Topic: Former NFL Cheerleader Sarah Jones Denies She Is the 'Female Sandusky'
squeegee !firstkPE1Q started this discussion 14 years ago #21,143
http://gma.yahoo.com/former-nfl-cheerleader-sarah-jones-denies-she-female-060505282--abc-news-topstories.html> Last November, the then 26-year-old teacher and former Bengal's Cheerleader was accused of having sex with a 17-year-old student at Dixie Heights High School,.
> "I think people are taking this whole student-teacher thing… Yes, he was a student but he was not my student," said Jones. "He was a family friend and I am very close to his parents. Had it not been for their support it would be very difficult to get through this without them."
case dismissed
HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later[^] [v] #338,367
That's illegal only because she's an "authority figure".
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 12 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,368
http://abcnews.go.com/US/nfl-cheerleader-sarah-jones-denies-female-sandusky/story?id=16892271
Yahoo link is dead as fuck at momento.
Reading more current info - Seems the lawn is trying to limit her freedom of speek.
Yahoo link is dead as fuck at momento.
Reading more current info - Seems the lawn is trying to limit her freedom of speek.
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,370
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 32 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,371
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,377
> 17
that is so fine
that is so fine
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,397
Age of consent is 16 in Kentucky. However, age of consent is 18 if one is an authority figure and the two people know each other because one of them is an authority figure. So I guess her defense is that they came into contact because she is/was a friend of his family.
squeegee joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 26 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,403
Her tits are too fantastic to incarcerate
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 15 hours later, 22 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,503
But she doesn't have a penis. How can she be guilty of anything?
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 day later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #338,844
her affair with a seventeen year old was inappropriate and illegal , but cannot be compared to years of sexual relations with very young boys.
Anonymous J double-posted this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #338,846
Anonymous I replied with this 14 years ago, 9 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #338,872
@previous (J)
Exactly my point. If we're going to have selective enforcement of the law then equality and rule of law are a fucking joke. We should at least be honest with ourselves and write laws that apply only to persons with penises.
Exactly my point. If we're going to have selective enforcement of the law then equality and rule of law are a fucking joke. We should at least be honest with ourselves and write laws that apply only to persons with penises.
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 10 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #339,062
@previous (I)
No, he had sex with children, and many were unwilling. She had consensual sex with a seventeen year old.
No, he had sex with children, and many were unwilling. She had consensual sex with a seventeen year old.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 20 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #339,063
@previous (J)
yeah, and also, this isn't about statutory rape or pedophilia. the relationship was actual quite legal, except for the fact that she may be considered an authority figure in this case. if not, case dismissed.
yeah, and also, this isn't about statutory rape or pedophilia. the relationship was actual quite legal, except for the fact that she may be considered an authority figure in this case. if not, case dismissed.
(Edited 20 seconds later.)
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #339,073
@previous (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
exactly, but to anon I a 17 year old boy is just the same as a small child.
exactly, but to anon I a 17 year old boy is just the same as a small child.