Notice: You have been identified as a bot, so no internal UID will be assigned to you. If you are a real person messing with your useragent, you should change it back to something normal.

Minichan

Topic: What is a perfect room temperature for you?

Anonymous A started this discussion 14 years ago #21,016

The body can not be blank.
Poll option Votes Percentage Graph
Baking in an oven is alright with me - 0%
90-99 1 8%
80-89 - 0%
70-79 5 42%
60-69 4 33%
50-59 1 8%
40-49 - 0%
30-39 - 0%
Water freezes in my room 1 8%

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later[^] [v] #337,098

296.15 °K

Alcoholic Green !OAFoAfh8j. joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 1 hour after the original post[^] [v] #337,101

Why would anyone wants to be at 99°C?

HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 1 hour later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #337,107

45-55 is ideal.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 16 minutes later, 3 hours after the original post[^] [v] #337,109

@previous (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
> Walter
> Opinion

squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 56 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #337,123

leave it to a spoiled fat american child to complain about modern conveniences like air conditioners.
you're so fucking lucky you happened to be born the the last 50 years of the universe in which air conditioners happen to have been invented.

Alcoholic Green !OAFoAfh8j. replied with this 14 years ago, 29 minutes later, 4 hours after the original post[^] [v] #337,127

@337,107 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)

Anything above 15 is way too hot.

HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q replied with this 14 years ago, 59 minutes later, 5 hours after the original post[^] [v] #337,132

@337,109 (E)
'sup reid
@337,123 (squeegee !firstkPE1Q)
If not for air conditioning, I'd probably have been born in Northern Europe instead of the upper midwest.
@previous (Alcoholic Green !OAFoAfh8j.)
45-55 is in American units. Which would be around 7-12 celsius.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 11 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #337,135

68°

Syntax joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 22 minutes later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #337,137

@previous (G)
I want my summer Air Temp to be a few degrees above my Ocean a Blue Temp, which is currently 68 degrees.

Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 6 hours after the original post[^] [v] #337,139

@337,132 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
> dox, harassment

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 9 hours after the original post[^] [v] #337,163

> Fahrenheit
> 2012

WadeWilson !6lGsksrNJI joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 hours later, 11 hours after the original post[^] [v] #337,191

@previous (I)
Lolmerica.


60-69

Alcoholic Green !OAFoAfh8j. replied with this 14 years ago, 9 hours later, 20 hours after the original post[^] [v] #337,250

@337,132 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)
Thank you! That would be a good temperature.

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 10 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,373

@337,101 (Alcoholic Green !OAFoAfh8j.)
> Implying Celsius is appropriate for gauging room temperature.
> eurofail.

Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 45 seconds later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,374

@previous (K)
How is it not?

Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,378

@previous (E)
In the Celsius scale, 0-100 is the range for the liquid state of water.

In the Fahrenheit scale, 0-100 is the range of temperatures survivable by humans.

The latter is more relevant to humans than the former. It's pretty fucking basic.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,380

Around 15 celcius

@previous (K)

That's the stupidest thing I've ever read. And it doesn't say why celcius isn't appropriate for gauging room temperature.

Anonymous E replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,381

@337,378 (K)
Why does its relevancy to water matter? People will just get used to whichever one their country uses and become comfortable using that to gauge temperatures.

Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,383

@337,380 (L)
Really? It's really the stupidest thing you've EVER read? Not much for literacy then, are we?

The point is it's not the right tool for the job. It's like using a standard screwdriver to turn a Phillips head screw.

Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 10 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,387

@337,381 (E)
10/10

C and F were chosen arbitrarily. Both are useful and just as one enjoys the Fish n Chips of England or New England clam chowder, one enjoys the variations life offers on the menu.

C? F? Conversion factors. Ain't the variations in life just fucking great. A Gal with 34B breasts my end up with other numbers to describe what she has and its all good.

Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,389

@337,381 (E)
But that's my point. The Celsius scale is constructed around measuring something highly important in scientific experimentation, but not really important with regard to human survival needs.

In Fahrenheit scale is constructed around human needs. Therefore it is more appropriate for measuring human comfort.

Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 6 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,391

@previous (K)
Daily and almost every minute of my work day I look at temperature readings in C. Lots n lots of C readings. 3 Sun work stations currently spewing out C readings.

In my fun life I live for F readings. Do I put on my wet suit in the early AM when the water is currently 68 degrees F? Yes in the AM cause the air temp is cooler then the water. In a couple of hours the Air temp may be only equal to the water temp and no wet suit will be required.

So I live in both worlds of C n F. However the two standards have been the cause of Mega millions loss of $$ and even NASA has been fucked over because of Euro vs USA standards mixed up in Space craft software that caused horrid failures and crash landings on Mars for example.

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,393

@337,132 (HaikerensGuide !0VegJ9Jl.Q)

> 'sup reid

False.

Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 5 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,461

@337,383 (K)

> Really? It's really the stupidest thing you've EVER read? Not much for literacy then, are we?

Rhetoric, how does it work?

> The point is it's not the right tool for the job. It's like using a standard screwdriver to turn a Phillips head screw.

No it isn't. C is a lot better than F.

(Edited 1 minute later.)

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,462

@previous (L)

> No it isn't. C is a lot better than F.

Subjective opinion is subjective.

Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,464

@previous (N)

If it wasn't the better temperature-measuring standard of choice, every country would use Fahrenheit for everything except science.

Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,465

@previous (L)
> Implying governments make logical decisions.

Anonymous H replied with this 14 years ago, 19 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,474

@337,461 (L)
> No it isn't. C is a lot better than F

Yes n No .......C is for Science

F is more better for People.

(Edited 36 seconds later.)

Anonymous K replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,480

@337,461 (L)

> Rhetoric, how does it work?

Language, how does it work? Say what you mean or shut the fuck up. That's how it works.

OP joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 28 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,483

81 is optimal for me, but i haven't been here in so long, i can't vote.

Alcoholic Green !OAFoAfh8j. replied with this 14 years ago, 6 hours later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,532

@337,378 (K)

We're 70% water.

Anonymous B replied with this 14 years ago, 7 minutes later, 1 day after the original post[^] [v] #337,533

@337,389 (K)
> The Celsius scale is constructed around measuring something highly important in scientific experimentation, but not really important with regard to human survival needs.

> water
> not really important with regard to human survival needs.

Huh, you learn something new every day.

Anonymous L replied with this 14 years ago, 12 hours later, 2 days after the original post[^] [v] #337,582

@337,480 (K)

I'm sorry to hear you're an autistic retard and can only take things literally.

Anonymous N replied with this 14 years ago, 1 day later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #337,810

@337,533 (B)

> > water
> > not really important with regard to human survival needs.
>
> Huh, you learn something new every day.

Nice try, but we're discussing the physical state of water only here. The Celsius scale is constructed in such a way as to measure the percentage of the energy necessary to transition water from solid to gaseous state.

Saying the state of water is unimportant is not the same as saying water itself is unimportant. Even a monkey knows sucking an ice cube is the same as taking a drink.

Face it, Celsiusfags, you've been trolled.

Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 4 minutes later, 3 days after the original post[^] [v] #337,813

ITT: trolololololol
:

Please familiarise yourself with the rules and markup syntax before posting.