreme God (Ik Onkar)."
Ik Onkar Failed to deliver.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 18 minutes after the original post[^][v]#339,307
@339,300 (C)
Sikhs have been killed before due to being mistaken for Muslims, because of their religious headwear. White supremacist gunmen aren't exactly the most intelligent people on Earth, evidently.
Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 22 minutes after the original post[^][v]#339,311
@previous (D)
They need not be intelligent. NRA protects them.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 17 minutes later, 40 minutes after the original post[^][v]#339,321
i saw a sikh yesterday and thought about situations like in the op
RIP
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 46 minutes after the original post[^][v]#339,323
@339,307 (D)
If the gunman was a white supremacist then being Sikh would be enough justification.
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 54 minutes after the original post[^][v]#339,328
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#339,354
The bigger question. What's God's problem with hair anyways?
Kathryn !TGirlYJKXM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#339,355
Damn, I didn't see this.
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 26 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^][v]#339,359
@339,354 (G)
The problem isn't hair, that's just an excuse. If I were omnipotent, the first thing I would do is make people wear stupid hats all the time. It is practically a cultural universal that the history of religion and the history of silly headgear goes hand-in-hand. The more pious, or devoted, or important a person wants to appear, the sillier the hat.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 4 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^][v]#339,401