Topic: why aren't ultrasound images considered CP?
squeegee started this discussion 14 years ago #21,118
Is it because a fetus isn't a person?
postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later[^] [v] #338,052
You can have images of naked children, and it not be considered CP. I'll send you some links if you'd like.
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 17 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #338,057
sup to4s… oh
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 19 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #338,060
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 28 minutes later, 48 minutes after the original post[^] [v] #338,076
'sup tgcomix?
postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #338,100
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #338,101
@previous (postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+)
How many sources of naked children images do you have at the ready?
How many sources of naked children images do you have at the ready?
postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #338,102
@previous (D)
I used to have a lot more because I browsed anontalk when it was around. But now I have like one.
I used to have a lot more because I browsed anontalk when it was around. But now I have like one.
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #338,103
postmortem !!Qe8ScDbX+ replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #338,105
@previous (D)
it isn't CP though. I like to send it to friends to make them worried about going to jail. Because I'm a great friend.
it isn't CP though. I like to send it to friends to make them worried about going to jail. Because I'm a great friend.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 26 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #338,121
this thread went exactly as expected
squeegee !firstkPE1Q double-posted this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,142
Ah, legal precedent as seen by the state of Colorado in the Aurora movie theater shooting:
> Pregnant survivor Ashley Moser suffered a miscarriage following the shooting, but the loss of her fetus did not alter the number of murder charges
> because the unborn cannot be counted as homicide victims under Colorado law .
> Moser, 25, was left paralyzed from the waist down from her own bullet wounds. Her daughter, 6-year-old Veronica Moser-Sullivan, was the youngest of
> those who died in the shooting.
see? not a person.
> Pregnant survivor Ashley Moser suffered a miscarriage following the shooting, but the loss of her fetus did not alter the number of murder charges
> because the unborn cannot be counted as homicide victims under Colorado law .
> Moser, 25, was left paralyzed from the waist down from her own bullet wounds. Her daughter, 6-year-old Veronica Moser-Sullivan, was the youngest of
> those who died in the shooting.
see? not a person.
(Edited 31 seconds later.)
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,143
@previous (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
Simple
Sperm = not a person
Egg = not a person
Sperm connects with egg = not a person
Bake 9 months = a person
Anything less is underdone.
Simple
Sperm = not a person
Egg = not a person
Sperm connects with egg = not a person
Bake 9 months = a person
Anything less is underdone.
Anonymous C replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,164
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 41 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,175
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,178
@previous (I)
yeah, people really ought to do a google search before naming a child. but, also, you gotta admit, it's a pretty obscure name.
yeah, people really ought to do a google search before naming a child. but, also, you gotta admit, it's a pretty obscure name.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 7 hours later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,261
What's wrong with calling her daughter Veronica Moser?
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 12 minutes later, 12 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,263
Anonymous J replied with this 14 years ago, 29 minutes later, 13 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,266
Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,307
Anonymous D replied with this 14 years ago, 27 minutes later, 15 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,311
The Truth !XRJSgJUbuM joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 18 hours after the original post[^] [v] #338,340
No, a taste test.