Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 48 minutes later[^][v]#337,059
actually, they belong in the hands of civilians
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 51 minutes after the original post[^][v]#337,061
> Walter > opinion
NRA joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 8 minutes later, 59 minutes after the original post[^][v]#337,062
Every warm blooded American over the age of 18, should be armed with AK-47's.
Anonymous A (OP) replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#337,063
@previous (NRA)
Maybe then they can defend themselves after that fucking Fast and Furious bullshit.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 38 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#337,064
@337,062 (NRA)
If you don't own at least 12 assault rifles, 65 sub-machine guns, 8 mounted .50 caliber turrets in a 5 foot thick concrete bunker, 3 bomb shelters, 2 million rounds of ammunition, 12 SAM turrets, 58 shoulder-mounted surface-to-air missile launchers and a thermonuclear warhead, then you are not exercising your 2nd amendment rights and you don't deserve to live in America. After all, that is the only way you can be sure that the U.S. Military will not invade your house THIS VERY INSTANT.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q joined in and replied with this 14 years ago, 12 minutes later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#337,066
@previous (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
yes, i agree. but that's all quite expensive, perhaps if we all aligned locally, by states, and created groups whereby we could divide the cost of the assault rifles, sub-machine guns, mounted .50 caliber turrets in a 5 foot thick concrete bunker, bomb shelters, millions of rounds of ammunition, SAM turrets, shoulder-mounted surface-to-air missile launchers and a thermonuclear warheads amongst the people involved in the collectives.
And all of the groups could aligned with each other through mutual defense packs.
We could call it the Confederacy! We could even have a constitution. (and by-laws!)
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 1 hour after the original post[^][v]#337,068
NRA replied with this 14 years ago, 2 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#337,071
@337,064 (Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU)
We might have a problem with thermonuclear warheads, unless limited to 10 Kilotons. Children in households would start playing with them and this might be a problem.
Fake anon !ZkUt8arUCU replied with this 14 years ago, 3 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#337,072
@previous (NRA)
Nuclear explosions don't kill people, silly goose. Only people do that.
squeegee !firstkPE1Q replied with this 14 years ago, 1 minute later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#337,073
@337,071 (NRA)
lol, not even. you'd put a limit on that? look, kids will be kids, and it's up to responsible nuke owners to not let their children play with them. especially if they keep them armed. it's best to have a nuke safe. a nuke safe won't prevent a nuclear weapon from fully functioning should it need to. it'll just go right through. plus it keeps your family safe. Nuke Safe.
NRA replied with this 14 years ago, 5 minutes later, 2 hours after the original post[^][v]#337,075